9 research outputs found
Uncovering the Synchronous Role of Bis-borane with Nucleophilic Solvent as Frustrated Lewis pair in Metal-free Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Ammonia-borane
Metal free catalysis has emerged as a viable alternative for transition metal based catalysts for enabling different chemical processes, particularly for de/hydrogenation reactions. Herein, employing theoretical studies we reveal the unexpected Frustrated Lewis Pair like reactivity of a boron based catalyst, 9,10-dichlorodiboraanthracene and the ethereal solvent to enable dehydrogenation of ammonia-borane (NH3BH3, AB) under mild conditions. The mechanistic channels thus uncovered reveal that the boron catalyst abstracts a hydride from NH3BH3 followed by crucial stabilisation of the NH3BH2+ moiety by the nucleophilic action of the solvent. H2 is released by the combination of hydride and proton from the borohydride moiety and the solvated NH3BH2+ respectively. Catalysis becomes unfeasible if the Lewis base-like action of the ethereal solvent is not taken into consideration. Thus it is suggested that the clandestine partnership of the Lewis Acid, Boron catalyst and the Lewis Base, ethereal solvent, i.e. FLP like action enables dehydrogenation of NH3BH3 in the instant case
Mechanistic Details of Ru–Bis(pyridyl)borate Complex Catalyzed Dehydrogenation of Ammonia–Borane: Role of the Pendant Boron Ligand in Catalysis
The role of pendant
boron ligands in ammonia–borane (AB)
dehydrogenation has been investigated using hybrid density functional
theory for two very efficient ruthenium-based catalysts developed
by Williams and co-workers. Our findings reveal that the catalytic
action initiates through opening of the labile metal–ligand
bridging group associated with the boron-based pendant ligand arm
for both catalysts. In case of the hydroxyl-bridged catalyst, the
ligand (B–OH moiety) backbone plays an active role along with
the metal center to perform concerted dehydrogenation of ammonia–borane
by overcoming a free energy activation barrier of 24.3 kcal/mol, and
this dehydrogenation step is the rate-determining step of the catalytic
cycle. However, for the trifluoroacetate-bridged complex, H<sub>2</sub> is released in a stepwise fashion with active participation of the
solvent. It involves formation of a boronium cation with a rate-determining
free energy activation barrier of 23.7 kcal/mol for the solvent-assisted
B–H bond-breaking step, while the pendant boron ligand acts
as a spectator. Overall, our detailed theoretical study illustrates
that the chemical nature of the pendant boron ligand is decisive in
the AB dehydrogenation pathway. Further computational investigations
indicate that greater amounts of hydrogen are released from AB by
the dual participation of free NH<sub>2</sub>BH<sub>2</sub> and the
Ru catalysts
Unraveling the Crucial Role of Metal-Free Catalysis in Borazine and Polyborazylene Formation in Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Ammonia–Borane Dehydrogenation
Though
the recent scientific literature is rife with experimental
and theoretical studies on transition-metal (TM)-catalyzed dehydrogenation
of ammonia–borane (NH<sub>3</sub>·BH<sub>3</sub>) due
to its relevance in chemical hydrogen storage, the mechanistic knowledge
is mostly restricted to the formation of aminoborane (NH<sub>2</sub>BH<sub>2</sub>) after 1 equiv of H<sub>2</sub> removal from NH<sub>3</sub>·BH<sub>3</sub>. Unfortunately, the chemistry behind
the formation of borazine and polyborazylene, which happens only after
more than 1 equiv of H<sub>2</sub> is released from ammonia–borane
in these TM-catalyzed homogeneous reactions, largely remains unknown.
In this work we use density functional theory to unravel the curious
function of “free NH<sub>2</sub>BH<sub>2</sub>”. Initially,
free NH<sub>2</sub>BH<sub>2</sub> molecules form oligomers such as
cyclotriborazane and <i>B</i>-(cyclodiborazanyl)Âaminoborohydride.
We show that, through a web of concerted proton and hydride transfer
based dehydrogenations of oligomeric intermediates, cycloaddition
reactions, and hydroboration steps facilitated by NH<sub>2</sub>BH<sub>2</sub>, the development of the polyborazylene framework occurs.
