Phase III randomized controlled trial of gefitinib versus chemotherapy in EGFR-positive treatment-naïve metastatic lung cancer: Long-term outcome after eight years

Background: This was the first Phase III randomized study comparing an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), gefitinib, to standard-of-care chemotherapy (pemetrexed + carboplatin followed by pemetrexed maintenance) in advanced EGFR-mutated lung cancer. The initial interim analysis showed the superiority of gefitinib over chemotherapy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes. Our primary endpoint was to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) and duration of response (DOR). Materials and Methods: This was a Phase III open-label, randomized, parallel-group study conducted in the Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India, in patients with EGFR mutation-positive treatment-naïve Stage IIIB or IV lung adenocarcinoma. Patients were randomized to gefitinib (250 mg orally daily) or carboplatin (area under the curve 5) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) chemotherapy, followed by maintenance pemetrexed (500 mg/m2). Results: Between February 2012 and April 2016, 290 patients were randomized:145 to each arm. At a median follow-up of 104 months, all 290 (100%) patients had progressed, and 287 (99%) deaths had occurred. The median OS in the gefitinib arm was 19.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.7-24.8) compared to 22.6 months (95% CI, 19.2-25.2) in the chemotherapy arm; hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; 95% CI, 0.87-1.39; P, 0.423. The median PFS2 in the gefitinib arm was 15.5 months (95% CI, 13.5-18.1) compared to 12.5 months (95% CI, 11.1-14.5) in the chemotherapy arm; HR, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.66-1.13); P, 0.270. The median DOR was improved in the gefitinib arm (7.6 months; 95% CI, 5.45-9.88) compared to 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.49-6.35) in the chemotherapy arm; HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42-0.82; P, 0.002. The 5-year survival was 4.1% in the gefitinib arm versus 6.8% in the chemotherapy arm. Conclusions: This study establishes the advantages of first-line EGFR TKI therapy over chemotherapy in terms of a durable response and numerically superior PFS2. Due to crossover post-progression, there was is no significant difference in OS (Clinical Trials Registry of India number: CTRI/2015/08/006113)

Recent Advances in Amorphous Solid Dispersions: Preformulation, Formulation Strategies, Technological Advancements and Characterization

Amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) are among the most popular and widely studied solubility enhancement techniques. Since their inception in the early 1960s, the formulation development of ASDs has undergone tremendous progress. For instance, the method of preparing ASDs evolved from solvent-based approaches to solvent-free methods such as hot melt extrusion and Kinetisol®. The formulation approaches have advanced from employing a single polymeric carrier to multiple carriers with plasticizers to improve the stability and performance of ASDs. Major excipient manufacturers recognized the potential of ASDs and began introducing specialty excipients ideal for formulating ASDs. In addition to traditional techniques such as differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and X-ray crystallography, recent innovations such as nano-tomography, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and X-ray microscopy support a better understanding of the microstructure of ASDs. The purpose of this review is to highlight the recent advancements in the field of ASDs with respect to formulation approaches, methods of preparation, and advanced characterization technique

An Updated Review on the Multifaceted Therapeutic Potential of <i>Calendula officinalis</i> L.

Calendula officinalis Linn. (CO) is a popular medicinal plant from the plant kingdom’s Asteraceae family that has been used for millennia. This plant contains flavonoids, triterpenoids, glycosides, saponins, carotenoids, volatile oil, amino acids, steroids, sterols, and quinines. These chemical constituents confer multifaceted biological effects such as anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, antihelminthic, antidiabetes, wound healing, hepatoprotective, and antioxidant activities. Additionally, it is employed in cases of certain burns and gastrointestinal, gynecological, ocular, and skin conditions. In this review, we have discussed recent research from the last five years on the therapeutic applications of CO and emphasized its myriad capabilities as a traditional medicine. We have also elucidated CO’s molecular mechanisms and recent clinical studies. Overall, this review intends to summarize, fill in the gaps in the existing research, and provide a wealth of possibilities for researchers working to validate traditional claims and advance the safe and effective use of CO in treating various ailments

A real‐world data of Immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors from India

Abstract Background Checkpoint inhibitors (Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab) are approved for multiple indications in solid tumors. However access to these therapies is limited in low and middle income countries. Hence we performed an audit to identify accessibility, adverse event rates, compliance, progression free survival and overall survival in solid tumors. Methods This was a single center retrospective analysis of prospective data base of patients with non‐melanoma solid tumors who were treated with immunotherapy from August 2015 to November 2018. Adverse events during immunotherapy were documented and graded using CTCAE (Common terminology criteria for adverse events), v. 4.02. The response rates to immunotherapy, toxicities and the time to onset and resolution of toxicities were also evaluated as secondary endpoints. Results Out of 9610 patients, only 155 patients (1.61%) could receive immunotherapy. The most common malignancies included metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, metastatic urothelial carcinoma and relapsed/recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Median overall survival in patients who received immunotherapy in non‐melanoma solid malignancies was 5.37 months (95% CI, 3.73–9.73). Poor performance status at baseline was the only adverse prognostic factor. The median progression free survival was 2.57 months (95% CI, 1.73–3.83). Immunotherapy was well tolerated with most common side effects being fatigue 14.8% and anorexia 5.8%. The cumulative incidence of immune related adverse events like hepatitis, pneumonitis, colitis and nephritis was less than 10%. Conclusion Real‐world data in Indian setting confirms the benefit of immunotherapy in patients with advanced non‐melanoma solid tumors