The correlation between DPYD9A (c.85T > C) genotype and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency phenotype in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies treated with fluoropyrimidines: Updated analysis

544 Background: The correlation between DPYD*9A (c.85T > C) genotype and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency phenotype is controversial. In our cohort of 28 patients with gastrointestinal malignancies (GI) treated with fluoropyrimidines, DPYD*9A was the most commonly diagnosed variant (46%) and there was a noticeable genotype-phenotype correlation (Khushman et al). In this updated analysis, a larger cohort of a mixed racial background was genotyped for DPYD*9A variant to confirm the incidence and genotype-phenotype correlation. Methods: Between 2011 and 2018, in addition to genotyping for high risk DPYD variants (DPYD*2A, DPYD*13 and DPYD*9B), genotyping for DPYD*9A variant was performed on 113 patients. Fluoropyrimidines-associated toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v 5.0). Results: DPYD variants were identified in 61 patients. DPYD*2A was identified in 3 patients and DPYD*9B was identified in 2 patients (one patient had double heterozygous *9A and *9B). Heterozygous DPYD*9A was identified in 46 patients (41%) and homozygous DPYD*9A was identified in 11 patients (10%). Among patients with DPYD*9A variant, Caucasians represented 51% and African Americans represented 46%. 27 patients (47%) were females. Grade 3-4 toxicities were experienced in 26 patients with mutant DPYD*9A (3 patients had homozygous DPYD*9A) and in 20 patients with no identified DPYD mutation (P = 0.7035). In patients who received full dose fluoropyrimidines (N = 85), grade 3-4 toxicities were experienced in 22 patients with mutant DPYD*9A (2 patients had homozygous DPYD*9A) and in 17 patients with no identified DPYD mutation (P = 0.8275). Conclusions: In our updated analysis, DPYD*9A variant was the most commonly diagnosed variant. The correlation between DPYD*9A variant and DPD clinical phenotype was not reproduced. The noticeable correlation that we previously reported is likely due to small sample size and patients’ selection and testing bias

The Prevalence of DPYD9A(c.85T>C) Genotype and the Genotype-Phenotype Correlation in Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies Treated With Fluoropyrimidines: Updated Analysis

The dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD)*9A (c.85T>C) genotype is relatively common. The correlation between DPYD*9A genotype and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency phenotype is controversial. In a cohort of 28 patients, DPYD*9A was the most commonly diagnosed variant (13 patients [46%]) and there was a noticeable genotype-phenotype correlation. In this study we genotyped a larger cohort of a mixed racial background to explore the prevalence of DPYD*9A variant and to confirm the genotype-phenotype correlation. Between 2011 and 2018, in addition to genotyping for high-risk DPYD variants (DPYD*2A, DPYD*13 and DPYD*9B), genotyping for DPYD*9A variant was performed on 113 patients with gastrointestinal malignancies treated with fluoropyrimidines. Fluoropyrimidines-associated toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0). Fisher exact test was used for statistical analysis. Heterozygous and homozygous DPYD*9A genotypes were identified in 46 (41%) and 11 (10%) patients, respectively. Among patients with DPYD*9A genotypes (n = 57), men and women represented 30 (53%) and 27 (47%) patients, respectively. Caucasian, African American, and other ethnicities represented 29 (50.9%), 26 (45.6%), and 2 (3.5%) patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities were experienced in 26 patients with DPYD*9A genotype (3 patients had homozygous status) and in 20 patients with wild type DPYD*9A (P = .4405). In patients who received full-dose fluoropyrimidines (n = 85), Grade 3/4 toxicities were experienced in 22 patients with DPYD*9A genotype (2 patients had homozygous status), and in 17 patients with wild type DPYD (P = .8275). In our updated analysis, the prevalence of heterozygous and homozygous DPYD*9A genotypes were 41% and 10%, respectively. The correlation between DPYD*9A genotype and DPD clinical phenotype was not reproduced. The noticeable correlation that we previously reported is likely because of small sample size and selection bias. In our previous study of a cohort of 28 patients, DPYD∗9A (c.85T>C) was the most commonly diagnosed variant (46%) and there was a noticeable genotype-phenotype correlation. In this study we genotyped a larger cohort of a mixed racial background to explore the prevalence of DPYD∗9A variant and to confirm the genotype-phenotype correlation. In this updated analysis, the prevalence of heterozygous and homozygous DPYD∗9A genotypes were 41% and 10%, respectively; the correlation between DPYD∗9A genotype and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase clinical phenotype was not reproduced. The noticeable correlation that we previously reported is likely because of small sample size and selection bias

Germline pharmacogenomics of thymidylate synthase gene in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies treated with fluoropyrimidines-based chemotherapy regimens

545 Background: Fluoropyrimidines are antimetabolites that target the S phase of the cell cycle. The active metabolite, 5-fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate inhibits thymidylate synthase (TS) enzyme, thus preventing DNA synthesis and ultimately cell death. While controversy exists in the literature, polymorphism in the promoter region of thymidylate synthase gene (TYMS) that decrease TS expression has been associated with increased fluoropyrimidines-associated toxicities. This study explored the association between polymorphism in the promoter region of TYMS gene and fluoropyrimidines-associated toxicities in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies with mixed racial background. Methods: Between 2011 and 2018, 126 patients were genotyped for TYMS. Patients with known high-risk dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene variants were excluded. Fluoropyrimidines-associated toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institiute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v 5.0). Fisher’s exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results: TYMS genotypes that predict increased TS expression (3RG/3RG, 3RG/3RC, 2R/3RG, 2R/4R, 3R/4R, 4R/3RG) were identified in 55 patients (44%). TYMS genotypes that predict decreased TS expression (2R/2R, 2R/3RC, 3RC/3RC) were seen in 71 patients (56%). Among patients with genotypes that predict increased TS expression (N = 55), 12 patients had grade 3-4 toxicity (22%) while among patients with genotypes that predict decreased TS expression, 30 patients had grade 3-4 toxicities (42%) (P = 0.0219). Compared to patients with genotypes predicting increased TS expression, 17 out of 31 patients (55%) with 2R/2R TYMS genotype had grade 3-4 toxicity (P = 0.0039) and 15 out 40 patients (38%) with 2R/3RC and 3RC/3RC TYMS genotype had grade 3-4 toxicity (P = 0.1108). Among patients with 2R/2R TYMS, Caucasians represented 61% and African Americans represented 39%. Females represented 65% of the patients. Conclusions: Polymorphism in the promoter region of TYMS gene that predict decreased TS expression due to 2R/2R variant was associated with grade 3-4 fluoropyrimidines-associated toxicities