The rate-determining free energy barrier for the formation of a polyborazylene
template is predicted to be 25.7 kcal/mol at the M05-2XÂ(SMD)/6-31++GÂ(d,p)//M05-2X/6-31++GÂ(d,p)
level of theory. The dehydrogenation of BN oligomeric intermediates
by NH<sub>2</sub>BH<sub>2</sub> yields NH<sub>3</sub>·BH<sub>3</sub>, suggesting for certain catalytic systems that the role of
the TM catalyst is limited to the dehydrogenation of NH<sub>3</sub>·BH<sub>3</sub> to maintain optimal amounts of free NH<sub>2</sub>BH<sub>2</sub> in the reaction medium to enable polyborazylene formation.
TM catalysts that fail to produce borazine and polyborazylene falter
because they rapidly consume NH<sub>2</sub>BH<sub>2</sub> in TM-catalyzed
polyaminoborane formation, thus preventing the chain of events triggered
by NH<sub>2</sub>BH<sub>2</sub>
Rh(II)-Catalysed N2-Selective Arylation of Benzotriazoles and Indazoles using Quinoid Carbenes via 1,5-H Shift
A Rh(II)-catalyzed highly selective N2-arylation of benzotriazole is developed with wide scope and good functional group tolerance. The reaction is also extended on indazole and substituted 1,2,3-triazole scaffolds. In addition, late-stage arylation of benzotriazoles tethered with bioactive molecules is realized under the developed conditions. Control experiments and DFT calculations reveal that presumably, the reaction proceeds via nucleophilic addition of N2 (of 1H tautomer) center to metal-carbene followed by 1,5-H shift. This differs from classical X-H insertion into carbene centers and subsequent 1,2-H shift
Reactivity of Biomimetic Iron(II)-2-aminophenolate Complexes toward Dioxygen: Mechanistic Investigations on the Oxidative C–C Bond Cleavage of Substituted 2‑Aminophenols
The isolation and characterization
of a series of ironÂ(II)-2-aminophenolate
complexes [(6-Me<sub>3</sub>-TPA)ÂFe<sup>II</sup>(X)]<sup>+</sup> (X
= 2-amino-4-nitrophenolate (4-NO<sub>2</sub>-HAP), <b>1;</b> X = 2-aminophenolate (2-HAP), <b>2</b>; X = 2-amino-3-methylphenolate
(3-Me-HAP), <b>3</b>; X = 2-amino-4-methylphenolate (4-Me-HAP), <b>4</b>; X = 2-amino-5-methylphenolate (5-Me-HAP), <b>5</b>; X = 2-amino-4-<i>tert</i>-butylphenolate (4-<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu-HAP), <b>6</b> and X = 2-amino-4,6-di-<i>tert</i>-butylphenolate (4,6-di-<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu-HAP), <b>7</b>) and an ironÂ(III)-2-amidophenolate complex
[(6-Me<sub>3</sub>-TPA)ÂFe<sup>III</sup>(4,6-di-<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu-AP)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>7</b><sup><b>Ox</b></sup>) supported by a tripodal nitrogen ligand (6-Me<sub>3</sub>-TPA =
trisÂ(6-methyl-2-pyridylmethyl)Âamine) are reported. Substituted 2-aminophenols
were used to prepare the biomimetic ironÂ(II) complexes to understand
the effect of electronic and structural properties of aminophenolate
rings on the dioxygen reactivity and on the selectivity of C–C
bond cleavage reactions. Crystal structures of the cationic parts
of <b>5</b>·ClO<sub>4</sub> and <b>7</b>·BPh<sub>4</sub> show six-coordinate ironÂ(II) centers ligated by a neutral
tetradentate ligand and a monoanionic 2-aminophenolate in a bidentate
fashion. While <b>1</b>·BPh<sub>4</sub> does not react
with oxygen, other complexes undergo oxidative transformation in the
presence of dioxygen. The reaction of <b>2</b>·ClO<sub>4</sub> with dioxygen affords 2-amino-3<i>H</i>-phenoxazin-3-one,
an auto-oxidation product of 2-aminophenol, whereas complexes <b>3</b>·BPh<sub>4</sub>, <b>4</b>·BPh<sub>4</sub>, <b>5</b>·ClO<sub>4</sub> and <b>6</b>·ClO<sub>4</sub> react with O<sub>2</sub> to exhibit C–C bond cleavage
of the bound aminophenolates. Complexes <b>7</b>·ClO<sub>4</sub> and <b>7</b><sup>Ox</sup>·BPh<sub><b>4</b></sub> produce a mixture of 4,6-di-<i>tert</i>-butyl-2<i>H</i>-pyran-2-imine and 4,6-di-<i>tert</i>-butyl-2-picolinic
acid. Labeling experiments with <sup>18</sup>O<sub>2</sub> show the
incorporation of one oxygen atom from dioxygen into the cleavage products.
