Sustainability assessment of electrokinetic bioremediation compared with alternative remediation options for a petroleum release site

Sustainable management practices can be applied to the remediation of contaminated land to maximise the economic, environmental and social benefits of the process. The Sustainable Remediation Forum UK (SuRF-UK) have developed a framework to support the implementation of sustainable practices within contaminated land management and decision making. This study applies the framework, including qualitative (Tier 1) and semi-quantitative (Tier 2) sustainability assessments, to a complex site where the principal contaminant source is unleaded gasoline, giving rise to a dissolved phase BTEX and MTBE plume. The pathway is groundwater migration through a chalk aquifer and the receptor is a water supply borehole. A hydraulic containment system (HCS) has been installed to manage the MTBE plume migration. The options considered to remediate the MTBE source include monitored natural attenuation (MNA), air sparging/soil vapour extraction (AS/SVE), pump and treat (PT) and electrokinetic-enhanced bioremediation (EK-BIO). A sustainability indictor set from the SuRF-UK framework, including priority indicator categories selected during a stakeholder engagement workshop, was used to frame the assessments. At Tier 1 the options are ranked based on qualitative supporting information, whereas in Tier 2 a multi-criteria analysis is applied. Furthermore, the multi-criteria analysis was refined for scenarios where photovoltaics (PVs) are included and amendments are excluded from the EK-BIO option. Overall, the analysis identified AS/SVE and EK-BIO as more sustainable remediation options at this site than either PT or MNA. The wider implications of this study include: (1) an appraisal of the management decision from each Tier of the assessment with the aim to highlight areas for time and cost savings for similar assessments in the future; (2) the observation that EK-BIO performed well against key indicator categories compared to the other intensive treatments; and (3) introducing methods to improve the sustainability of the EK-BIO treatment design (such as PVs) did not have a significant effect in this instance

Prioritisation of abstraction boreholes at risk from chlorinated solvent contamination on the UK Permo-Triassic Sandstone aquifer using a GIS

A 250 km(2) area of the Permo-Triassic Sandstone aquifer in the West Midlands of England, UK, was selected as a test region for the development of a geographic information system (GIS)-based risk assessment methodology that incorporates contaminant source, groundwater vulnerability and groundwater abstraction catchment elements in order to prioritise areas and boreholes potentially at risk from chlorinated solvent pollution on a regional scale. Factors incorporated in the vulnerability assessment include the nature of soils, presence or absence of superficial or glacial deposits, fault density and depth to water table. ARCVIEW GIS was employed with a simple ranking system from which the derived vulnerability assessment index was combined with current chlorinated solvent user industry data and source protection zone components. Results indicate the presence of high-risk areas in urban locations where locally dense distributions of chlorinated solvent user industries combine with high vulnerability aquifers within the catchment of supply boreholes. Ranking of catchment-specific risk reveals the abstraction points under greatest stress. The proposed methodology has applications as a regional-scale initial screening tool to guide site selection for regulatory inspections and assist in prioritising monitoring strategies for existing boreholes. Future developments will provide guidance for locating new urban boreholes in areas of lowest risk

Techniques for analysis of neuronal interactions

This article discusses the use of neurone simulation models to improve understanding of analytical methods for analysis of neuronal interactions and to improve our ability to correctly interpret results obtained form experimental data

An illustrated handbook of DNAPL transport and fate in the subsurface

Executive summary Dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) such as creosote, coal tar, chlorinated solvents and polychlorinated biphenyl oils represent a particular class of soil and groundwater contaminant that exist as a separate liquid phase in the presence of water. DNAPLs come to rest in the subsurface as disconnected blobs and ganglia of liquid referred to as residual DNAPL, and in potentially mobile distributions referred to as pools. The region of the subsurface containing residual and pooled DNAPL is referred to as the source zone. Groundwater flowing through the source zone slowly dissolves the DNAPL, giving rise to aqueous phase plumes of contamination hydraulically down-gradient of the source zone. Some DNAPL compounds are resistant to biodegradation and sorb little; they can therefore give rise to substantial aqueous phase plumes. Other DNAPL compounds are relatively immobile in groundwater and, therefore, are highly retarded relative to the rate of groundwater flow. In unsaturated media, volatile DNAPLs give rise to vapour phase contamination. Because DNAPLs are only slightly soluble in water, DNAPL source zones can persist for many decades and, in some cases, even hundreds of years. Some DNAPLs are highly toxic and even very low concentrations in groundwater or the atmosphere can pose an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment. The fact that DNAPLs are denser than water allows them to migrate to substantial depths below the water table in both unconsolidated deposits and fractured bedrock. Delineating the spatial extent of the DNAPL source zone at a site can be a substantial undertaking, requiring at times several years of investigation and significant financial resources. Remediation strategies are site-specific, with separate approaches often warranted for the DNAPL source zone and its associated aqueous phase plume. There has been limited success in removing all DNAPL from below the water table at sites, particularly in a fractured rock environment. Remediation strategies are therefore often directed towards source zone containment or stabilisation, partial mass removal, plume management or plume interception, within the framework of appropriate risk-management objectives. The purpose of this handbook is to provide a user-friendly overview of the nature of DNAPL contamination in a UK context. It is intended to assist site investigators, site owners and regulators in conducting site investigations, conducting risk assessments and selecting remediation approaches. While this handbook reflects the state-of-the-art at the time of publication, it should be noted that the discipline of groundwater and soil contamination by hazardous organic liquids is evolving continuously and is relatively ‘young’ compared with many other areas of science and engineering. Readers are therefore advised to keep abreast of the new advances in understanding and approaches expected in the foreseeable future

