Erratum to: High rates of clinically relevant incidental findings by total-body CT scanning in trauma patients: Results of the REACT-2 trial

A technical error led to incorrect rendering of the author group in this article. The correct authorship is as follows: K. Treskes1, S.A. Bos1, L.F.M. Beenen2, J.C. Sierink1, M.J.R. Edwards3, B.J

Emergency Bleeding Control Interventions After Immediate Total-Body CT Scans in Trauma Patients

Background: Immediate total-body CT (iTBCT) is often used for screening of potential severely injured patients. Patients requiring emergency bleeding control interventions benefit from fast and optimal trauma screening. The aim of this study was to assess whether an initial trauma assessment with iTBCT is associated with lower mortality in patients requiring emergency bleeding control interventions. Methods: In the REACT-2 trial, patients who sustained major trauma were randomized for iTBCT or for conventional imaging and selective CT scanning (standard workup; STWU) in five trauma centers. Patients who underwent emergency bleeding control interventions following their initial trauma assessment with iTBCT were compared for mortality and clinically relevant time intervals to patients that underwent the initial trauma assessment with the STWU. Results: In the REACT-2 trial, 1083 patients were enrolled of which 172

Total-body CT scanning in trauma patients: Benefits and boundaries

Computed tomography (CT) scanning has become essential in the early diagnostic phase of trauma care. It is a fast and highly accurate modality for the identification of various injuries and it enables a rapid response to life-threatening problems. Especially total-body CT (TBCT) scanning is increasingly used. The TBCT scan can be used as a supplement to conventional imaging (i.e. chest and pelvic x-rays, FAST and selective CT scanning), but also as a total replacement. The aim of this thesis was to clarify the role of (immediate) TBCT scanning in severely injured patients, considering its benefits and boundaries

[Direct total body CT scan in multi-trauma patients]

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: Immediate total body computed tomography (CT) scanning has become important in the early diagnostic phase of trauma care because of its high diagnostic accuracy. However, literature provides limited evidence whether immediate total body CT leads to better clinical outcome then conventional radiographic imaging supplemented with selective CT scanning in trauma patients. The aim of the REACT-2 trial is to determine the value of immediate total body CT scanning in trauma patients. DESIGN: The REACT-2 trial is an international, multicenter randomized clinical trial. METHODS: All participating trauma centers have a multi-slice CT scanner located in the trauma room or at the Emergency Department (ED). All adult, non-pregnant, severely injured trauma patients according to predefined criteria will be included. The intervention group will receive a contrast-enhanced total body CT scan (head to pelvis) during the primary survey. The control group will be evaluated according to local conventional trauma imaging protocols (based on ATLS guidelines) supplemented with selective CT scanning. Primary outcome will be in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes are differences in mortality and morbidity during the first year post trauma, several trauma work-up time intervals, radiation exposure, general health and quality of life at 6 and 12 months post trauma and cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: The REACT-2 trial is the first multicenter randomized clinical trial that will provide evidence on the value of immediate total body CT scanning during the primary survey of severely injured trauma patients

Propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcome between stent as bridge to surgery and emergency resection in patients with malignant left-sided colonic obstruction

Background: Although self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement as bridge to surgery (BTS) in patients with left-sided obstructing colonic cancer has shown promising short-term results, it is used infrequently owing to uncertainty about its oncological safety. This population study compared long-term oncological outcomes between emergency resection and SEMS placement as BTS.Methods: Through a national collaborative research project, long-term outcome data were collected for all patients who underwent resection for left-sided obstructing colonic cancer between 2009 and 2016 in 75 Dutch hospitals. Patients were identified from the Dutch Colorectal Audit database. SEMS as BTS was compared with emergency resection in the curative setting after 1: 2 propensity score matching.Results: Some 222 patients who had a stent placed were matched to 444 who underwent emergency resection. The overall SEMS-related perforation rate was 7.7 per cent (17 of 222). Three-year locoregional recurrence rates after SEMS insertion and emergency resection were 11-4 and 13.6 per cent (P= 0-457), disease-free survival rates were 58-8 and 52.6 per cent (P= 0-175), and overall survival rates were 74-0 and 68-3 per cent (P= 0.231), respectively. SEMS placement resulted in significantly fewer permanent stomas (23.9 versus 45.3 per cent; P < 0-001), especially in elderly patients (29.0 versus 57.9 per cent; P < 0-001). For patients in the SEMS group with or without perforation, 3-year locoregional recurrence rates were 18 and 11.0 per cent (P= 0.432), disease-free survival rates were 49 and 59.6 per cent (P= 0-717), and overall survival rates 61 and 75.1 per cent (P= 0.529), respectively.Conclusion: Overall, SEMS as BTS seems an oncologically safe alternative to emergency resection with fewer permanent stomas. Nevertheless, the risk of SEMS-related perforation, as well as permanent stoma, might influence shared decision-making for individual patients.Research into fetal development and medicin