Person‐Centered Emotional Support and Gender Attributions in Computer‐Mediated Communication

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/98127/1/hcre12006.pd

Facebook Jealousy: A Hyperperception Perspective

This study tests the predictive power of part of the recently proposed hyperperception model. The model’s components posit that aspects of an observer of other’s SNS interactions as well as aspects of the SNS environment may cause the observer’s perceptions of others’ interactional and relational intimacy to be heightened. This study describes potential predictors of romantic jealousy related to observing one’s partner on Facebook and uses the hyperperception model to make unique moderation predictions concerning the extent to which the potential rival is known to the observer. A survey of Facebook users (N = 615) tested those predictions by asking the participants to focus on their observations of a particular potential rival. Results are consistent with the model’s prediction that signs of closeness between the partner and a potential rival are substantially more likely to be associated with jealousy when the partner does not interact with the potential rival offline

The Hyperperception Model: when Your Partner\u27s New Friends Inspire Jealousy and Failing to Use Social Distancing

The hyperperception model was used to derive hypotheses concerning the processes by which people experience romantic jealousy because of their observation of their romantic partners on social network sites. The main focus was on the receiver component of the model that specifies that when observation of others\u27 interactions is constrained to social media, those interactions appear more intimate than when the dyad is also observable offline. A survey (N = 322) was conducted to test this component of the model and determine if the model can predict additional phenomena such as possession signals and staying home during the COVID-19 pandemic. The data were generally consistent with the hypotheses and the utility of the hyperperception model for understanding the effects of observing romantic partners\u27 interactions on social media. The data also reveal the importance of interpersonal processes in obeying social distancing guidelines

The Positivity Bias and Prosocial Deception on Facebook

Can the positivity bias, observed across various Social Network Sites (SNSs), predict the use of prosocial lies in a SNS such as Facebook? The positivity bias may be a product of politeness norms (i.e., positive face concern) that have influenced communication phenomena before these sites existed. In addition, positive face concern may also be affected by unconscious cues or primes that promote prosocial behavior on Facebook. We conducted an online experiment using current Facebook users to examine how positive face concern and surveillance primes affect prosocial lying in public and private Facebook contexts. Although positive face concern and publicness predicted the use of prosocial lying, positive face concern was not affected by the publicness and surveillance primes did not affect positive face concern or the use of prosocial lies in our study. This hints towards the nuance of positive face concern and the potential limitations of surveillance primes on prosocial lying behavior

Online Social Capital: Recent Trends in Research.

Research examining online social capital has grown since the introduction of information communication technologies (ICTs) into our everyday lives. This paper discusses recent trends in the research that examines how people are using ICTs to accumulate, increase, and utilize their offline and online social capital resources. These trends include the blurring gap between offline and online social capital, examining the use of new platforms to obtain online social capital, increased specificity concerning the types of online social capital that can be sought, how taking advantage of online social capital resources affects personal well-being, and how researchers are moving beyond the college-aged population in their online social capital studies

Should I Share That? Prompting Social Norms That Influence Privacy Behaviors on a Social Networking Site

This study examines how explicit and implicit cues to social norms affect disclosure and privacy decisions in a Social Network Site (SNS) context. Study 1 revealed that participants\u27 disclosure behavior adhered to explicit cues indicating disclosure frequency norms, while implicit social norm cues (i.e., surveillance primes) acted to increase overall disclosure frequency and affect disclosure accuracy when explicit cues discourage disclosure. Study 2 explored how these cues affected privacy-setting decisions and found that explicit cues indicating others\u27 privacy settings could increase how strictly participants set their privacy settings, but the implicit cues had no effect. These results suggest that explicit cues about SNS norms can trigger bandwagon heuristic processing, and that, under limited circumstances, surveillance primes can affect self-disclosure