Table_1,_Table_2_(1) – Care Planning: What Works, for Whom, and in What Circumstances? A Rapid Realist Review

<p>Supplemental material, Table_1,_Table_2_(1) for Care Planning: What Works, for Whom, and in What Circumstances? A Rapid Realist Review by Sarah Brown, Monique Lhussier, Sonia M. Dalkin and Simon Eaton in Qualitative Health Research</p

Supplemental_Material. – Supplemental material for Care Planning: What Works, for Whom, and in What Circumstances? A Rapid Realist Review

<p>Supplemental material, Supplemental_Material. for Care Planning: What Works, for Whom, and in What Circumstances? A Rapid Realist Review by Sarah Brown, Monique Lhussier, Sonia M. Dalkin and Simon Eaton in Qualitative Health Research</p

Figure_1_(10) – Supplemental material for Care Planning: What Works, for Whom, and in What Circumstances? A Rapid Realist Review

<p>Supplemental material, Figure_1_(10) for Care Planning: What Works, for Whom, and in What Circumstances? A Rapid Realist Review by Sarah Brown, Monique Lhussier, Sonia M. Dalkin and Simon Eaton in Qualitative Health Research</p

Spearman correlation coefficients between total energy expenditure (TEE) and physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) by doubly labeled water and physical activity by accelerometry and questionnaire.

<p>Spearman's rank coefficients (Rho) are based on kilocalories per day of Total Energy Expenditure (TEE) and Physical Activity Energy Expenditure (PAEE).</p

Physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) by doubly labeled water (kcal/day) and minutes per week spent on physical activity by questionnaire.

<p>The regression equation is PAEE  = 637+ (0.39 * minutes per week of physical activity), adjusted r² = 0.16, p-value for physical activity 0.03.</p

Total energy expenditure (TEE) by doubly labeled water (kcal/day) and accelerometry-based physical activity (counts).

<p>The regression equation is TEE  = 1221+ (0.0033 * counts), adjusted r² = 0.31, p-value for accelerometry-based physical activity 0.002.</p

Physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) by doubly labeled water (kcal/day) and accelerometry-based physical activity (counts).

<p>The regression equation is PAEE  = −286+ (0.0027 * counts), adjusted r² = 0.34, p-value for MVPA 0.002.</p

Description of the sample in terms of body composition, energy expenditure and physical activity.

<p>Values are means +/− standard deviations (SD).</p

Quantification of extracellular matrix components in samples stored with the SCM protocol.

<p>Quantification of extracellular matrix components in samples stored with the SCM protocol.</p

Functional analysis of decellularised scaffolds.

<p>(A,B) Synchrotron analysis after 2 DET cycles confirmed extracellular matrix preservation in the lamina propria, submucosa and muscularis. (C) An intact basement membrane was detected across the entire scaffold segment. (D) Blood vessels were seen converging towards the scaffold in a spoked wheel manner after 10 days from placement on the CAM as confirmed by blinded quantification of the vessels compared to the negative control (**p< 0.01). (E) The maximum tensile stress at which the samples broke and the elasticity modulus remained comparable to fresh after decellularisation. (F) Characteristic stress-strain curves showing that by increasing the number of DET cycles the tensile stress at which the samples break remains the same as seen in E. DET = Detergent-Enzymatic Treatment, CAM = Chicken chorioallantoic membrane assay.</p