34 research outputs found
ΠΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ: ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Ρ Π² Β«Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉΒ» ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅?
The article analyses the economic aspects of the application of antitrust legislation in the context of abuse of dominant position prohibition (primarily in the form of setting excessive prices) in industries that are characterized by a complexity of services both on the production side and on the demand side. Evidence from several recent antitrust cases against mobile network operators in Russia has shown that the analysis of prices for individual mobile services is incorrect outside the context of complex pricing under high joint fixed costs. The aim of this article is to explain the economic basis for changing the tariffs of telecommunication services in terms of antitrust legislation requirements. The article presents a direction for assessing the state of competition and the corresponding behavior of market participants (for example, attributes of determining excessive prices) taking into account the characteristics of the telecommunications industry, specially, the mobile services industry. Moreover, it is shown that mobile services exhibit the effects of active competition: a high quality of communication, high rates of innovative activity in the industry as a whole, as well as low prices.Π‘ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Ρ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½ΠΎΡΠΌ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π° Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Π½Π° Π·Π»ΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ (Π² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ Π² ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ) Π² ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠ»ΡΡ
Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π° ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π°, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ°. ΠΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π½Π΅Π΄Π°Π²Π½ΠΈΡ
Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π΄Π΅Π» ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Π² Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΡΠ΅Π½ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Π²Π½Π΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ·Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΅ΠΊ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΡΠΌ. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ β ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ Π·ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π°. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ Π½Π΅ΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΠ° (Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ² ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ) Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠ»ΠΈ, Π° ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ β ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π² ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡ, Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π»Ρ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ: Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ, Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΡ ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π² ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ
Problems of the Economic Efficiency of Foreign Trade in the Socialist Countries
The achievement of the Party Program requires the most expedient use of the material and labor resources. The 22nd Party Congress established as the objective of the economic agencies to achieve the utmost results in economic undertakings with the least expenditures, i.e., to increase their efficiency to the maximum.
Monogoroda: novyj vzgljad na staruju problemu
The authors of this paper propose an approach to studying risk management in the most vulnerable monotowns that would account for the relations between major stakeholders and use the tools developed in the framework of the new institutional economic theory. Having compared the existing definitions of the βmonotownβ concept, the authors present their own approach. They identify key reasons behind monotown vulnerability and systematize stakeholdersβ risks. The authors then posit that a study of monotown- related issues would be incomplete without accounting for stakeholdersβ interests and relations. Monotown problems become apparent in the context of institutional agreements carried out with high transition costs and increased risks of opportunistic behaviour encountered by the institutional agreement stakeholders. Solving these problems through the methods proposed in the article would help to identify a wider range of alternatives while still taking into account all the typical scenarios. The authors analyse the process of risk management in monotowns from the viewpoint of international practices; and identify structural alternatives of outweighing these risks by considering key relations affecting the implementation of each alternative