The use of high‐flow nasal cannula in the pediatric emergency department

Objectives: To summarize the current literature describing high‐flow nasal cannula use in children, the components and mechanisms of action of a high‐flow nasal cannula system, the appropriate clinical applications, and its role in the pediatric emergency department. Sources: A computer‐based search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar for literature on HFNC use in children was performed. Data summary: High‐flow nasal cannula, a non‐invasive respiratory support modality, provides heated and fully humidified gas mixtures to patients via a nasal cannula interface. High‐flow nasal cannula likely supports respiration though reduced inspiratory resistance, washout of the nasopharyngeal dead space, reduced metabolic work related to gas conditioning, improved airway conductance and mucociliary clearance, and provision of low levels of positive airway pressure. Most data describing high‐flow nasal cannula use in children focuses on those with bronchiolitis, although high‐flow nasal cannula has been used in children with other respiratory disease. Introduction of high‐flow nasal cannula into clinical practice, including in the emergency department, has been associated with decreased rates of endotracheal intubation. Limited prospective interventional data suggest that high‐flow nasal cannula may be similarly efficacious as continuous positive airway pressure and more efficacious than standard oxygen therapy for some patients. Patient characteristics, such as improved tachycardia and tachypnea, have been associated with a lack of progression to endotracheal intubation. Reported adverse effects are rare. Conclusions: High‐flow nasal cannula should be considered for pediatric emergency department patients with respiratory distress not requiring immediate endotracheal intubation; prospective, pediatric emergency department‐specific trials are needed to better determine responsive patient populations, ideal high‐flow nasal cannula settings, and comparative efficacy vs. other respiratory support modalities

The use of high-flow nasal cannula in the pediatric emergency department

Abstract Objectives: To summarize the current literature describing high-flow nasal cannula use in children, the components and mechanisms of action of a high-flow nasal cannula system, the appropriate clinical applications, and its role in the pediatric emergency department. Sources: A computer-based search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar for literature on high-flow nasal cannula use in children was performed. Data summary: High-flow nasal cannula, a non-invasive respiratory support modality, provides heated and fully humidified gas mixtures to patients via a nasal cannula interface. High-flow nasal cannula likely supports respiration though reduced inspiratory resistance, washout of the nasopharyngeal dead space, reduced metabolic work related to gas conditioning, improved airway conductance and mucociliary clearance, and provision of low levels of positive airway pressure. Most data describing high-flow nasal cannula use in children focuses on those with bronchiolitis, although high-flow nasal cannula has been used in children with other respiratory diseases. Introduction of high-flow nasal cannula into clinical practice, including in the emergency department, has been associated with decreased rates of endotracheal intubation. Limited prospective interventional data suggest that high-flow nasal cannula may be similarly efficacious as continuous positive airway pressure and more efficacious than standard oxygen therapy for some patients. Patient characteristics, such as improved tachycardia and tachypnea, have been associated with a lack of progression to endotracheal intubation. Reported adverse effects are rare. Conclusions: High-flow nasal cannula should be considered for pediatric emergency department patients with respiratory distress not requiring immediate endotracheal intubation; prospective, pediatric emergency department-specific trials are needed to better determine responsive patient populations, ideal high-flow nasal cannula settings, and comparative efficacy vs. other respiratory support modalities

Nutritional Support in Children Meeting the At-Risk for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Criteria

IMPORTANCE:. Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) is a prevalent condition in the PICU with a high morbidity and mortality, but effective preventative strategies are lacking. OBJECTIVES:. To examine associations between early enteral nutrition (EN) and PICU outcomes in a cohort of children meeting the 2015 Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference “at-risk” for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARF-PARDS) criteria. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:. This was a single-center, electronic health record-based retrospective chart review. We included children less than or equal to 18 years-old admitted to our mixed medical-surgical PICU from January 2017 to December 2018 who met ARF-PARDS criteria within 48 hours of admission. Children were categorized as receiving “early” EN if feeds were initiated within 48 hours of admission. All others were categorized as “delayed” EN. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:. Extracted data included demographics, illness characteristics including primary diagnosis and Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) III score, respiratory support and oxygenation indices, nutritional data, and PICU length of stay (LOS). The primary outcome of interest was subsequent diagnosis of PARDS. RESULTS:. Of 201 included children, 152 (75.6%) received early EN. The most common admission diagnoses were pneumonia, bronchiolitis, and influenza. Overall, 21.4% (n = 43) of children developed PARDS. Children receiving early EN had a subsequent diagnosis of PARDS less often then children receiving delayed EN (15.1% vs 40.8%; p < 0.001), an association that persisted after adjusting for patient demographics and illness characteristics, including PRISM III and diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.10–0.58; p = 0.002). Early EN was also associated with a shorter PICU LOS in univariate analysis (2.2 d [interquartile range, 1.5–3.4 d] vs 4.2 d [2.7–8.9 d]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:. In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, compared with children with ARF-PARDS who received late EN, those who received early EN demonstrated a reduced odds of subsequent diagnosis of PARDS, and an unadjusted reduction in PICU LOS when compared with delayed EN. Prospective studies should be designed to confirm these findings

