When Northern California Community Choice Aggregation Programs (CCAs) took over the role of sourcing electricity from the incumbent utility (Pacific Gas and Electric, or PG&E), they also made changes to how solar customers were treated. In the Humboldt, Sonoma, Marin, and San Mateo County regions, solar customers that were net exporters of electricity received an additional 0.01/kWhcreditonthegenerationportionoftheirbill.ThispolicyisinheritedfromoneCCAtoanother,and,giventheCCAsareprojectedtoserve18millionCaliforniansby2020(CalCCA,2018),understandingitsimpact−onasolarcustomer2˘7sbottomlineandonthelocalsolarmarket−iscriticalforthefutureofthevibrantCaliforniasolarindustry.WhenahypotheticalNorthernCaliforniaresidentialcustomerwithtypicalelectricityconsumptioninstallsasystemthatoffsets10013/year in additional value (in the form of end-of-year bill credits) relative to a bundled PG&E customer. When that annual load offset is raised to 110%, the Humboldt County approach provides an additional estimated $32/year. An analysis of the number residential solar installations before and after a CCA\u27s implementation could not isolate them as a factor that grew the local solar market; average monthly installs rose, but that increase was strongly correlated with broader trends, including falling costs. Interviews with solar contractors revealed that, while viewed as a positive gesture, this policy has not been proven to move the financial needle for potential customers