Kinematic Comparison of Different Technique of Putting the Shot at the Moment of Release

The purpose of the study was to conduct a kinematic comparison of different techniques of putting the shot at the moment of Release. Eight male shot putters of L.N.U.P.E. between the age group of 20 to 26 years, who had been participating regularly, were selected as subjects. 2 D Kinovea Video Anlysis software was used for kinematical analysis of different techniques of putting the shot. Casio Exilim Ex F1H a standard camera which frequency was 300 frame/second and which was placed at 4.67 meter distance perpendicular to  the subject in horizontal plane at height of 1.50 meter.  To find out kinematical comparison between those shot putters who uses different stances t-test was used. For testing the hypothesis the level of significance was set at .05.Results show that the calculated t value is 1.237   and      .260   in relation to linear kinematical variables at moment of releases i.e. Height of c.g. of subject and height of c.g. of shot respectively. It also show that calculated t value for angular kinematic variables such as ankle (right & left),knee(right&left),hip(right&left),shoulder(right&left),elbow(right&left)andwristjoint(right&left)is(.454&2.83*),(1.39&.351),(2.23&1.51),(.290&.419),(.550&.794)and(.365&.833). 1)Insignificant difference was found between those shot putters who uses different technique of putting the shot in relation to  height of c.g. of subject and height of c.g. of shot put.2)Insignificant difference was also found in relation to ankle (right), knee (right & left) and hip joint (right), shoulder (right & left), elbow (right & left) and wrist joint (right & left).3)Significant difference was found between those shot putters who use different technique of putting the shot in relation to ankle joint (left). Key words: Horizontal Plane, Kinematic, Shot Put, Technique

Road to family planning and RMNCHN related SDGs: Tracing the role of public health spending in India

Globally, public health expenditure (PHE) is closely associated with Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child Health, and Nutrition (RMNCHN) and Family Planning (FP) outcomes. In India, the role of PHE in shaping the progress towards the attainment of RMNCHN and FP-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is not widely documented. Using the four consecutive rounds of National Family Health Survey (NFHS), we have investigated the progress in RMNCHN and FP indicators and their association with PHE by applying robust econometric modelling. The findings suggest that although there is noticeable progress in the RMNCHN indicators from 1992–93–2015–16, India has failed to achieve RMNCHN targets related to Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Lack of noteworthy correlation between FP indicators and PHE supports the argument that post National Rural Health Mission (2005), the core family welfare expenditure suffered a setback despite the absolute rise in PHE. However, correlation plots and the multivariate panel data regression analyses affirm that even with a moderate rise, PHE emerges as an important predictor of RMNCHN outcomes in the country. Thus, the road to achieving RMNCHN and FP-related SDGs demands to avoid austerity on PHE and strengthen the integration of RMNCHN and FP programmes at the operational level