An outbreak of hemodialysis catheter-related bacteremia with sepsis caused by Streptococcus agalactiae in a hemodialysis unit

AbstractBackgroundRates of invasive group B Streptococcus (GBS; Streptococcus agalactiae) disease in adults are on the rise. Invasive GBS disease can be community- or healthcare-associated. We report an outbreak of GBS catheter-related bacteremia in a hemodialysis (HD) unit.Materials and methodsTwo patients undergoing HD at the same outpatient HD unit were admitted on the same day (within a few hours of each other) with catheter-related GBS bacteremia. A retrospective study was undertaken at the HD unit to address risk factors for febrile illness on the last HD session day. A detailed questionnaire was completed by all HD patients treated on the same day as the two GBS patients and by all members of the nursing and medical staff. Medical and nursing records of the HD unit were reviewed, as well as infection control and catheter care practices. Patients and staff members submitted swabs for culture.ResultsNo rectal or vaginal culture of any HD patient or staff member was positive for GBS. The development of recent febrile disease was significantly associated with the presence of a hemodialysis catheter (p=0.028) and care for more than 30min by a specific nurse during the last two HD sessions (p=0.007).ConclusionsWe speculate that the GBS strain was transmitted from one patient to the other through the hands of medical personnel. No such outbreak has ever been reported in HD patients. The importance of strict infection control practices in HD units and the avoidance of catheters for long-term HD should be emphasized

Prevotella Buccae Bacteremia and Febrile Neutropenia: Report of one Case

An increasing number of anaerobic bacteremias of oral origin have been described during the recent years as a cause of fever in neutropenic cancer patients. In this paper, we describe a case of Prevotella buccae bacteremia, the first one to our knowledge, emphasizing thus the importance of considering the oral commensals when selecting antimicrobial regimens

Primary sternal osteomyelitis caused by Nocardia nova: case report and literature review

A 51 year old woman without significant past medical history or risk factors for Nocardia infection developed primary Nocardia nova sternal osteomyelitis with mediastinal abscess, diagnosed with open biopsy. She required prolonged antibiotic therapy and had a favorable outcome. Primary sternal osteomyelitis develops in the absence of a contiguous focus of infection, as opposed to secondary sternal osteomyelitis, which is usually a complication of sternotomy. Staphylococcus aureus probably still is the most common cause of both forms of sternal osteomyelitis. Nocardia species invade humans usually through the respiratory tract and can cause a variety of localized infections through the hematogenous route. Pulmonary involvement may or may not coexist. Immunosuppressed patients are more prone to infection by Nocardia species, although cases involving seemingly immunocompetent patients are not rare. This is the first reported case in the English literature of primary sternal osteomyelitis due to Nocardia nova or any other Nocardia species

Cost Effectiveness of Antibacterial Restriction Strategies in a Tertiary Care University Teaching Hospital

Objective: To compare various strategies for antibacterial administration in terms of patient outcomes, overall costs and quality of care provided. Design: Prospective, nonblind, randomized, clinical study. Setting: Tertiary care hospital in Greece from November 1995 to June 1996. Patients and participants: 458 patients admitted to the internal medicine department who received antibacterial therapy for infectious diseases. Methods: Patients were randomized into 4 different antibacterial administration policies defined by various levels of restriction control. Efficacy and resource use data were obtained from clinical study case report forms, the hospital financial database and physician expert opinion. Outcomes included complete infection control, disease improvement, unchanged patient condition, infection needing surgical treatment, and death. Direct medical costs were estimated. The perspective adopted was that of the healthcare system (hospital budget; third-party payor). Cost-minimisation analysis was based on cost per patient treated. Results: 382 eligible patient records examined showed no significant difference in clinical outcomes among patient groups. Baseline analysis showed the strict antibacterial control policy to produce statistically significant differences (pAntibacterials, Bacterial infections, Cost analysis, Pharmacoeconomics

Fatal Rhizopus Pneumonia in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Patients Despite Posaconazole Prophylaxis: Two Cases and Review of the Literature

Posaconazole is a triazole with broad spectrum of activity against multiple fungi including members of the fungal order Mucorales. This activity has been shown both in clinical and in vitro studies, which are critically reviewed here. It has become very popular in prophylaxis in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) induction and in the graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) settings after 2 recent prospective trials that showed advantage of posaconazole prophylaxis compared to fluconazole or itraconazole. In this report, 2 patients are presented, in whom, despite posaconazole prophylaxis, invasive and ultimately fatal Rhizopus pulmonary infections developed. These cases are similar to a previously reported case of Rhizopus infection in a stem cell transplant recipient who also received posaconazole, indicating a potential newly recognized pattern of breakthrough infections in patients receiving posaconazole prophylaxis

Length of exposure to the hospital environment is more important than antibiotic exposure in healthcare associated infections by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a comparative study

OBJECTIVES: Both total antimicrobial use and specific antimicrobials have been implicated as risk factors for healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HCA-MRSA) infection. The aims of this study were: (I) to explore predictors of a new HCA-MRSA infection in comparison with a new healthcare-associated methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (HCA-MSSA); (II) to thoroughly assess the role of recent antibiotic use qualitatively and quantitatively. METHODS: The time-period for our study was from October 1997 through September 2001. Through applying strict criteria, we identified two groups of inpatients, one with a new HCA-MRSA infection and one with a new HCA-MSSA infection. We recorded demographic, clinical and antibiotic use-related data up to 30 days before the positive culture date. RESULTS: We identified 127 and 70 patients for each group, respectively. Two logistic regression models were carried out to assess the role of antimicrobial use (qualitatively and quantitatively). In model I, duration of hospital stay, presence of chronic wounds, aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone use retained statistical significance. In model II, duration of hospital stay and history of intubation during the last month stood out as the only significant predictors of a subsequent HCA-MRSA infection. No significant differences in outcome were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The length of exposure to the hospital environment may be the best predictor of a new HCA-MRSA infection. Use of aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones may also stand independently along with presence of chronic ulcers and surgical procedures. No independent association between quantitative antibiotic use and subsequent HCA-MRSA infection was documented