Mitoxantrone and ametantrone induce interstrand cross-links in DNA of tumour cells

We show here that mitoxantrone and ametantrone induce interstrand DNA cross-links in HeLa S3cells. These cross-links were observed only in cellular system suggesting that metabolism of the drugs is a necessary step leading to DNA cross-linking. Biologically inactive analogue of mitoxantrone, compound NSC 321458, did not induce cross-links in DNA of tumour cells which suggests that DNA cross-linking is associated with the cytotoxic and anti-tumour activity of these compounds. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaig

H2AX Phosphorylation: Its Role in DNA Damage Response and Cancer Therapy

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most deleterious DNA lesions, which, if left unrepaired, may have severe consequences for cell survival, as they lead to chromosome aberrations, genomic instability, or cell death. Various physical, chemical, and biological factors are involved in DSB induction. Cells respond to DNA damage by activating the so-called DNA damage response (DDR), a complex molecular mechanism developed to detect and repair DNA damage. The formation of DSBs triggers activation of many factors, including phosphorylation of the histone variant H2AX, producing γH2AX. Phosphorylation of H2AX plays a key role in DDR and is required for the assembly of DNA repair proteins at the sites containing damaged chromatin as well as for activation of checkpoints proteins which arrest the cell cycle progression. In general, analysis of γH2AX expression can be used to detect the genotoxic effect of different toxic substances. When applied to clinical samples from cancer patients, evaluation of γH2AX levels may allow not only to monitor the efficiency of anticancer treatment but also to predict of tumor cell sensitivity to DNA damaging anticancer agents and toxicity of anticancer treatment toward normal cells

Induction of unique structural changes in guanine-rich DNA regions by the triazoloacridone C-1305, a topoisomerase II inhibitor with antitumor activities

We recently reported that the antitumor triazoloacridone, compound C-1305, is a topoisomerase II poison with unusual properties. In this study we characterize the DNA interactions of C-1305 in vitro, in comparison with other topoisomerase II inhibitors. Our results show that C-1305 binds to DNA by intercalation and possesses higher affinity for GC- than AT-DNA as revealed by surface plasmon resonance studies. Chemical probing with DEPC indicated that C-1305 induces structural perturbations in DNA regions with three adjacent guanine residues. Importantly, this effect was highly specific for C-1305 since none of the other 22 DNA interacting drugs tested was able to induce similar structural changes in DNA. Compound C-1305 induced stronger structural changes in guanine triplets at higher pH which suggested that protonation/deprotonation of the drug is important for this drug-specific effect. Molecular modeling analysis predicts that the zwitterionic form of C-1305 intercalates within the guanine triplet, resulting in widening of both DNA grooves and aligning of the triazole ring with the N7 atoms of guanines. Our results show that C-1305 binds to DNA and induces very specific and unusual structural changes in guanine triplets which likely plays an important role in the cytotoxic and antitumor activity of this unique compound

Tenascin C interacts with Ecto-5′-nucleotidase (eN) and regulates adenosine generation in cancer cells

Tenascin C is expressed in invasive human solid tumors; however its specific role in cancer biology remains obscure. Previously, we have found that ecto-5'-nucleotidase (eN) is a marker of ER (-) breast carcinoma and elevated expression correlates with invasive mesenchymal cell phenotype. To investigate for the potential relationship between eN and protein components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) we measured adenosine generation from AMP in cells incubated with soluble ECM proteins. We found that tenascin C was the only ECM component that strongly inhibited ecto-5'-nucleotidase (eN) activity in situ and adenosine generation from AMP (75% inhibition, p < 0.01). The inhibition was comparable to that induced by concanavalin A, a well-defined and strong inhibitor of eN. Resin immobilized tenascin C, but not collagen, and only weakly fibronectin, specifically and quantitatively bound cell-extracted eN. We further developed breast cancer cell line with reduced eN expression and tested changes in cell adhesion on different ECM. Breast cancer cells expressing reduced eN attached 56% weaker (p < 0.05) to immobilized tenascin C. This difference was not detected with other ECM proteins. Finally, control breast cancer cells migrated slower on tenascin C when compared with clone with reduced eN expression. These data suggest that eN is a novel and specific receptor for tenascin C and that the interaction between these proteins may influence cell adhesion and migration and also lead to decreased generation of local adenosine