Child Opportunity Index and Hospital Utilization in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury Admitted to the PICU

IMPORTANCE:. The need to understand how Community-based disparities impact morbidity and mortality in pediatric critical illness, such as traumatic brain injury. Test the hypothesis that ZIP code-based disparities in hospital utilization, including length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs, exist in a cohort of children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to a PICU using the Child Opportunity Index (COI). DESIGN:. Multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTING:. Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. PATIENTS:. Children 0–18 years old admitted to a PHIS hospital with a diagnosis of TBI from January 2016 to December 2020 requiring PICU care. To identify the most severely injured children, a study-specific definition of “Complicated TBI” was created based on radiology, pharmacy, and procedure codes. INTERVENTIONS:. None. Main Outcomes and Measures:. Using nationally normed ZIP code-level COI data, patients were categorized into COI quintiles. A low COI ZIP code has low childhood opportunity based on weighted indicators within educational, health and environmental, and social and economic domains. Population-averaged generalized estimating equation (GEE) models, adjusted for patient and clinical characteristics examined the association between COI and study outcomes, including hospital LOS and accrued hospital costs. The median age of this cohort of 8,055 children was 58 months (interquartile range [IQR], 8–145 mo). There were differences in patient demographics and rates of Complicated TBI between COI levels. The median hospital LOS was 3.0 days (IQR, 2.0–6.0 d) and in population-averaged GEE models, children living in very low COI ZIP codes were expected to have a hospital LOS 10.2% (95% CI, 4.1–16.8%; p = 0.0142) longer than children living in very high COI ZIP codes. For the 11% of children with a Complicated TBI, the relationship between COI and LOS was lost in multivariable models. COI level was not predictive of accrued hospital costs in this study. CONCLUSIONS:. Children with TBI requiring PICU care living in low-opportunity ZIP codes have higher injury severity and longer hospital LOS compared with children living in higher-opportunity ZIP codes. Additional studies are needed to understand why these differences exist

Measuring Social Health Following Pediatric Critical Illness: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Framework

Objective: Social health is an important component of recovery following critical illness as modeled in the pediatric Post-Intensive Care Syndrome framework. We conducted a scoping review of studies measuring social outcomes (measurable components of social health) following pediatric critical illness and propose a conceptual framework of the social outcomes measured in these studies. Data sources: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Registry Study selection: We identified studies evaluating social outcomes in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) survivors or their families from 1970–2017 as part of a broader scoping review of outcomes after pediatric critical illness. Data extraction: We identified articles by dual review and dual-extracted study characteristics, instruments, and instrument validation and administration information. For instruments used in studies evaluating a social outcome, we collected instrument content and described it using qualitative methods adapted to a scoping review. Data synthesis: Of 407 articles identified in the scoping review, 223 (55%) evaluated a social outcome. The majority were conducted in North America and the United Kingdom, with wide variation in methodology and population. Among these studies, 38 unique instruments were used to evaluate a social outcome. Specific social outcomes measured included individual (independence, attachment, empathy, social behaviors, social cognition, and social interest), environmental (community perceptions and environment), and network (activities and relationships) characteristics, together with school and family outcomes. While many instruments assessed more than one social outcome, no instrument evaluated all areas of social outcome. Conclusions: The full range of social outcomes reported following pediatric critical illness were not captured by any single instrument. The lack of a comprehensive instrument focused on social outcomes may contribute to under-appreciation of the importance of social outcomes and their under-representation in PICU outcomes research. A more comprehensive evaluation of social outcomes will improve understanding of overall recovery following pediatric critical illness.</p

A Core Outcome Measurement Set for Pediatric Critical Care

Objectives: To identify a PICU Core Outcome Measurement Set (PICU COMS), a set of measures that can be used to evaluate the PICU Core Outcome Set (PICU COS) domains in PICU patients and their families. Design: A modified Delphi consensus process. Setting: Four webinars attended by PICU physicians and nurses, pediatric surgeons, rehabilitation physicians, and scientists with expertise in PICU clinical care or research (n = 35). Attendees were from eight countries and convened from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators Pediatric Outcomes STudies after PICU Investigators and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network PICU COS Investigators. Subjects: Measures to assess outcome domains of the PICU COS are as follows: cognitive, emotional, overall (including health-related quality of life), physical, and family health. Measures evaluating social health were also considered. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Measures were classified as general or additional based on generalizability across PICU populations, feasibility, and relevance to specific COS domains. Measures with high consensus, defined as 80% agreement for inclusion, were selected for the PICU COMS. Among 140 candidate measures, 24 were delineated as general (broadly applicable) and, of these, 10 achieved consensus for inclusion in the COMS (7 patient-oriented and 3 family-oriented). Six of the seven patient measures were applicable to the broadest range of patients, diagnoses, and developmental abilities. All were validated in pediatric populations and have normative pediatric data. Twenty additional measures focusing on specific populations or in-depth evaluation of a COS subdomain also met consensus for inclusion as COMS additional measures. Conclusions: The PICU COMS delineates measures to evaluate domains in the PICU COS and facilitates comparability across future research studies to characterize PICU survivorship and enable interventional studies to target long-term outcomes after critical illness.</p