The Current Status and Evolving Role of Sunitinib in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

AbstractSunitinib, a small molecule, is a multitargeted receptor kinase inhibitor which targets the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor as well as several others. Initially approved for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma as well as imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors, the activity of sunitinib has been explored in several other solid tumors including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An initial phase II trial in 63 previously treated NSCLC patients using a dose of 50 mg daily 4 of 6 weeks showed a response rate of 11.1% and a stable disease rate of 26.8%. The median time to disease progression and overall survival was 12.0 and 23.4 weeks, respectively. The principal toxicities included fatigue, pain, myalgias, nausea/vomiting, and hypertension. Three hemorrhagic deaths were reported (two pulmonary and one central nervous system). After this trial was completed, a subsequent sequential cohort of 47 previously treated NSCLC patients were treated on a continuous dosing schedule of sunitinib at 37.5 mg daily. A response rate of 2.1% was reported with a stable disease rate of 19.X%. The median time to progression was 12.3 weeks with a median survival time of 38.1 week. Toxicities were, in general, less frequent and similar to those noted in the initial trial. Sunitinib is currently being evaluated in combination with a number of standard regimens commonly used in NSCLC as well as a maintenance drug after first-line platinum-based treatment of advanced NSCLC. Results of these trials are eagerly awaited and will help define the role of sunitinib in the therapeutic approach to NSCLC

Maintenance Therapy in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Status and Future Implications

Maintenance therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer has been an area of intense investigation. Maintenance therapy has been divided into two broad categories: continuation maintenance when the chemotherapy or targeted agent was part of a defined number of cycles of combination therapy and in the absence of disease progression is continued as a single agent or switch maintenance when a third agent is initiated after four cycles of platinum-based double-agent chemotherapy in the absence of disease progression. Two monoclonal antibodies, cetuximab and bevacizumab, are used as continuation maintenance, but the incremental benefit of the maintenance therapy with these agents is undetermined. Phase III trials have not revealed an overall survival benefit for continuation maintenance chemotherapy, and this approach should be considered investigational. Phase III trials have demonstrated an improvement in overall survival with switch maintenance therapy with pemetrexed compared with placebo in patients with nonsquamous histology and erlotinib compared with placebo. Phase III trials have not revealed an improvement in quality of life with maintenance therapy. In the trials of maintenance therapy, 30 to 40% of patients enrolled in the observation or placebo arm did not receive second-line therapy, and among the patients who did receive second-line therapy, there was significant heterogeneity in the therapy. The development of maintenance therapy has raised issues about the role of treatment-free intervals in routine clinical care, trial design issues such as the optimal endpoint, the ethics of a placebo arm, and the implications of maintenance therapy for first-line trials

Treatment Paradigms for Advanced Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Multiple Lines of Therapy

Abstract:: The duration of first-line and the timing of second-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer has been an area of recent investigation. Five trials have been performed that have investigated shorter (3–4 cycles) versus longer duration of platinum-based therapy; four trials revealed an equivalent overall survival with the shorter duration of therapy, and one trial revealed superior survival with the longer duration of therapy. The toxicity and quality of life data has either been equivalent or favored the shorter duration of therapy. Two trials have investigated the timing of a second-line therapy after completion of four cycles of platinum-based therapy versus the standard treatment paradigm of initiating second-line therapy upon disease progression. Both of these trials have revealed a statistically significant improvement in the progression-free survival, and a trend towards improved survival for the earlier use of second-line therapy. Only 50 to 60% of patients on the standard treatment arm initiated second-line therapy, and the promising results observed are most likely related to the fact that a higher percentage of patients received second-line therapy on the experimental arm. Several trials have investigated maintenance chemotherapy, and these trials have not revealed a survival benefit probably due to the fact that many patients experience disease progression or unacceptable toxicity during the initial or maintenance therapy. The addition of a targeted agent (bevacizumab or cetuximab) to the initial chemotherapy and the continuation of the targeted agent after completion of the chemotherapy have yielded superior overall survival in comparison to chemotherapy alone. The incremental benefit of the maintenance therapy with the targeted agent is unknown

Weekly nab-Paclitaxel in Combination With Carboplatin as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis of Safety and Efficacy in Patients With Diabetes

AbstractPurposeTo examine outcomes in a phase 3 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin (nab-P/C) versus solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin (sb-P/C) in a subset of patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and diabetes.Patients and MethodsPatients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC received nab-P 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 or sb-P 200 mg/m2 on day 1, both with C at an area under the curve of 6 mg·min/mL on day 1 every 3 weeks. Overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined by blinded, independent, centralized review. P values were based on chi-square test for ORR and log-rank test for overall survival (OS) and PFS.ResultsOf the 1052 randomized patients in the phase 3 trial, 61 had diabetes according to prespecified terms (nab-P/C, 31; sb-P/C, 30). ORR for nab-P/C versus sb-P/C in this subset was 52% versus 27% (relative risk ratio, 1.935; P = .046), median PFS was 10.9 versus 4.9 months (hazard ratio, 0.420; P = .016), and median OS was 17.5 versus 11.1 months (hazard ratio, 0.550; P = .057). Treatment differences in PFS remained significant (P ≤ .036) after adjusting for histology, region, stage, race, and age and also remained significant in OS for histology (P = .039). Patients with diabetes experienced lower rates of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy and higher rates of thrombocytopenia and anemia with nab-P/C versus sb-P/C.Conclusionnab-P/C demonstrated improved efficacy and manageable tolerability in patients with advanced NSCLC and diabetes

