Enumeration of extracellular vesicles by a new improved flow cytometric method is comparable to fluorescence mode nanoparticle tracking analysis

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play a role in a variety of physiological and pathological processes. However, use of EVs as biomarkers has been hampered by limitations of current detection and enumeration methods. We compared fluorescence-threshold flow cytometry (FT-FC) to nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) for enumeration of cell culture-derived EVs. FT-FC and NTA utilising fluorescence mode (F-NTA) enumerated similar numbers of EVs stained with a membrane dye PKH67. Both methods were sufficiently sensitive to detect cell-derived EVs above the background of culture medium. Light scatter NTA (LS-NTA) detected 10-100. × more particles than either fluorescence-based method but demonstrated poor specificity. F-NTA appeared to have better sensitivity for 100 nm range. Due to wider availability and higher degree of automation and standardisation, FT-FC is a reasonable surrogate to F-NTA for quantification of EVs

Analysis of neat biofluids obtained during cardiac surgery using nanoparticle tracking analysis: methodological considerations

Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are those nanovesicles 30–150 nm in size with a role in cell signalling and potential as biomarkers of disease. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) techniques are commonly used to measure sEV concentration in biofluids. However, this quantification technique can be susceptible to sample handing and machine settings. Moreover, some classes of lipoproteins are of similar sizes and could therefore confound sEV quantification, particularly in blood-derived preparations, such serum and plasma. Here we have provided methodological information on NTA measurements and systematically investigated potential factors that could interfere with the reliability and repeatability of results obtained when looking at neat biofluids (i.e., human serum and pericardial fluid) obtained from patients undergoing cardiac surgery and from healthy controls. Data suggest that variables that can affect vesicle quantification include the level of contamination from lipoproteins, number of sample freeze/thaw cycles, sample filtration, using saline-based diluents, video length and keeping the number of particles per frame within defined limits. Those parameters that are of less concern include focus, the “Maximum Jump” setting and the number of videos recorded. However, if these settings are clearly inappropriate the results obtained will be spurious. Similarly, good experimental practice suggests that multiple videos should be recorded. In conclusion, NTA is a perfectible, but still commonly used system for sEVs analyses. Provided users handle their samples with a highly robust and consistent protocol, and accurately report these aspects, they can obtain data that could potentially translate into new clinical biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring of cardiovascular disease

Nanoparticle tracking analysis of gold nanoparticles in aqueous media through an inter-laboratory comparison

In the field of nanotechnology, analytical characterization plays a vital role in understanding the behavior and toxicity of nanomaterials (NMs). Characterization needs to be thorough and the technique chosen should be well-suited to the property to be determined, the material being analyzed and the medium in which it is present. Furthermore, the instrument operation and methodology need to be well-developed and clearly understood by the user to avoid data collection errors. Any discrepancies in the applied method or procedure can lead to differences and poor reproducibility of obtained data. This paper aims to clarify the method to measure the hydrodynamic diameter of gold nanoparticles by means of Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA). This study was carried out as an inter-laboratory comparison (ILC) amongst seven different laboratories to validate the standard operating procedure’s performance and reproducibility. The results obtained from this ILC study reveal the importance and benefits of detailed standard operating procedures (SOPs), best practice updates, user knowledge, and measurement automation