27 research outputs found

    Acid inhibitors and allergy: comorbidity, causation and confusion

    No full text

    Acid inhibitors and allergy: comorbidity, causation and confusion

    No full text
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS11

    Melatonin for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome

    No full text

    Post-COVID-19 functional gastrointestinal disorders: Prepare for a GI aftershock

    No full text
    10.1111/jgh.15776JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY373413-41

    Adults living with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): a qualitative systematic review

    No full text
    Objective: To consolidate existing qualitative studies which examined the experiences and needs of adults living with IBS, and to gather a holistic insight for future directions and avenues to support these adults. Methods: A qualitative systematic review was conducted and six databases were searched for qualitative studies, beginning from each database's inception to July 2020. The qualitative data were meta-synthesised and thematic analysis was adopted. Any discrepancies that arose were discussed between the reviewers until a consensus was reached throughout the process of data screening, selection, critical appraisal and synthesis. Results: Seventeen studies with a total of 299 adults diagnosed with IBS were included. Four themes were identified: (1) physical, psychological, and social consequences; (2) impact of IBS on working adults; (3) dealing with IBS; and (4) sources of support and support needs. Conclusion: Future research across geographically diverse locations are needed to gather a thorough perspective of the experiences and needs of adults living with IBS. The development and evaluation of technology-based, trained peer-led volunteers, and interventions that adopt mindfulness, active coping strategies, cognitive behavioural therapy and acceptance, and commitment therapy are needed. Ultimately, the collaboration between the relevant stakeholders is essential for standardised instruments and materials for accurate testing, diagnosis, assessment, treatment and management of IBS

    Endoscopy training in COVID-19: Challenges and hope for a better age

    No full text
    10.1111/jgh.15524JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY36102715-271

    A low-cost endoscopy trainer for novice endoscopy training in COVID-19

    No full text
    10.1055/a-1230-3325ENDOSCOPY5212E463-E46

    One size fits all? Challenges faced by physicians during shift handovers in a hospital with high sender/recipient ratio

    No full text
    INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to investigate the challenges faced by physicians during shift handovers in a university hospital that has a high handover sender/recipient ratio. METHODS: We adopted a multifaceted approach, comprising recording and analysis of handover information, rating of handover quality, and shadowing of handover recipients. Data was collected at the general medical ward of a university hospital in Singapore for a period of three months. Handover information transfer (i.e. senders’ and recipients’ verbal communication, and recipients’ handwritten notes) and handover environmental factors were analysed. The relationship between ‘to-do’ tasks and information transfer, handover quality and handover duration was examined using analysis of variance. RESULTS: Verbal handovers for 152 patients were observed. Handwritten notes on 102 (67.1%) patients and handover quality ratings for 98 (64.5%) patients were collected. Although there was good task prioritisation (information transfer: p < 0.005, handover duration: p < 0.01), incomplete information transfer and poor implementation of non-modifiable identifiers were observed. The high sender/recipient ratio of the hospital made face-to-face and/or bedside handover difficult to implement. Although the current handover method (i.e. use of telephone communication) allowed for interactive communication, it resulted in systemic information loss due to the lack of written information. The handover environment was chaotic in the high sender/recipient ratio setting, and the physicians had no designated handover time or location. CONCLUSION: Handovers in high sender/recipient ratio settings are challenging. Efforts should be made to improve the handover processes in such situations, so that patient care is not compromised.Published versio
    corecore