4 research outputs found
Human periodontal mechanoreceptors : Functional properties and role in jaw motor control
Periodontal mechanoreceptors signal information about tooth loads to the
central nervous system and are considered to be important for the control
of oral motor behaviors, like biting and chewing. Surprisingly, very
little is known about the functional properties of periodontal
mechanoreceptors at posterior teeth. In this thesis, the technique of
microneurography was used on humans to record from single nerve fibers in
the inferior alveolar nerve responding to forces applied to the teeth.
The basic discharge patterns of human periodontal mechanoreceptors of
posterior teeth were analyzed. Receptive field properties, directional
sensitivity and encoding of force amplitude and rate were studied.
Further, to evaluate the strength of the synaptic coupling between
periodontal afferents (and other orofacial mechanoreceptive afferents)
and jaw muscle motoneurones, the microneurography technique was combined
with electromyography recordings. Finally, in behavioral experiments, the
importance of periodontal mechanoreceptors in the regulation of force
levels used to hold and split morsels between different types of teeth
was attested.
The present results indicate that the innervation of the periodontal
ligament is weaker for the posterior teeth compared to the anterior
teeth. When the posterior teeth were loaded, all periodontal afferents
responded with a slowly adapting response, i.e., they all continued to
discharge during sustained tooth loads in at least one direction. The
teeth were stimulated in six different directions in the horizontal and
vertical planes and the afferents typically responded in two to four of
the six directions. However, distally along the dental arch, the
afferents showed weaker sensitivity in the vertical directions and a bias
in disto-lingual direction for the 1st molar. When stimulating teeth
adjacent to the receptor bearing tooth (RBT) about half of the afferents
responded to loading of one or two more teeth. This is most likely due to
transmission of forces to the RBT because of interdental contacts between
the teeth. Thus, mechanical coupling between teeth rather than branching
of single nerve fibers explains the multiple-tooth receptive fields.
The majority of the afferents of posterior teeth exhibited a marked
curved relationship between the steady-state discharge rate and the
amplitude of the stimulated force, featuring a pronounced saturation
tendency. Compared to afferents from anterior teeth, these afferents were
less sensitive at low force levels. The afferents of posterior teeth were
also characterized by a decline in the dynamic sensitivity with
increasing force. A quantitative model based on this data revealed that
these afferents poorly encode the magnitude of stronger chewing forces.
However, a minority of the afferents showed a nearly linear
stimulus-response relationship and a small decline in dynamic sensitivity
with increased tooth load. Thus, this afferent group will continue to
reflect the force profile during higher chewing forces.
Strong synaptic coupling between single periodontal afferents and
motoneurons of the jaw muscles demonstrated the importance of these
receptors for a successful execution of oral function, like mastication.
This coupling was mainly unilateral except for the central incisor.
The use of periodontal afferent signals in controlling manipulative and
power elements of a biting behavior was studied in a simple
hold-and-split task using different types of teeth. The forces used to
hold the morsel between the teeth increased distally along the dental
arch. Importantly, the difference in hold forces for the various teeth
could be explained by the different sensitivity characteristics of the
periodontal
afferents innervating anterior and posterior teeth. Blocking the sensory
input from periodontal afferents increased the magnitude and variability
of the hold forces for all types of teeth suggesting that periodontal
afferent information is important for the fine motor regulation of the
jaw when morsels are manipulated and positioned between the teeth to be
prepared for chewing
Encoding of Amplitude and Rate of Tooth Loads by Human Periodontal Afferents From Premolar and Molar Teeth
Receptive Field Properties of Human Periodontal Afferents Responding to Loading of Premolar and Molar Teeth
A study on synaptic coupling between single orofacial mechanoreceptors and human masseter muscle
The original publication can be found at www.springerlink.comThe connection between individual orofacial mechanoreceptive afferents and the motoneurones that innervate jaw muscles is not well established. For example, although electrical and mechanical stimulation of orofacial afferents in bulk evokes responses in the jaw closers, whether similar responses can be evoked in the jaw muscles from the discharge of type identified single orofacial mechanoreceptive afferents is not known. Using tungsten microelectrodes, we have recorded from 28 afferents in the inferior alveolar nerve and 21 afferents in the lingual nerve of human volunteers. We have used discharges of single orofacial afferents as the triggers and the electromyogram (EMG) of the masseter as the source to generate spike-triggered averaged records to illustrate time-based EMG modulation by the nerve discharge. We have then used cross correlation analysis to quantify the coupling. Furthermore, we have also used coherence analysis to study frequency-based relationship between the nerve spike trains and the EMG. The discharge patterns of the skin and mucosa receptors around the lip and the gingiva generated significant modulation in EMGs with a success rate of 40% for both cross correlation and coherence analyses. The discharge patterns of the periodontal mechanoreceptors (PMRs) generated more coupling with a success rate of 70% for cross correlation and about 35% for coherence analyses. Finally, the discharges of the tongue receptors displayed significant coupling with the jaw muscle motoneurones with a success rate of about 40% for both analyses. Significant modulation of the jaw muscles by single orofacial receptors suggests that they play important roles in controlling the jaw muscle activity so that mastication and speech functions are executed successfully.Kemal S. Türker, Skjalg E. Johnsen, Paul F. Sowman and Mats Trulsso