Health system gaps in cardiovascular disease prevention and management in Nepal

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of deaths and disability in Nepal. Health systems can improve CVD health outcomes even in resource-limited settings by directing efforts to meet critical system gaps. This study aimed to identify Nepal's health systems gaps to prevent and manage CVDs. METHODS: We formed a task force composed of the government and non-government representatives and assessed health system performance across six building blocks: governance, service delivery, human resources, medical products, information system, and financing in terms of equity, access, coverage, efficiency, quality, safety and sustainability. We reviewed 125 national health policies, plans, strategies, guidelines, reports and websites and conducted 52 key informant interviews. We grouped notes from desk review and transcripts' codes into equity, access, coverage, efficiency, quality, safety and sustainability of the health system. RESULTS: National health insurance covers less than 10% of the population; and more than 50% of the health spending is out of pocket. The efficiency of CVDs prevention and management programs in Nepal is affected by the shortage of human resources, weak monitoring and supervision, and inadequate engagement of stakeholders. There are policies and strategies in place to ensure quality of care, however their implementation and supervision is weak. The total budget on health has been increasing over the past five years. However, the funding on CVDs is negligible. CONCLUSION: Governments at the federal, provincial and local levels should prioritize CVDs care and partner with non-government organizations to improve preventive and curative CVDs services.</p

Reconvene and Reconnect the Antioxidant Hypothesis in Human Health and Disease

The antioxidants are essential molecules in human system but are not miracle molecules. They are neither performance enhancers nor can prevent or cure diseases when taken in excess. Their supplemental value is debateable. In fact, many high quality clinical trials on antioxidant supplement have shown no effect or adverse outcomes ranging from morbidity to all cause mortality. Several Chochrane Meta-analysis and Markov Model techniques, which are presently best available statistical models to derive conclusive answers for comparing large number of trials, support these claims. Nevertheless none of these statistical techniques are flawless. Hence, more efforts are needed to develop perfect statistical model to analyze the pooled data and further double blind, placebo controlled interventional clinical trials, which are gold standard, should be implicitly conducted to get explicit answers. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase and catalase are termed as primary antioxidants as these scavenge superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide. All these three enzymes are inducible enzymes, thereby inherently meaning that body increases or decreases their activity as per requirement. Hence there is no need to attempt to manipulate their activity nor have such efforts been clinically useful. SOD administration has been tried in some conditions especially in cancer and myocardial infarction but has largely failed, probably because SOD is a large molecule and can not cross cell membrane. The dietary antioxidants, including nutrient antioxidants are chain breaking antioxidants and in tandem with enzyme antioxidants temper the reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) within physiological limits. Since body is able to regulate its own requirements of enzyme antioxidants, the diet must provide adequate quantity of non-enzymic antioxidants to meet the normal requirements and provide protection in exigent condition. So far, there is no evidence that human tissues ever experience the torrent of reactive species and that in chronic conditions with mildly enhanced generation of reactive species, the body can meet them squarely if antioxidants defense system in tissues is biochemically optimized. We are not yet certain about optimal levels of antioxidants in tissues. Two ways have been used to assess them: first by dietary intake and second by measuring plasma levels. Lately determination of plasma/serum level of antioxidants is considered better index for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. The recommended levels for vitamin A, E and C and beta carotene are 2.2–2.8 μmol/l; 27.5–30 μmol/l; 40–50 μmol/l and 0.4–0.5 μmol/l, respectively. The requirement and recommended blood levels of other dietary antioxidants are not established. The resolved issues are (1) essential to scavenge excess of radical species (2) participants in redox homeostasis (3) selective antioxidants activity against radical species (4) there is no universal antioxidant and 5) therapeutic value in case of deficiency. The overarching issues are (1) therapeutic value as adjuvant therapy in management of diseases (2) supplemental value in developing population (3) selective interactivity of antioxidant in different tissues and on different substrates (4) quantitative contribution in redox balance (5) mechanisms of adverse action on excess supplementation (6) advantages and disadvantages of prooxidant behavior of antioxidants (7) behavior in cohorts with polymorphic differences (8) interaction and intervention in radiotherapy, diabetes and diabetic complications and cardiovascular diseases (9) preventive behavior in neurological disorders (10) benefits of non-nutrient dietary antioxidants (11) markers to assess optimized antioxidants status (12) assessment of benefits of supplementation in alcoholics and heavy smokers. The unresolved and intriguing issues are (1) many compounds such as vitamin A and many others possessing both antioxidant and non-antioxidant properties contribute to both the activities in vivo or exclusively only to non-antioxidant activity and (2) since human tissues do not experience the surge of FR, whether there is any need to develop stronger synthetic antioxidants. Theoretically such antioxidants may do more harm than good