19 research outputs found
Case report: a case of intractable Meniere's disease treated with autogenic training
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Psychological stress plays an important role in the onset and course of Meniere's disease. Surgical therapy and intratympanic gentamicin treatment are options for cases that are intractable to conventional medical therapy. Psychotherapy, however, including autogenic training (AT), which can be used for general relaxation, is not widely accepted. This paper describes the successful administration of AT in a subject suffering from intractable Meniere's disease.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>A 51-year-old male patient has suffered from fluctuating right sensorineural hearing loss with vertigo since 1994. In May 2002, he was first admitted to our hospital due to a severe vertigo attack accompanied by right sensorineural hearing loss. Spontaneous nystagmus toward the right side was observed. Since April 2004, he has experienced vertigo spells with right-sided tinnitus a few times per month that are intractable to conventional medical therapy. After four months, tympanic tube insertion was preformed in the right tympanic membrane. Intratympanic injection of dexamethasone was ineffective. He refused Meniett therapy and intratympanic gentamicin injection. In addition to his vertigo spells, he suffered from insomnia, tinnitus, and anxiety. Tranquilizers such as benzodiazepines and antidepressants such as serotonin selective re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) failed to stop the vertigo and only slightly improved his insomnia. In December 2006, the patient began psychological counseling with a psychotherapist. After brief psychological counseling along with cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), he began AT. He diligently and regularly continued his AT training in his home according to a written timetable. His insomnia, tinnitus, and vertigo spells disappeared within a few weeks after only four psychotherapy sessions. In order to master the six standard formulas of AT, he underwent two more sessions. Thereafter, he underwent follow-up for 9 months with no additional treatment. He is now free from drugs, including tranquilizers, and has continued AT. No additional treatment was performed. When we examined him <b>six </b>and nine months later for follow-up, he was free of vertigo and insomnia.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>AT together with CBT can be a viable and palatable treatment option for Meniere's disease patients who are not responsive to other therapies.</p
What is important in transdisciplinary pain neuroscience education? : A qualitative study
Purpose: The main focus of Pain Neuroscience Education is around changing patients’ pain perceptions and minimizing further medical care. Even though Pain Neuroscience Education has been studied extensively, the experiences of patients regarding the Pain Neuroscience Education process remain to be explored. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the experiences in patients with non-specific chronic pain. Materials and methods: Fifteen patients with non-specific chronic pain from a transdisciplinary treatment centre were in-depth interviewed. Data collection and analysis were performed according to Grounded Theory. Results: Five interacting topics emerged: (1) “the pre-Pain Neuroscience Education phase”, involving the primary needs to provide Pain Neuroscience Education, with subthemes containing (a) “a broad intake” and (b) “the healthcare professionals”; (2) “a comprehensible Pain Neuroscience Education” containing (a) “understandable explanation” and (b) “interaction between the physiotherapist and psychologist”; (3) “outcomes of Pain Neuroscience Education” including (a) “awareness”, b) “finding peace of mind”, and (c) “fewer symptoms”; 4) “"scepticism” containing (a) “doubt towards the diagnosis and Pain Neuroscience Education”, (b) “disagreement with the diagnosis and Pain Neuroscience Education”, and (c) “Pain Neuroscience Education can be confronting”. Conclusion: This is the first study providing insight into the constructs contributing to the Pain Neuroscience Education experience of patients with non-specific chronic pain. The results reveal the importance of the therapeutic alliance between the patient and caregiver, taking time, listening, providing a clear explanation, and the possible outcomes when doing so. The findings from this study can be used to facilitate healthcare professionals in providing Pain Neuroscience Education to patients with non-specific chronic pain. Implications for RehabilitationAn extensive biopsychosocial patient centred intake is crucial prior to providing Pain Neuroscience Education.Repetitions of Pain Neuroscience Education, in different forms (verbal and written information, examples, drawings, etc.) help patients to understand the theory of neurophysiology.Pain Neuroscience Education induces insight into the patient’s complaints, improved coping with complaints, improved self-control, and induces in some cases peace of mind.Healthcare professionals providing Pain Neuroscience Education should be aware of the possible confronting nature of the contributing factors