5 research outputs found

    Combining Livetext With A Mastery Approach To Meet AACSB Assessment Requirements

    Get PDF
    Program assessment is an active component of AACSB standards that involves the systematic gathering, analyzing and interpreting of data on degree program effectiveness. The standard ensures that business schools assess degree programs, recommend needed improvements, and implement changes ‘that represent contemporary theory and practice.’ Livetext is an online suite of tools that permit instructors to actively track and monitor student progress while capturing needed assessment data. In this study we examine the experience at a Midwestern university in implementing Livetext and a ‘mastery approach’ as vehicles to facilitate course level as well as program and university level assessment. The paper concludes with lessons garnered from the experience

    A Course Planning Method to Incorporate Collaborative Learning in Information Systems Courses

    Get PDF
    Numerous researchers have investigated the relative merits of passive versus active learning. The research methodology, situation and approaches have varied. But the general consensus is that students comprehend and retain more material when actively involved in learning. The lecture process unfortunately places the students in a passive role and may limit their intellectual growth. Collaborative learning concepts provide a powerful strategy for enhancing MIS instruction by making learning active. The small group is a versatile organization that can be used to assist the student grasp material and then transform it into experience. This paper presents a planning process to enable MIS faculty to incorporate collaborative learning activities in their courses. A limited portfolio of collaborative learning activities are described along with possible evaluation techniques

    An Exploratory Analysis Of Issus In System & Acceptance Testing

    No full text
    This paper uses findings from a qualitative study to explore the issues identified by programmers and the end user community in conducting software testing. Narratives were collected from 103 software testers and project managers selected from 10 different organizations in the Kansas City/Jefferson City area. Semi-structured interviews were used to illuminate the background to, and ways in which people conceptualize and respond to testing issues in their specific organizational setting. The study findings suggest a number of managerial strategies to ensure a more efficient testing process
    corecore