Prediction and control of patterned activity in small neural networks

Rhythmic neural activity is thought to underlie many high-level functions of the nervous system. Our goals are to understand rhythmic activity starting with small networks, using theoretical and experimental tools. Phase resetting theory describes essential properties that cause and destroy rhythms. We validate and extend one branch of this theory, testing it in bursting neurons coupled by excitation and then extending the theory to account for temporal variability found in our experimental data. We show that the theory makes good predictions of rhythmic activity in heterogeneous networks. We also note differences in mathematical structure between inhibition- and excitation-coupling that cause them to behave differently in noisy contexts and may explain why all central pattern generators (CPGs) found in nature are dominated by inhibition. Our extension of the theory gives a method that is useful to compare experimental and model data and shows that noise may either create or destroy a rhythm. Finally, we described the cellular mechanisms in Aplysia that switch the feeding CPG from arrhythmic to rhythmic behavior in response to reward stimuli. Previous studies showed that a Dopamine reward signal is correlated to changes in electrical coupling and excitability in several important neurons in the CPG. Using the dynamic clamp and an in vitro analog of the full behavioral system, we were able to determine that electrical coupling alone controls rhythmicity, while excitability independently controls the rate of activity. These results beg for further study, including new theory to explain them fully.Ph.D.Committee Chair: Prinz, Astrid; Committee Co-Chair: Butera, Robert; Committee Member: Calabrese, Ronald; Committee Member: Canavier, Carmen; Committee Member: DeWeerth, Steve

Predictions of Phase-Locking in Excitatory Hybrid Networks: Excitation Does Not Promote Phase-Locking in Pattern-Generating Networks as Reliably as Inhibition

Phase-locked activity is thought to underlie many high-level functions of the nervous system, the simplest of which are produced by central pattern generators (CPGs). It is not known whether we can define a theoretical framework that is sufficiently general to predict phase-locking in actual biological CPGs, nor is it known why the CPGs that have been characterized are dominated by inhibition. Previously, we applied a method based on phase response curves measured using inputs of biologically realistic amplitude and duration to predict the existence and stability of 1:1 phase-locked modes in hybrid networks of one biological and one model bursting neuron reciprocally connected with artificial inhibitory synapses. Here we extend this analysis to excitatory coupling. Using the pyloric dilator neuron from the stomatogastric ganglion of the American lobster as our biological cell, we experimentally prepared 86 networks using five biological neurons, four model neurons, and heterogeneous synapse strengths between 1 and 10,000 nS. In 77% of networks, our method was robust to biological noise and accurately predicted the phasic relationships. In 3%, our method was inaccurate. The remaining 20% were not amenable to analysis because our theoretical assumptions were violated. The high failure rate for excitation compared with inhibition was due to differential effects of noise and feedback on excitatory versus inhibitory coupling and suggests that CPGs dominated by excitatory synapses would require precise tuning to function, which may explain why CPGs rely primarily on inhibitory synapses

Differential Roles of Nonsynaptic and Synaptic Plasticity in Operant Reward Learning-Induced Compulsive Behavior

SummaryBackgroundRewarding stimuli in associative learning can transform the irregularly and infrequently generated motor patterns underlying motivated behaviors into output for accelerated and stereotyped repetitive action. This transition to compulsive behavioral expression is associated with modified synaptic and membrane properties of central neurons, but establishing the causal relationships between cellular plasticity and motor adaptation has remained a challenge.ResultsWe found previously that changes in the intrinsic excitability and electrical synapses of identified neurons in Aplysia’s central pattern-generating network for feeding are correlated with a switch to compulsive-like motor output expression induced by in vivo operant conditioning. Here, we used specific computer-simulated ionic currents in vitro to selectively replicate or suppress the membrane and synaptic plasticity resulting from this learning. In naive in vitro preparations, such experimental manipulation of neuronal membrane properties alone increased the frequency but not the regularity of feeding motor output found in preparations from operantly trained animals. On the other hand, changes in synaptic strength alone switched the regularity but not the frequency of feeding output from naive to trained states. However, simultaneously imposed changes in both membrane and synaptic properties reproduced both major aspects of the motor plasticity. Conversely, in preparations from trained animals, experimental suppression of the membrane and synaptic plasticity abolished the increase in frequency and regularity of the learned motor output expression.ConclusionsThese data establish direct causality for the contributions of distinct synaptic and nonsynaptic adaptive processes to complementary facets of a compulsive behavior resulting from operant reward learning