The Impact of a 22-Month Multistep Implementation Program on Speaking-Up Behavior in an Academic Anesthesia Department.

BACKGROUND Speaking-up is a method of assertive communication that increases patient safety but often encounters barriers. Numerous studies describe programs introducing speaking-up with varying success; the common denominator seems to be the need for a multimodal and sustained approach to achieve the required change in behavior and culture for safer health care. METHODS Before implementing a 22-month multistep program for establishing and strengthening speaking-up at our institution, we assessed perceived safety culture using the "Safety Attitudes Questionnaire." After program completion, participants completed parts of the same Safety Attitudes Questionnaire relevant to speaking-up, and preresult and postresult were compared. In addition, levels of speaking-up and assertive communication were compared with a Swiss benchmark using results from the "Speaking-up About Patient Safety Questionnaire." RESULTS Safety Attitudes Questionnaire scores were significantly higher after program completion in 2 of 3 answered questions (median [first quartile, third quartile), 5.0 [4.0, 5.0] versus 4.0 [4.0, 5.0], P = 0.0002, and 5.0 [4.0, 5.0] versus 4.0 [4.0, 4.0] P = 0.002; n = 34). Our composite score on the Speaking-up About Patient Safety Questionnaire was significantly higher (mean ± SD, 5.9 ± 0.7 versus 5.2 ± 1.0;P < 0.001) than the benchmark (n = 65). CONCLUSIONS A long-term multimodal program for speaking-up was successfully implemented. Attitude and climate toward safety generally improved, and postprogram perceived levels of assertive communication and speaking-up were higher than the benchmark. These results support current opinion that multimodal programs and continued effort are required, but that speaking-up can indeed be strengthened

Intraoperative pain during caesarean delivery: Incidence, risk factors and physician perception

Background: Intraoperative pain is a possible complication of neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean delivery. There is little information available about its incidence, risk factors and physician perception. Methods: Parturients undergoing spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean delivery were enrolled. Before surgery, parturients were asked about preoperative anxiety on a verbal numerical scale (VNS), anticipated analgesic requirement, postoperative pain levels, Spielberger STATE-TRAIT inventory index, Pain Catastrophizing Scale. After surgery, parturients were asked to answer questions (intraoperative VNS pain). The anaesthesiologist and obstetrician were asked to fill out a questionnaire asking about perceived intraoperative pain. Influence of preoperative anxiety on intraoperative pain (yes/no) was assessed using logistic regression. Mc Fadden's R2 was calculated. The agreement in physician perception of intraoperative pain with reported pain by the parturient was examined by calculating Cohen's kappa and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). Results: We included 193 parturients in our analysis. Incidence of intraoperative pain was 11.9%. Median intraoperative VNS pain of parturients with pain was 4.0 (1st quartile 4.0; 3rd quartile 9.0). Preoperative anxiety was not a good predictor of intraoperative pain (p-value of β-coefficient = 0.43, Mc Fadden's R2 = 0.01). Including further preoperative variables did not result in a good prediction model. Cohen's kappa between reported pain by parturient and by the obstetrician was 0.21 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.41) and by the anaesthesiologist was 0.3 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.48). Conclusions: We found a substantial incidence (11.9%) of intraoperative pain during caesarean delivery. Preoperative anxiety did not predict intraoperative pain. Physicians did not accurately identify parturients' intraoperative pain. Significance: Intraoperative pain occurred in 11.9% and severe intraoperative pain occurred in 1.11% of parturients undergoing elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia. We did not find any preoperative variables that could reliably predict intraoperative pain. Obstetricians and anaesthesiologists underestimated the incidence of intraoperative pain in our cohort and thus, more attention must be put to parturients' pain

An explorative analysis of pharmacovigilance data of oxytocin and its analogue carbetocin, with a focus on haemodynamic adverse effects

