Using Microanalysis (MFD) to Teach & Train Students

Microanalysis of face-to-face dialogue (MFD), that is, the detailed and replicable examination of any aspect of observable communicative behavior as it occurs, moment by moment, in a face-to-face dialogue (Bavelas, Gerwing, Healing, & Tomori, 2016) to examine professional conversations. MFD is an inductive methodology which uses detailed operational definitions and analysis rules, rather than relying on subjective judgment, to produce high inter-analyst agreement (Bavelas et al., 2016). MFD principles are applicable to teaching, training, and supervising clinicians in our CFT program.https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/btp_expo/1061/thumbnail.jp

A Journey to Accountability

The Journal of Solution Focused Practices (JSFP) underwent structural changes in 2019 as a result of a new editorial team. These changes occurred as a result of prioritizing equitable access to knowledge and leadership in the SF community. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the process of relaunching JSFP as an inclusive international journal. Two major initiatives are described. A renewal and alignment of purpose of the Editorial Board and the development of the journal’s Mission and Values statement. Both initiatives took place within the context of developing accountability for inclusivity, diversity and accessibility

The Validation of Solution Building Inventory in the Turkish Population

This study aims to adapt Solution Building Inventory (SBI) to Turkish and examine its psychometric properties. The study group consisted of 278 individuals (195 females and 83 males), whose age range was between 18 and 23 years old. Solution Building Inventory, Dispositional Hope Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used as measurements. The results of the exploratory factor analysis showed the suitability of the data for factor analysis and revealed a two-factor structure explaining 49.38% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis findings showed that the model had a good fit in the 11-item and two-dimensional structure of the scale. Besides, the correlation coefficients of the relationship between the SBI and other scales were expectedly provided equivalent and convergent validity. In reliability analyzes, the Cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be .85 for the scale in general, while it was calculated as .78 for the supporting solutions sub-dimension and .85 for the creating solutions sub-dimension. As a result, SBI is a measurement tool with proven validity and reliability in Turkish

The Validation of Solution Building Inventory in the Turkish Population

تعیین اعتبار فهرست‌سازی راه‌حل‌ها در جمعیت ترک زبان این مطالعه با هدف تطبیق فهرست‌سازی راه‌حل در ترک زبانان و بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی آن انجام شده است. گروه مطالعه شده شامل 278 نفر (195 زن و 83 مرد) با میانگین سنی 18-23 سال بود. فهرست‌سازی راه‌حل ، مقیاس امید ذاتی و مقیاس تاثیر مثبت و منفی به عنوان ابزارهای اندازه‌گیری استفاده شدند. نتایج تحلیل عامل اکتشافی، تناسب داده‌ها با تحلیل عوامل و ساختار دو عامله را نشان داد که 49.38% از واریانس کل می‌باشد. یافته‌های تحلیل‌ عامل تاکیدی نشان داد که این مدل با ساختار دو بعدی 11 آیتمی این مقیاس، تناسب خوبی دارد. علاوه بر این، انتظار می‌رود ضرایب همبستگی روابط بین فهرست‌سازی راه‌حل و دیگر مقیاس‌ها، اعتباری معادل و همگرا ارائه دهد. در تحلیل‌های قابل اعتماد، ضریب هماهنگی داخلی آلفای کرونباخ برای این مقیاس 0.85 در مقیاس کل بود. در حالی که برای سیستم‌های حمایتی فرعی 0.78 و برای سیستم ایجاد شده فرعی 0.85 محاسبه شد. در نتیجه، فهرست‌سازی راه‌حل بعنوان ابزار اندازه‌گیری برای اثبات اعتبار و قابلیت اطمینان در ترک زبانان است