Alcohol septal ablation or mavacamten for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic disease characterized by an increased left ventricular wall thickness in the absence of increased afterload conditions. In addition to diastolic dysfunction, obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract is common in HCM and has an important influence on symptoms and outcome. Over the last five decades or two decades, respectively, surgical myectomy and alcohol septal ablation were the only therapeutic options if standard medical care was not sufficient. Recently, a new option has become available that has the potential to revolutionize the therapeutic strategies for patients with HCM. Mavacamten is a myosin inhibitor that belongs to a completely new drug class and targets the excessive actin–myosin cross-bridging that is the underlying pathology of HCM. By reducing the actin–myosin interactions, mavacamten not only reduces the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction but also seems to have positive effects on the diastolic function, microcirculation, and cardiac structure. This article summarizes the current evidence on alcohol septal ablation and reviews the preclinical and clinical data on mavacamten for the treatment of patients with obstructive HCM

Impact of sheath diameter of different sheath types on vascular complications and mortality in transfemoral TAVI approaches using the Proglide closure device.

Evaluation of the impact of the sheath diameter on vascular complications and mortality in transfemoral aortic valve implantation.Between 2012 and 2014, 183 patients underwent the procedure using a sheath diameter of 18-24 F. This collective was divided into two groups: group 1, with a sheath diameter of 18F (G1, n = 94), consisted of patients with 18F Medtronic Sentrant and 18 F Direct Flow sheaths, and group 2 with a sheath diameter of 19-24 F (G2, n = 89) consisted of patients with Edwards expandable e-sheath and Solopath sheaths. Perclose-Proglide® was used as a closure device in all patients.G1 had significantly more female patients (64.9% vs. 46.1% in G2, p = 0.01) and the average BMI was lower (26 ± 4.5% vs. 27.4 ± 4.7%, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in the incidence of major and minor vascular complications (G1: 12.8% vs. G2: 12.4%, p = 0.9). 30-day mortality was similar in both groups (G1: 6.4 ± 2.5% [95% CI: 0.88-0.98], G2: 3.7 ± 1.9% [95% CI: 0.92-0.99]. The Kaplan Meier analysis of survival revealed no significant differences either.The difference in sheath diameter had no effect on either incidence or severity of vascular complications. There was no impact on mortality either