The reactivity (and stability) of the intermediate, which directs
the course of aromatic ring cleavage reaction, is found to be dependent
on the nature of ring substituent. The presence of two <i>tert</i>-butyl groups on the aminophenolate ring in <b>7</b>·ClO<sub>4</sub> makes the complex slow to cleave the C–C bond of 4,6-di-<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu-HAP, whereas <b>4</b>·BPh<sub>4</sub> containing 4-Me-HAP displays fastest reactivity. Density
functional theory calculations were conducted on [(6-Me<sub>3</sub>-TPA)ÂFe<sup>III</sup>(4-<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu-AP)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>6</b><sup>Ox</sup>) to gain a mechanistic insight
into the regioselective C–C bond cleavage reaction. On the
basis of the experimental and computational studies, an ironÂ(II)-2-iminobenzosemiquinonate
intermediate is proposed to react with dioxygen resulting in the oxidative
C–C bond cleavage of the coordinated 2-aminophenolates
Reactivity of Biomimetic Iron(II)-2-aminophenolate Complexes toward Dioxygen: Mechanistic Investigations on the Oxidative C–C Bond Cleavage of Substituted 2‑Aminophenols
The isolation and characterization
of a series of ironÂ(II)-2-aminophenolate
complexes [(6-Me<sub>3</sub>-TPA)ÂFe<sup>II</sup>(X)]<sup>+</sup> (X
= 2-amino-4-nitrophenolate (4-NO<sub>2</sub>-HAP), <b>1;</b> X = 2-aminophenolate (2-HAP), <b>2</b>; X = 2-amino-3-methylphenolate
(3-Me-HAP), <b>3</b>; X = 2-amino-4-methylphenolate (4-Me-HAP), <b>4</b>; X = 2-amino-5-methylphenolate (5-Me-HAP), <b>5</b>; X = 2-amino-4-<i>tert</i>-butylphenolate (4-<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu-HAP), <b>6</b> and X = 2-amino-4,6-di-<i>tert</i>-butylphenolate (4,6-di-<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu-HAP), <b>7</b>) and an ironÂ(III)-2-amidophenolate complex
[(6-Me<sub>3</sub>-TPA)ÂFe<sup>III</sup>(4,6-di-<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu-AP)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>7</b><sup><b>Ox</b></sup>) supported by a tripodal nitrogen ligand (6-Me<sub>3</sub>-TPA =
trisÂ(6-methyl-2-pyridylmethyl)Âamine) are reported. Substituted 2-aminophenols
were used to prepare the biomimetic ironÂ(II) complexes to understand
the effect of electronic and structural properties of aminophenolate
rings on the dioxygen reactivity and on the selectivity of C–C
bond cleavage reactions. Crystal structures of the cationic parts
of <b>5</b>·ClO<sub>4</sub> and <b>7</b>·BPh<sub>4</sub> show six-coordinate ironÂ(II) centers ligated by a neutral
tetradentate ligand and a monoanionic 2-aminophenolate in a bidentate
fashion. While <b>1</b>·BPh<sub>4</sub> does not react
with oxygen, other complexes undergo oxidative transformation in the
presence of dioxygen. The reaction of <b>2</b>·ClO<sub>4</sub> with dioxygen affords 2-amino-3<i>H</i>-phenoxazin-3-one,
an auto-oxidation product of 2-aminophenol, whereas complexes <b>3</b>·BPh<sub>4</sub>, <b>4</b>·BPh<sub>4</sub>, <b>5</b>·ClO<sub>4</sub> and <b>6</b>·ClO<sub>4</sub> react with O<sub>2</sub> to exhibit C–C bond cleavage
of the bound aminophenolates. Complexes <b>7</b>·ClO<sub>4</sub> and <b>7</b><sup>Ox</sup>·BPh<sub><b>4</b></sub> produce a mixture of 4,6-di-<i>tert</i>-butyl-2<i>H</i>-pyran-2-imine and 4,6-di-<i>tert</i>-butyl-2-picolinic
acid. Labeling experiments with <sup>18</sup>O<sub>2</sub> show the
incorporation of one oxygen atom from dioxygen into the cleavage products.
