Health Literacy and eHealth:Challenges and Strategies

Given the impact of health literacy (HL) on patients' outcomes, limited health literacy is a major barrier to improve cancer care globally. HL refers to the degree in which an individual is able to acquire, process, and comprehend information in a way to be actively involved in their health decisions. Previous research found that almost half of the population in developed countries have difficulties in understanding health-related information. With the gradual shift toward the shared decision making process and digital transformation in oncology, the need for addressing low HL issues is crucial. Decision making in oncology is often accompanied by considerable consequences on patients' lives, which requires patients to understand complex information and be able to compare treatment methods by considering their own values. How health information is perceived by patients is influenced by various factors including patients' characteristics and the way information is presented to patients. Currently, identifying patients with low HL and simple data visualizations are the best practice to help patients and clinicians in dealing with limited health literacy. Furthermore, using eHealth, as well as involving HL mediators, supports patients to make sense of complex information

Percutaneous coronary invervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting:A meta-analysis

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with coronary artery disease. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central were searched, and randomized controlled trials were included. Outcomes were assessed at maximum available follow-up. Results: This meta-analysis includes 31 trials with 15,004 patients. As regards death, more patients died after PCI compared with CABG across all types of patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.3; P = .05) as well as in patients with multivessel disease (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4; P = .02) or diabetes (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.1; P <.01). Myocardial infarction occurred as frequently after PCI (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9-1.5; P = .28). Repeat revascularization was more common after PCI (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 3.5-5.8; P <.01), with a progressive decline in ORs from the pre-stent era (OR, 7.0; 95% CI, 5.1-9.7; P <.01), to the bare metal stent era (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 3.6-5.5; P Conclusions: Compared with PCI, CABG had a lower risk of death in multivessel disease or diabetes patients eligible for either intervention, a lower risk of repeat revascularization, but a higher risk of stroke

COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTINUOUS-FLOW LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICES

Objectives: Mechanical circulatory support through left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improves survival and quality of life for patients with end-stage heart failure who are ineligible for cardiac transplantation. Our aim was to calculate the cost-effectiveness of continuous-flow LVADs. Methods: A cost-utility analysis from a societal perspective was performed. A lifetime Markov model was set up in which continuous-flow LVAD was compared with optimal medical therapy (OMT). The treatment effect was modeled indirectly combining the results of the REMATCH trial comparing OMT with a pulsatile-flow LVAD and the HeartMate II Destination Therapy Trial comparing a pulsatile-flow LVAD with a continuous-flow LVAD. Cost data were based on real-world financial data of sixty-nine patients with a HeartMate II implantation from the University Medical Centre Utrecht (the Netherlands). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Comparing the continuous-flow HeartMate II with OMT, 3.23 (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 2.18-4.49) life-years were gained (LYG) or 2.83 (95 percent CI, 1.91-3.90) quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The cost of an LVAD implant was approximately (sic)126,000, of which the device itself represented the largest cost, being (sic)70,000. Total incremental costs amounted to (sic)299,100 (95 percent CI, 190,500-521,000). This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of (sic)94,100 (95 percent CI, 59,100-160,100) per LYG or (sic)107,600 (95 percent CI, 66,700-181,100) per QALY. Sensitivity analyses showed these results were robust. Conclusions: Although LVAD destination therapy improves survival and quality of life, it remains a relatively expensive intervention which renders the reimbursement of this therapy questionable

Whole exome sequencing in the diagnostic workup of patients with a bleeding diathesis

INTRODUCTION: Bleeding assessment tools and laboratory phenotyping often remain inconclusive in patients with a haemorrhagic diathesis. AIM: To describe the phenotype and genetic profile of patients with a bleeding tendency. METHODS: Whole exome sequencing (WES) was incorporated in the routine diagnostic pathway of patients with thrombocytopenia (n = 17), platelet function disorders (n = 19) and an unexplained bleeding tendency (n = 51). The analysis of a panel of 126 OMIM (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man) genes involved in thrombosis and haemostasis was conducted, and if negative, further exome-wide analysis was performed if informed consent given. RESULTS: Eighteen variants were detected in 15 patients from a total of 87 patients (17%). Causative variants were observed in MYH9 (two cases), SLFN14, P2RY12 and GP9. In addition, one case was considered solved due to combined carriership of F7 and F13A1 variants and one with combined carriership of F2, F8 and VWF, all variants related to secondary haemostasis protein aberrations. Two variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were found in two primary haemostasis genes: GFI1B and VWF. Eight patients were carriers of autosomal recessive disorders. Exome-wide analysis was performed in 54 cases and identified three variants in candidate genes. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, we conclude that performing WES at the end of the diagnostic trajectory can be of additive value to explain the complete bleeding phenotype in patients without a definite diagnosis after conventional laboratory tests. Discovery of combinations of (novel) genes that predispose to bleeding will increase the diagnostic yield in patients with an unexplained bleeding diathesis