Platinum drugs in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

The use of chemotherapy is considered standard therapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer that cannot be treated with radiotherapy and in those with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and good performance status. This approach is also accepted in patients with earlier stage disease, when combined with radiotherapy in those with non-resectable locally advanced disease, or in the preoperative setting. Randomised clinical studies and meta-analyses of the literature have confirmed the beneficial survival effect of platinum-based chemotherapy. Cisplatin and carboplatin have been successfully used with other drugs in a wide variety of well-established two-drug combinations while three-drug combinations are still under investigation. Cisplatin and carboplatin use is limited by toxicity and inherent resistance. These considerations have prompted research into new platinum agents, such as the trinuclear platinum agent BBR3464, the platinum complex ZD0473 and oxaliplatin. These compounds could be developed in combination with agents such as paclitaxel, gemcitabine or vinorelbine in patients with advanced and/or refractory solid tumours

ABO incompatibility and RhIG immunoprophylaxis protect against non-D alloimmunization by pregnancy

BACKGROUND: Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is caused by maternal antibodies against fetal red blood cell antigens, most often anti-D, -K, or -c. ABO incompatibility between mother and child and anti-D immunoprophylaxis (RhIG) are known to reduce the risk of D immunization and subsequent HDFN. However, no immunoprophylaxis has been developed to prevent non-D immunizations. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We evaluated whether ABO incompatibility has a preventive effect on formation of non-D alloantibodies, by performing a case-control study including pregnant women with newly detected non-D antibodies, identified within a nationwide data set, immunized during their first pregnancy and/or delivery. Subsequently, we assessed a possible protective effect of RhIG in a subgroup with non-Rh antibodies only. The proportions of previous ABO incompatibility and of RhIG administrations of these women were compared to the known rate of 19.4% ABO incompatibility and 9.9% RhIG administrations (D– women carrying a D+ child) in the general population of pregnant women. RESULTS: A total of 11.9% of the 232 included immunized women had a possible ABO incompatibility in their first pregnancy (vs. expected 19.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3-18.8; p = 0.036). Furthermore, 1.0% women with non-Rh antibodies were D–, delivered a D+ child, and had therefore received RhIG, whereas 9.9% was expected (95% CI, 0.18-5.50; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: We found that ABO incompatibility and RhIG reduce the risks not only for D, but also for non-Rh immunizations, suggesting that antibody-mediated immune suppression in this condition is not antigen specific