Expert opinion on published article : Chondrolysis, osteonecrosis and slip severity in patients with subsequent contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis

This is very interesting for the orthopaedic community at large, especially for registrars. It would seem that the days of the controversies surrounding the pinning of the contralateral normal hip in slipped capital femoral epiphysis are numbered. The aim of the study was to identify the prevalence of chondrolysis, osteonecrosis and the degree of slip in contralateral hips with subsequent slipped capital femoral epiphysis. The authors demonstrated that the complications associated with a subsequent contralateral slip were greater than the risk of prophylactic pinning of the normal hip. In this retrospective study the incidence of a subsequent slip following pinning of the primary slip was 36%. Current literature reports a range of between 25% and 40%. The authors reviewed 227 patients operated between 1993 and 2003 at a single hospital. The average follow-up was 24 months or until skeletal maturity. A total of 82 patients had subsequent slips

Quality of recovery after total hip and knee arthroplasty in South Africa : a national prospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND: Encouraged by the widespread adoption of enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) for elective total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) in high-income countries, our nationwide multidisciplinary research group first performed a Delphi study to establish the framework for a unified ERP for THA/TKA in South Africa. The objectives of this second phase of changing practice were to document quality of patient recovery, record patient characteristics and audit standard perioperative practice. METHODS: From May to December 2018, nine South African public hospitals conducted a 10-week prospective observational study of patients undergoing THA/TKA. The primary outcome was ‘days alive and at home up to 30 days after surgery’ (DAH30) as a patient-centred measure of quality of recovery incorporating early death, hospital length of stay (LOS), discharge destination and readmission during the first 30 days after surgery. Preoperative patient characteristics and perioperative care were documented to audit practice. RESULTS: Twenty-one (10.1%) out of 207 enrolled patients had their surgery cancelled or postponed resulting in 186 study patients. No fatalities were recorded, median LOS was 4 (inter-quartile-range (IQR), 3–5) days and 30-day readmission rate was 3.8%, leading to a median DAH30 of 26 (25–27) days. Forty patients (21.5%) had pre-existing anaemia and 24 (12.9%) were morbidly obese. In the preoperative period, standard care involved assessment in an optimisation clinic, multidisciplinary education and full-body antiseptic wash for 67 (36.2%), 74 (40.0%) and 55 (30.1%) patients, respectively. On the first postoperative day, out-of-bed mobilisation was achieved by 69 (38.1%) patients while multimodal analgesic regimens (paracetamol and Non-Steroid-Anti-Inflammatory-Drugs) were administered to 29 patients (16.0%). CONCLUSION: Quality of recovery measured by a median DAH30 of 26 days justifies performance of THA/TKA in South African public hospitals. That said, perioperative practice, including optimisation of modifiable risk factors, lacked standardisation suggesting that quality of patient care and postoperative recovery may improve with implementation of ERP principles. Notwithstanding the limited resources available, we anticipate that a change of practice for THA/TKA is feasible if ‘buy-in’ from the involved multidisciplinary units is obtained in the next phase of our nationwide ERP initiative.http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmusculoskeletdisordpm2021AnaesthesiologyOrthopaedic SurgeryPhysiotherap