Impact of the ASCO 2007 Presentation of HOG Lun 01-24/USO-023 on the Prescribing Plans of American Medical Oncologists for Patients with Stage IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction:Nonoperative treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer has evolved over the past 30 years. The current approach in the Unites States most often includes concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Methods:We have used live, case-based research events to document prescribing plans among American medical oncologists for first-line therapy in patients with N3 stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer. Changes in prescribing plans documented before and after the 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) presentation of a Hoosier Oncology Group trial testing the role of consolidation docetaxel chemotherapy in this setting are presented.Results:Data from 2007 show a post-ASCO shift away from plans for docetaxel consolidation, increased use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone, and stable to increased plans for concurrent chemoradiation followed by additional cycles of the chemotherapy used during concurrent management (20%). Preliminary data from 2008 confirm the durability of these changes.Conclusions:The findings of the Hoosier Oncology Group trial support a transition away from docetaxel consolidation. A trend in this direction among American medical oncologists is clear from our data. However, nearly 20% of oncologists studied in 2008 still plan to use docetaxel consolidation. Furthermore, a majority of those studied after ASCO 2007 continue to report plans to use more than two cycles of chemotherapy as part of their preferred treatment recommendation despite no level I evidence to support this approach

Reinforcement Learning Strategies for Clinical Trials in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

Typical regimens for advanced metastatic stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) consist of multiple lines of treatment. We present an adaptive reinforcement learning approach to discover optimal individualized treatment regimens from a specially designed clinical trial (a “clinical reinforcement trial”) of an experimental treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC who have not been treated previously with systemic therapy. In addition to the complexity of the problem of selecting optimal compounds for first and second-line treatments based on prognostic factors, another primary goal is to determine the optimal time to initiate second-line therapy, either immediately or delayed after induction therapy, yielding the longest overall survival time. A reinforcement learning method called Q-learning is utilized which involves learning an optimal regimen from patient data generated from the clinical reinforcement trial. Approximating the Q-function with time-indexed parameters can be achieved by using a modification of support vector regression which can utilize censored data. Within this framework, a simulation study shows that the procedure can extract optimal regimens for two lines of treatment directly from clinical data without prior knowledge of the treatment effect mechanism. In addition, we demonstrate that the design reliably selects the best initial time for second-line therapy while taking into account the heterogeneity of NSCLC across patients

RET Rearrangements in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Radiation

Background:RET rearrangement, a hallmark of radiation-induced thyroid cancer, has been reported to occur in 1% of lung adenocarcinoma patients. Patients with this rearrangement tend to be younger and never smokers, raising a possibility of other causes, such as radiation. We hypothesized that RET chromosomal rearrangement may represent a genetic mechanism of radiation-induced lung cancer.Methods:Two hundred forty-five consecutive primary lung adenocarcinomas without history of radiation and 38 lung adenocarcinoma patients with a history of therapeutic radiation for breast carcinoma or mediastinal Hodkgin lymphoma were tested for RET rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Human lung adenocarcinoma cells (201T) were subjected to γ radiation and tested for RET gene fusions by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and Southern blot hybridization.Results:We identified one case with RET rearrangement in the group without history of radiation (1 of 240; 0.4%) and two cases in the group with history of radiation (2 of 37; 5.4%; P=0.0436). Both these patients were women, who were former smokers with a history of breast carcinoma treated with surgery and radiation. Furthermore, we found that RET fusions could be directly induced in 201T human lung cells by exposure to 1 Gy of γ radiation. All fusions identified were between RET and KIF5B genes, and no RET fusions to CCDC6 or NCOA4 genes, characteristic for thyroid cancer, were identified in the irradiated lung cells.Conclusion:RET fusions may represent a genetic mechanism of radiation-induced lung adenocarcinoma

Phase II Trial of Weekly Dose-Dense Paclitaxel in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 39901

INTRODUCTION: Paclitaxel is an active agent in extensive-stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Nevertheless, the optimal schedule is uncertain. A dose-dense schedule was previously evaluated in a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study of patients with non-SCLC, resulting in a 42% response rate and median survival of 12.3 months. Because of these promising results, this dose and schedule of paclitaxel was evaluated in patients with ES-SCLC. METHODS: Patients were eligible for this phase II trial (Cancer and Leukemia Group B 39901) if they had documented ES-SCLC, no prior chemotherapy, and performance status of 0 to 2. Paclitaxel was administered as an intravenous infusion at 150 mg/m2 over 3 hours weekly for 6 consecutive weeks every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with median age of 65 were enrolled. Of them 25 were men and 33 with a performance status 0 to 1. A median of two 8-week cycles were delivered. The percent of patients with grade 3/4 toxicity included neutropenia 22%, anemia 9%, febrile neutropenia 6%, fatigue 20%, sensory neuropathy 26%, motor neuropathy 11%, and dyspnea 17%. There were two treatment-related deaths, both from pneumonitis. The overall response rate was 33% (3% complete response and 30% partial response). Median progression-free and overall survivals were 3.7 and 9.2 months, respectively. One-year progression-free and overall survivals were 17% and 36%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with ES-SCLC, dose-dense weekly paclitaxel was associated with fairly mild hematologic toxicity. Nevertheless, nonhematologic toxicities, including neuropathy, fatigue, and dyspnea required frequent dose delays and reductions. The overall response rate is disappointing and much lower than that seen with standard platinum-based combinations. Paclitaxel in this dose and schedule should not be used as front-line therapy for patients with ES-SCLC

Beliefs among Physicians in the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach to Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

No Abstract