Distribution and prevalence of Wolbachia infections in native populations of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera : Formicidae)

Wolbachia are endosymbiotic bacteria that commonly infect arthropods. These bacteria induce a number of phenotypes in their hosts, including cytoplasmic incompatibility, thelytokous parthenogenesis, feminization, and male killing. We surveyed native South American populations of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta Buren for Wolbachia infections by using a diagnostic polymerase chain reaction assay. In addition, we determined the fidelity of vertical transmission of the bacteria from mother to offspring in this species by assaying daughters in 24 simple-family (monogyne) colonies. Infections were common in many parts of the extensive native range of S. invicta. However, the proportion of individuals infected varied greatly among samples, ranging from zero in several populations from the northerly parts of the range to >90% in more southerly populations. Possible explanations for this variation in the prevalence of Wolbachia infections are discussed. A survey of the two social forms of S. invicta from four geographic areas showed that the prevalence of Wolbachia infections consistently was higher in the monogyne form (single queen per colony) than the sympatric polygyne form (multiple queens per colony). One likely explanation for this trend is that the selective regimes acting on Wolbachia in the two forms differ because of the dissimilar reproductive strategies used by each form. Finally, overall transmission efficiency was found to be very high (>99%), making it unlikely that imperfect transmission prevents the spread of the microbe to near fixation in native populations

Lesbian and bisexual women's human rights, sexual rights and sexual citizenship: negotiating sexual health in England.

Lesbian and bisexual women's sexual health is neglected in much Government policy and practice in England and Wales. This paper examines lesbian and bisexual women's negotiation of sexual health, drawing on findings from a small research project. Themes explored include invisibility and lack of information, influences on decision-making and sexual activities and experiences of services and barriers to sexual healthcare. Key issues of importance in this respect are homophobic and heterosexist social contexts. Drawing on understandings of lesbian, gay and bisexual human rights, sexual rights and sexual citizenship, it is argued that these are useful lenses through which to examine and address lesbian and bisexual women's sexual health and related inequalities

Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: a content analysis of published papers.

BACKGROUND: There is continuing interest among practitioners, policymakers and researchers in the evaluation of complex interventions stemming from the need to further develop the evidence base on the effectiveness of healthcare and public health interventions, and an awareness that evaluation becomes more challenging if interventions are complex.We undertook an analysis of published journal articles in order to identify aspects of complexity described by writers, the fields in which complex interventions are being evaluated and the challenges experienced in design, implementation and evaluation. This paper outlines the findings of this documentary analysis. METHODS: The PubMed electronic database was searched for the ten year period, January 2002 to December 2011, using the term "complex intervention*" in the title and/or abstract of a paper. We extracted text from papers to a table and carried out a thematic analysis to identify authors' descriptions of challenges faced in developing, implementing and evaluating complex interventions. RESULTS: The search resulted in a sample of 221 papers of which full text of 216 was obtained and 207 were included in the analysis. The 207 papers broadly cover clinical, public health and methodological topics. Challenges described included the content and standardisation of interventions, the impact of the people involved (staff and patients), the organisational context of implementation, the development of outcome measures, and evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of these papers suggests that more detailed reporting of information on outcomes, context and intervention is required for complex interventions. Future revisions to reporting guidelines for both primary and secondary research may need to take aspects of complexity into account to enhance their value to both researchers and users of research