The reactivity (and stability) of the intermediate, which directs
the course of aromatic ring cleavage reaction, is found to be dependent
on the nature of ring substituent. The presence of two <i>tert</i>-butyl groups on the aminophenolate ring in <b>7</b>·ClO<sub>4</sub> makes the complex slow to cleave the C–C bond of 4,6-di-<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu-HAP, whereas <b>4</b>·BPh<sub>4</sub> containing 4-Me-HAP displays fastest reactivity. Density
functional theory calculations were conducted on [(6-Me<sub>3</sub>-TPA)ÂFe<sup>III</sup>(4-<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu-AP)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>6</b><sup>Ox</sup>) to gain a mechanistic insight
into the regioselective C–C bond cleavage reaction. On the
basis of the experimental and computational studies, an ironÂ(II)-2-iminobenzosemiquinonate
intermediate is proposed to react with dioxygen resulting in the oxidative
C–C bond cleavage of the coordinated 2-aminophenolates
Cis<i>–</i>Trans Conformational Analysis of δ‑Azaproline in Peptides
The cis–trans isomerization
and conformer specificity of
δ-azaproline and its carbamate-protected form in linear and
cyclic peptides were investigated using NMR and α-chymotrypsin
assay. Comparisons of the chemical shift value of the α-hydrogen
in each case of δ-azaproline-containing peptides with conformer-specific
locked diketopiperazines reveal the fact that an upfield chemical
shift value corresponds to cis conformer and a downfield value corresponds
to a trans conformer. δ-Azaproline adopts cis-conformation in
simple amides, dipeptides, and tripeptides whereas its carbamate-protected
form adopts trans-conformation. In the case of longer, linear or cyclic
peptides, vice versa results are obtained. Interestingly, in all these
peptides exclusively one conformer, either cis or trans, is stabilized.
This cis–trans isomerization is independent of both temperature
and solvents; only the δ-nitrogen protecting group plays key
role in the isomerization. δ-Azaproline is conformer-specific
in either of its protected or deprotected forms, which is a unique
property of this proline. Unlike other covalently modified proline
surrogates, this isomerization of δ-azaproline can be tuned
easily by a protecting group. The mechanism of cis–trans isomerization
of δ-azaproline during deprotection and reprotection is supported
by theoretical calculations
A “Hemilabile” Palladium–Carbon Bond: Characterization and Its Implication in Catalysis
An unusual palladium–carbon
bond was identified in the crystal
structure of a PdÂ(II) complex (<b>VI</b>) derived from 1-(2-diphenylphosphinophenyl)-2,5-dimethyl-1<i>H</i>-pyrrole (<b>L4</b>). Theoretical calculations indicate
that the Pd–C bond is covalent in nature. The complex exhibits
fluxional behavior in solution at ambient temperatureî—¸the Pd
binds alternately to C2 and C5 of pyrrole, generating equivalent,
enantiomeric structures. Theory predicts that the transition state
of this interconversion probably occurs through an unsaturated 14e
complex, where the ligand binds the metal in a monodentate fashion.
Comparison with related structures reported earlier has been made,
and the possible implication of such unusual bonding in the context
of catalysis of coupling reactions is discussed