Background Oxytocin and its analogue carbetocin are uterotonics whose prophylactic use is recommended to prevent postpartum haemorrhage, which is one of the leading causes of maternal deaths worldwide. However, both drugs can cause specific adverse effects and haemodynamic challenges. Aim The aim of this work was to exploratively examine reports of adverse drug events of both drugs and to establish a comparative haemodynamic profile. Method Using data extracted from the World Health Organization’s pharmacovigilance database VigiBase, a descriptive analysis was performed of all reports for oxytocin and carbetocin as a suspected or interacting drug followed by a disproportionality analysis for haemodynamic events. Reporting odds ratios (ROR) of carbetocin for hypertension, hypotension, tachycardia, and bradycardia were calculated, with oxytocin-related reports serving as comparators. Results Oxytocin and carbetocin were mentioned as suspected or interacting drugs in 11,258 and 374 reports, respectively. Resulting RORs for carbetocin were 3.45 (95%CI: 1.72–6.92) for hypertension, 2.65 (1.64–4.28) for hypotension, 2.84 (1.79–4.49) for tachycardia, and 2.00 (0.87–4.60) for bradycardia, when compared to oxytocin. Of 231 patients for whom oxytocin-related tachycardia was reported, 2.6% died, and of 91 patients for whom bradycardia was reported, 2.2% died. No deaths were reported with carbetocin for any of the haemodynamic adverse events.ISSN:2210-7703ISSN:0928-1231ISSN:2210-771

Labor neuraxial analgesia and breastfeeding: an updated systematic review

Introduction: There have been numerous reports studying the effect of neuraxial analgesia on breastfeeding success, but the results are inconsistent. Methods: We performed a literature search in various databases for studies comparing neuraxial analgesia to non-neuraxial or no analgesia. Outcomes were the percentage of women breastfeeding fully or mixed with formula. Where possible, nulliparous parturients were analyzed separately. We conducted an analysis excluding studies of serious and critical risk of bias. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: We included 15 studies (13 observational studies, 1 secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, 1 case-control study) with 16,112 participants. Overall, there were 6 studies that found no difference between groups, 6 studies that showed a significantly lower incidence of breastfeeding in the neuraxial group and 3 studies finding mixed results (at some time-points statistically significant and at some time-point statistically non-significant results). In nulliparous only studies, 2 found no difference between study groups, 1 found a lower breastfeeding rate in the neuraxial group and 3 studies showed mixed results. Excluding studies with a serious and critical risk of bias, 1 study found no difference between study groups, 3 studies found a decrease of breastfeeding rates in the neuraxial group, and 1 study showed mixed results. Discussion: In our review we found a high disparity in results. One reason is probably the high potential of confounding (immediate skin to skin placement, maternity leave etc.). Education programs and breastfeeding support are likely more important in determining long term breastfeeding success

Transdermal nitroglycerin as an adjuvant to patient-controlled morphine analgesia after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Nitroglycerin (NTG) has been shown to be a useful adjunct for pain treatment without increasing adverse side effects. The effects of NTG on postoperative morphine consumption after knee replacement were evaluated

The effect of preoperative anxiety and ovarian stimulation on gastric antrum size: a prospective observational study

Pulmonary aspiration is a potentially lethal perioperative complication related to gastric size and contents. Several perioperative factors are believed to increase gastric size, while others are less studied. This prospective observational study aimed to investigate the effect of preoperative anxiety and hormone-induced ovarian stimulation on gastric size examined by gastric ultrasound. We recruited 49 female patients undergoing hormone-induced ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization at Rabin Medical Centre, Petah Tikva, Israel. Preoperatively, women ranked their anxiety level using a verbal numeric anxiety score (VNS). In addition, we recorded the extent of ovarian stimulation and measured the antral cross-sectional area (CSA) using gastric ultrasound. There was no substantial correlation between preoperative VNS anxiety and antral CSA (p = .697). Moreover, the number of follicles, blood estradiol, and progesterone levels did not correlate with antral CSA (p = .590, p = .104, and p = .511, respectively). In conclusion, neither preoperative anxiety nor extensive ovarian stimulation affects gastric size in fasting healthy patients. However, further studies are warranted in this area to define these findings better. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT0483353

Regional analgesia with or without general anaesthesia for breast cancer surgery: a network meta-analysis

Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:. To assess whether the analgesic efficacy and safety differ according to the regional analgesia technique used in women undergoing breast cancer surgery