Controlled transportation of mesoscopic particles by enhanced spin orbit interaction of light in an optical trap

We study the effects of the spin orbit interaction (SOI) of light in an optical trap and show that the propagation of the tightly focused trapping beam in a stratified medium can lead to significantly enhanced SOI. For a plane polarized incident beam the SOI manifests itself by giving rise to a strong anisotropic linear diattenuation effect which produces polarization-dependent off-axis high intensity side lobes near the focal plane of the trap. Single micron-sized asymmetric particles can be trapped in the side lobes, and transported over circular paths by a rotation of the plane of input polarization. We demonstrate such controlled motion on single pea-pod shaped single soft oxometalate (SOM) particles of dimension around $1\times 0.5\mu$m over lengths up to $\sim$15 $\mu$m . The observed effects are supported by calculations of the intensity profiles based on a variation of the Debye-Wolf approach. The enhanced SOI could thus be used as a generic means of transporting mesoscopic asymmetric particles in an optical trap without the use of complex optical beams or changing the alignment of the beam into the trap.Comment: 9 pages, 7 figure

Biochemical Recurrence Surrogacy for Clinical Outcomes After Radiotherapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate

Biochemical recurrence; Radiotherapy; Prostate adenocarcinomaRecurrència bioquímica; Radioteràpia; Adenocarcinoma de pròstataRecurrencia bioquímica; Radioterapia; Adenocarcinoma de próstataPURPOSE The surrogacy of biochemical recurrence (BCR) for overall survival (OS) in localized prostate cancer remains controversial. Herein, we evaluate the surrogacy of BCR using different surrogacy analytic methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS Individual patient data from 11 trials evaluating radiotherapy dose escalation, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) use, and ADT prolongation were obtained. Surrogate candidacy was assessed using the Prentice criteria (including landmark analyses) and the two-stage meta-analytic approach (estimating Kendall's tau and the R2). Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS, time from random assignment to BCR or any death) and time to BCR (TTBCR, time from random assignment to BCR or cancer-specific deaths censoring for noncancer-related deaths) were assessed. RESULTS Overall, 10,741 patients were included. Dose escalation, addition of short-term ADT, and prolongation of ADT duration significantly improved BCR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.79]; HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.59]; and HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.61], respectively). Adding short-term ADT (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.84 to 0.99]) and prolonging ADT (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.94]) significantly improved OS, whereas dose escalation did not (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.87 to 1.11]). BCR at 48 months was associated with inferior OS in all three groups (HR, 2.46 [95% CI, 2.08 to 2.92]; HR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.35 to 1.70]; and HR, 2.31 [95% CI, 2.04 to 2.61], respectively). However, after adjusting for BCR at 48 months, there was no significant treatment effect on OS (HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.96 to 1.27]; HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.87 to 1.06] and 1.00 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.12], respectively). The patient-level correlation (Kendall's tau) for BCRFS and OS ranged between 0.59 and 0.69, and that for TTBCR and OS ranged between 0.23 and 0.41. The R2 values for trial-level correlation of the treatment effect on BCRFS and TTBCR with that on OS were 0.563 and 0.160, respectively. CONCLUSION BCRFS and TTBCR are prognostic but failed to satisfy all surrogacy criteria. Strength of correlation was greater when noncancer-related deaths were considered events.Supported by Cancer Research UK Radiation Research Centre of Excellence at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research (grant A28724) (A.C.T.); Cancer Research UK Programme Grant (C33589/A28284)(A.C.T.); NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at The Royal Marsden and The Institute of Cancer Research (A.C.T.); grant P50CA09213 from the Prostate Cancer National Institutes of Health Specialized Programs of Research Excellence (A.U.K.); grant PC210066 from the Department of Defense (A.U.K.), the Prostate Cancer Foundation, and the American Society for Radiation Oncology (A.U.K.); and funding from the Chapgier, Bershad, De Silva, and McCarrick Families (A.U.K.)