Defining Satisfactory Methods of Treatment in Rare Diseases When Evaluating Significant Benefit-The EU Regulator's Perspective

Since the implementation of the EU Orphan Regulation in 2000, the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products at the European Medicines Agency has been evaluating the benefits of proposed orphan medicines vs. satisfactory treatment methods. This type of evaluation is foreseen in the Orphan Regulation as the orphan designation criterion called the "significant benefit." In this article, based on 20 years of experience, we provide a commentary explaining what is considered a satisfactory method of treatment in the context of the EU Orphan Regulation and for the purpose of the assessment of significant benefit. We discuss the challenges posed by continuously changing clinical practise, which is associated with the increasing number of treatment options, evolving nature of medicinal therapeutic indications and our understanding of them

Defining orphan conditions in the context of the European orphan regulation: challenges and evolution

The definition and acceptability of an orphan condition is pivotal for the assessment of European orphan medicinal product designation applications, and consequently the eligibility for incentives. Here, based on the experiences of the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products, we discuss how to define orphan conditions in the context of the European regulatory framework