4 research outputs found

    Utility Scores and Treatment Preferences for Clinical Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

    Get PDF
    AbstractObjectivesTo determine utility scores for health states relevant to the treatment of early-stage, high-risk cervical cancer.MethodsSeven descriptive health states incorporating the physical and emotional aspects of medical treatment, recovery, and prognosis were developed. Forty-five female volunteers valuated each health state using the visual analogue score (VAS) and time trade off (TTO) methods. Treatment options were ranked by mean and median TTO scores. The 95% confidence intervals were calculated to determine the statistical significance of ranking preferences. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare central tendencies related to age, race, parity, and subject history of abnormal cervical cytology.ResultsVAS and TTO scores were highly correlated. Volunteers ranked minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with low-risk features as most preferred (mean TTO = 0.96; median TTO = 1.00) and aborted radical hysterectomy followed by chemoradiation as least preferred (mean TTO = 0.69; median TTO = 0.83). Health states that included radical surgery were ranked higher than those that included chemoradiation, either in the adjuvant or primary setting. When survival was comparable, volunteers rated radical hysterectomy with high-risk pathology followed by adjuvant chemoradiation (mean TTO = 0.78; median TTO = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.69–0.87) similarly to chemoradiation alone (mean TTO = 0.76; median TTO 0.90; 95% CI: 0.66–0.86; p = NS). Utility scores for the majority of health states were not significantly associated with age, race, parity, or subject history of abnormal cervical cytology.ConclusionSubjects consistently preferred surgical excision to treat early-stage, high-risk cervical cancer and chose a minimally invasive approach. Such utility scores can be used to incorporate quality-of-life effects into comparative-effectiveness models for cervical cancer

    Improving the Management of an Advanced Extrauterine Pregnancy Using Pelvic Arteriography in a Hybrid Operating Suite

    Get PDF
    Advanced extrauterine pregnancy is an extremely rare, life-threatening pregnancy complication. Management of these pregnancies presents significant challenges, especially when they have progressed to an advanced stage of fetal viability. With high rates of maternal and fetal mortality associated with this complication, delivery or pregnancy interruption should be expedited following diagnosis. Localization of the placenta and its blood supply is critical to preoperative planning. Hybrid operating suites that can accommodate a multidisciplinary team of subspecialists may improve the chance of a successful outcome with this rare complication

    Predictors of failed trial of labor among women with an extremely obese body mass index.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine predictors associated with cesarean delivery (CD) among extremely obese women undergoing a trial of labor (TOL). STUDY DESIGN: Using a delivery database, we identified all pregnant women delivering at our institution from Jan. 1, 2008, through July 31, 2010, weighing \u3e275 lb at the time of delivery who attempted a TOL with a singleton gestation \u3e34 weeks\u27 gestation. Demographic and obstetrical factors were compared for those having a successful vaginal delivery to those having a CD. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 357 pregnant women who weighed \u3e275 lb (all with body mass index [BMI] \u3e40 kg/m(2)), and among these, 248 (69.5%) attempted a TOL. Women having a CD had a greater BMI (51.6 vs 49.9 kg/m(2), P = .038), were less likely to be parous (32.2% vs 65.8%, P \u3c .0001), and were more likely to be induced (80.5% vs 57.8%) compared to those having a vaginal delivery. Using a multivariable logistic regression model, among nulliparous women, maternal age, parity, and cervical dilation at time of admission were independent predictors for CD. Furthermore, an increase in BMI of 10 kg/m(2) was associated with a 3.5 increased odds (P = .002) for CD. CONCLUSION: Among nulliparous extremely obese women attempting a TOL, BMI was an independent predictor of CD, with the rate of CD increasing further with increasing BMI. The underlying mechanisms for failed TOL in the setting of maternal obesity remain largely unknown
    corecore