Introduction to the Stone Cycle and the Conservation of Historic Buildings

This Thematic Set of papers relating to the life cycle of building stone was initiated by a call for papers in order to better recognize the contribution that the disciplines, and practitioners, of engineering geology and hydrogeology make to the conservation of historical buildings, which is intrinsically multidisciplinary. The call for papers particularly focused upon the issues of different stone types used in historical buildings, as well as the performance, durability and conservation of stone in historical settings. The response was overwhelming, with many more abstracts submitted than could possibly be published in the Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (QJEGH). Accordingly, the papers were divided into two sets, with one set destined to appear in QJEGH as described herein and the second set to appear in a Geological Society Special Publication (Cassar et al. 2014). The presence of a particular paper in one set or the other is not a reflection on quality, but merely a reflection of the need to divide the papers into two sets each of which reflects subtly differing themes. History has been written in stone, from prehistoric monuments to modern-day buildings, and all types of stone, limestones and sandstones, granites and marbles, have been utilized to build, to clad, and to decorate. The buildings that are symbols of a city, a region, or a country are mostly built of stone. We immediately think of England when we see an image of Stonehenge; the Acropolis symbolizes Athens; the Coliseum Rome; Machu Picchu Peru; and the Taj Mahal India

Replacement stones for Lede stone in Belgian historical monuments

The Lede stone (Lutetian, Eocene) is an important historic building stone used in the NW of Belgium. In Ghent, it is dominant in the post-Romanesque built cultural heritage. Its use was restricted several times by socio-economic constraints. Since quarrying and production started to cease from the seventeenth century, periodic revivals favoured the use of Lede stone for new buildings and restoration projects. Sulphation is the main threat for the Lede stone as black crusts are the most common degradation phenomena on this arenaceous limestone. Around the turn of the nineteenth century, the Belgian Gobertange stone was the most widely used replacement material. Throughout the twentieth century, the use of replacement material shifted towards French limestones. However, their colour, texture and petrophysical properties differ from the Lede stone, for which a natural yellow-brown patina is very characteristic. In order to solve this mainly aesthetic issue, several new stone types are used as replacement stone in the twenty-first century, while many others have been suggested. It remains, however, difficult to find a replacement stone that matches the visual and petrophysical properties of the Lede stone. One remaining Lede stone quarry pit has increased its activity since 2011, offering the opportunity to use new Lede stone as replacement stone

Replacement stones for Lede stone in Belgian historical monuments

The Lede stone (Lutetian, Eocene) is an important historic building stone used in the NW of Belgium. In Ghent, it is dominant in the post-Romanesque built cultural heritage. Its use was restricted several times by socio-economic constraints. Since quarrying and production started to cease from the seventeenth century, periodic revivals favoured the use of Lede stone for new buildings and restoration projects. Sulphation is the main threat for the Lede stone as black crusts are the most common degradation phenomena on this arenaceous limestone. Around the turn of the nineteenth century, the Belgian Gobertange stone was the most widely used replacement material. Throughout the twentieth century, the use of replacement material shifted towards French limestones. However, their colour, texture and petrophysical properties differ from the Lede stone, for which a natural yellow-brown patina is very characteristic. In order to solve this mainly aesthetic issue, several new stone types are used as replacement stone in the twenty-first century, while many others have been suggested. It remains, however, difficult to find a replacement stone that matches the visual and petrophysical properties of the Lede stone. One remaining Lede stone quarry pit has increased its activity since 2011, offering the opportunity to use new Lede stone as replacement stone