Integrated care: a fresh perspective for international health policies in low and middle-income countries

PURPOSE: To propose a social-and-democrat health policy alternative to the current neoliberal one. CONTEXT OF CASE: The general failure of neoliberal health policies in low and middle-income countries justifies the design of an alternative to bring disease control and health care back in step with ethical principles and desired outcomes. DATA SOURCES: National policies, international programmes and pilot experiments—including those led by the authors—are examined in both scientific and grey literature. CASE DESCRIPTION: We call for the promotion of a publicly-oriented health sector as a cornerstone of such alternative policy. We define ‘publicly-oriented’ as opposed to ‘private-for-profit’ in terms of objectives and commitment, not of ownership. We classify development strategies for such a sector according to an organisation-based typology of health systems defined by Mintzberg. As such, strategies are adapted to three types of health systems: machine bureaucracies, professional bureaucracies and divisionalized forms. We describe avenues for family and community health and for hospital care. We stress social control at the peripheral level to increase accountability and responsiveness. Community-based, national and international sources are required to provide viable financing. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION: Our proposed social-and-democrat health policy calls for networking, lobbying and training as a joint effort in which committed health professionals can lead the way

Disintegrated care: the Achilles heel of international health policies in low and middle-income countries

PURPOSE: To review the evidence basis of international aid and health policy. CONTEXT OF CASE: Current international aid policy is largely neoliberal in its promotion of commoditization and privatisation. We review this policy's responsibility for the lack of effectiveness in disease control and poor access to care in low and middle-income countries. DATA SOURCES: National policies, international programmes and pilot experiments are examined in both scientific and grey literature. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION: We document how health care privatisation has led to the pool of patients being cut off from public disease control interventions—causing health care disintegration—which in turn resulted in substandard performance of disease control. Privatisation of health care also resulted in poor access. Our analysis consists of three steps. Pilot local contracting-out experiments are scrutinized; national health care records of Colombia and Chile, two countries having adopted contracting-out as a basis for health care delivery, are critically examined against Costa Rica; and specific failure mechanisms of the policy in low and middle-income countries are explored. We conclude by arguing that the negative impact of neoliberal health policy on disease control and health care in low and middle-income countries justifies an alternative aid policy to improve both disease control and health care

Community Health Insurance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Community health insurance (CHI) is a specific health insurance arrangement serving a social purpose, generally operating at the local level of the health system, and largely thriving on community solidarity. This article describes the origins, formats, and evolution of CHI in Africa and Asia. It discusses strengths and weaknesses of CHI from different perspectives: its contribution to health-care access, to health sector financing, to provider responsiveness and quality of care, and to wider developmental objectives. The potential of CHI in the worldwide endeavor for universal health coverage and the conditions for CHI to possibly play a role of significance are critically analyzed.SCOPUS: ch.binfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

International aid policy: public disease control and private curative care?

Integrating disease control with health care delivery increases the prospects for successful disease control. This paper examines whether current international aid policy tends to allocate disease control and curative care to different sectors, preventing such integration. Typically, disease control has been conceptualized in vertical programs. This changed with the Alma Ata vision of comprehensive care, but was soon encouraged again by the Selective Primary Health Care concept. Documents are analyzed from the most influential actors in the field, e.g. World Health Organization, World Bank, and European Union. These agencies do indeed have a doctrine on international aid policy: to allocate disease control to the public sector and curative health care to the private sector, wherever possible. We examine whether there is evidence to support such a doctrine. Arguments justifying integration are discussed, as well as those that critically analyze the consequences of non-integration. Answers are sought to the crucial question of why important stakeholders continue to insist on separating disease control from curative care. We finally make a recommendation for all international actors to address health care and disease control together, from a systems perspective

Costa Rica: Achievements of a Heterodox Health Policy

Costa Rica is a middle-income country with a strong governmental emphasis on human development. For more than half a century, its health policies have applied the principles of equity and solidarity to strengthen access to care through public services and universal social health insurance