Iowa Agriculturist 65.04

Real Guys - All-Ag Banquet 6 Iowa State - Home of Top-Flight Students 8 Let\u27s Go Fishin\u27 10 New Secretary of Agriculture 12 Campus March of Agriculture 13https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/iowaagriculturist/1025/thumbnail.jp

Iowa Agriculturist 65.03

Ag 450 Trains Tomorrow\u27s Farmers 6 Showmanship Reigns Supreme 8 Job Hunting 10 Test Your Wit 12 March of Agriculture 13https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/iowaagriculturist/1032/thumbnail.jp

The Opinion - Vol. 08, No. 06

Originally published in print for Fuller Theological Seminary\u27s community from 1962 through 1977.https://digitalcommons.fuller.edu/fts-opinion/1121/thumbnail.jp

The Opinion - Vol. 09, No. 01

Originally published in print for Fuller Theological Seminary\u27s community from 1962 through 1977.https://digitalcommons.fuller.edu/fts-opinion/1122/thumbnail.jp

The Opinion - Vol. 08, No. 05

Originally published in print for Fuller Theological Seminary\u27s community from 1962 through 1977.https://digitalcommons.fuller.edu/fts-opinion/1120/thumbnail.jp

Report on the ISIKLE Project: Increasing and Evaluating Student Impact in Knowledge and Learning Exchange (ISIKLE)

This final report on the ISIKLE project which summarises the findings of the mixed-method evaluation of the work of ISIKLE over the two years from June 2020. The project was by funded by Research England and OfS to demonstrate and evaluate effective practices in student engagement in Knowledge Exchange activities to assess their economic and social benefits to individual students and to external partners and communities. The evaluation includes a Systematic Review of the literature on student knowledge exchange; narrative case studies of the innovations introduced on the ISIKLE sub-projects at UCL and University of Manchester; and both quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the impacts of the programmes on students and external partner

US National Climate Assessment (NCA) Scenarios for Assessing Our Climate Future: Issues and Methodological Perspectives Background Whitepaper for Participants

This whitepaper is intended to provide a starting point for discussion at a workshop for the National Climate Assessment (NCA) that focuses on the use and development of scenarios. The paper will provide background needed by participants in the workshop in order to review options for developing and using scenarios in NCA. The paper briefly defines key terms and establishes a conceptual framework for developing consistent scenarios across different end uses and spatial scales. It reviews uses of scenarios in past U.S. national assessments and identifies potential users of and needs for scenarios for both the report scheduled for release in June 2013 and to support an ongoing distributed assessment process in sectors and regions around the country. Because scenarios prepared for the NCA will need to leverage existing research, the paper takes account of recent scientific advances and activities that could provide needed inputs. Finally, it considers potential approaches for providing methods, data, and other tools for assessment participants. We note that the term 'scenarios' has many meanings. An important goal of the whitepaper (and portions of the workshop agenda) is pedagogical (i.e., to compare different meanings and uses of the term and make assessment participants aware of the need to be explicit about types and uses of scenarios). In climate change research, scenarios have been used to establish bounds for future climate conditions and resulting effects on human and natural systems, given a defined level of greenhouse gas emissions. This quasi-predictive use contrasts with the way decision analysts typically use scenarios (i.e., to consider how robust alternative decisions or strategies may be to variation in key aspects of the future that are uncertain). As will be discussed, in climate change research and assessment, scenarios describe a range of aspects of the future, including major driving forces (both human activities and natural processes), changes in climate and related environmental conditions (e.g., sea level), and evolution of societal capability to respond to climate change. This wide range of scenarios is needed because the implications of climate change for the environment and society depend not only on changes in climate themselves, but also on human responses. This degree of breadth introduces and number of challenges for communication and research

Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome

The sequence of the human genome encodes the genetic instructions for human physiology, as well as rich information about human evolution. In 2001, the International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium reported a draft sequence of the euchromatic portion of the human genome. Since then, the international collaboration has worked to convert this draft into a genome sequence with high accuracy and nearly complete coverage. Here, we report the result of this finishing process. The current genome sequence (Build 35) contains 2.85 billion nucleotides interrupted by only 341 gaps. It covers ∼99% of the euchromatic genome and is accurate to an error rate of ∼1 event per 100,000 bases. Many of the remaining euchromatic gaps are associated with segmental duplications and will require focused work with new methods. The near-complete sequence, the first for a vertebrate, greatly improves the precision of biological analyses of the human genome including studies of gene number, birth and death. Notably, the human enome seems to encode only 20,000-25,000 protein-coding genes. The genome sequence reported here should serve as a firm foundation for biomedical research in the decades ahead