11 research outputs found

    Pilot and Passenger Injuries Associated with Powered Parachutes

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Powered parachutes are becoming a popular form of sport flying. No previous study has reviewed injuries in this sport. The purpose of this study was to describe the injuries associated with powered parachute flying, the flight factors involved in an incident, and the impact an incident has on current sport involvement. METHODS: National Transportation Safety Board incident reports involving powered parachutes between 2004 and 2015 were reviewed. Internet searches were performed to contact involved pilots to find further information. RESULTS: There were 71 incidents reported involving 117 people. Of these, 10 incidents involved 14 fatalities (12.0%). Of the 14 fatalities, 11 (78.5%) occurred in midflight. Pilot error was the most common finding for an incident and accounted for 53/71 incidents (74.6%). The main error was misjudging the distance required for takeoff and landing.This accounted for 37/71 incidents (52.1%). Orthopedic extremity injuries were the most common severe injuries reported. Surgical intervention was needed in 43.8% of injuries and 48.0% of those involved fractures. The median return to work was 14 d (range 0-180 d). Only 4/53 (7.5%) of the pilots contacted continued to fly powered parachutes. DISCUSSION: Powered parachute participants are at risk for unique injuries compared to other forms of flight. A powered parachute injury can have a significant impact on future pilot involvement in the sport. This study provides evidence for design changes in the aircraft and helps direct pilot training. This information can improve the safety and well-being of participants so they can continue to fly powered parachutes.

    3D Printed Orthopaedic External Fixation Devices: A Systematic Review

    No full text
    Abstract Background External fixators are complex, expensive orthopaedic devices used to stabilize high-energy and complex fractures of the extremities. Although the technology has advanced dramatically over the last several decades, the mechanical goals for fracture stabilization of these devices have remained unchanged. Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has the potential to advance the practice and access to external fixation devices in orthopaedics. This publication aims to systematically review and synthesize the current literature on 3D printed external fixation devices for managing orthopaedic trauma fractures. Methods The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocols were followed for this manuscript with minor exceptions. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Review, Google Scholar, and Scopus online databases were systematically searched. Two independent reviewers screened the search results based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria related to 3D printing and external fixation of fractures. Results Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. These included one mechanical testing study, two computational simulation studies, three feasibility studies, and three clinical case studies. Fixator designs and materials varied significantly between authors. Mechanical testing revealed similar strength to traditional metal external fixators. Across all clinical studies, five patients underwent definitive treatment with 3D printed external fixators. They all had satisfactory reduction and healing with no reported complications. Conclusions The current literature on this topic is heterogeneous, with highly variable external fixator designs and testing techniques. A small and limited number of studies in the scientific literature have analyzed the use of 3D printing in this area of orthopaedic surgery. 3D printed external fixation design advancements have yielded promising results in several small clinical case studies. However, additional studies on a larger scale with standardized testing and reporting techniques are needed

    “In-Round” Labral Repair After Acetabular Recession Using Intermittent Traction

    No full text
    The prevalence of hip arthroscopy has increased exponentially with the advent of arthroscopic labral repair techniques for femoroacetabular impingement. The goal of arthroscopic labral repair is to re-create the anatomic suction seal of the labrum against the femoral head. This important anatomic relationship has been demonstrated in several biomechanical studies. Performing the acetabular recession and evaluating the congruity of labral repairs during surgery is difficult with the application of traction distracting the femoral head from the chondrolabral junction. Additionally, prolonged traction risks nerve injury during hip arthroscopy. The purpose of this technique article is to describe a method of using traction only for central compartment work, and releasing the traction to allow the femoral head to reduce the labrum to its anatomic position for acetabular recession, anchor placement, and suture fixation. In this manner, the presented technique prevents an “out-of-round” or everted repair. This technique re-creates the native anatomy and biomechanics of the hip after acetabular recession and labral repair while decreasing traction time

    Proceedings from the 9th annual conference on the science of dissemination and implementation

    No full text
    corecore