22 research outputs found
Potential use of the Bushmint, Hyptis suaveolens, for the Control of Infestation by the Pink Stalk Borer, Sesamia calamistis on Maize in Southern Benin, West Africa
Maize production in Benin, especially in resource-poor farmers' fields, is constrained by stemborers among other factors. One of the major stemborers in southern Benin is Sesamia calamistis Hampson (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). African farmers cannot afford to use commercial insecticides for controlling stemborers - they are expensive and unsuitable for durable pest management systems due to eco-toxicity. There is therefore a need for cheaper and environmentally friendly methods and botanicals offer an attractive alternative. The bushmint, Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit. (Lamiales: Lamiaceae), was compared with the commercial insecticide Furadan (carbofuran) for the control of S. calamistis on maize Zea mays L. (Poales: Poaceae). Trials were conducted in the screenhouse and in the field during the minor cropping season in 2004 at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)-Benin station. The variables measured included numbers of egg masses per plant, eggs per egg mass (in the screenhouse study), population density of S. calamistis, percentage of infested plants and/or ears, and deadhearts in the field. Irrespective of the variable considered, the aqueous extract of H. suaveolens compared favorably with Furadan while maize surrounded by live H. suaveolens plants had lower S. calamistis densities
Biochemical components of wild relatives of chickpea confer resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera
Efforts are being made to develop chickpea varieties with resistance to the pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera for reducing
pesticide use and minimizing the extent of losses due to this pest. However, only low to moderate levels of resistance have
been observed in the cultivated chickpea to this polyphagous pest. Hence, it is important to explore wild relatives as resistance
sources to develop insect-resistant cultivars. Therefore, we studied different biochemical components that confer resistance to
H. armigera in a diverse array of wild relatives of chickpea. Accessions belonging to wild relatives of chickpea exhibited high
levels of resistance to H. armigera as compared to cultivated chickpea genotypes in terms of lower larval survival, pupation
and adult emergence, decreased larval and pupal weights, prolonged larval and pupal developmental periods and reduced
fecundity of the H. armigera when reared on artificial diet impregnated with lyophilized leaf powders. Amounts of proteins
and phenols in different accessions of chickpea wild relatives were significantly and negatively correlated with larval weight,
pupation and adult emergence. Phenols showed a negative correlation with pupal weight and fecundity, but positive correlation
with pupal period. Total soluble sugars showed a negative correlation with larval period, but positive correlation with
pupation and pupal weight, while tannins showed a positive correlation with larval weight, pupation and adult emergence.
The flavonoid compounds such as chlorogenic acid, ferulic acid, naringin, 3,4-dihydroxy flavones, quercetin, naringenin,
genistein, biochanin-A and formononetin that were identified through HPLC fingerprints, exhibited negative effects on survival
and development of H. armigera reared on artificial diet impregnated with lyophilized leaf powders. The wild relatives
with diverse mechanisms of resistance conferred by different biochemical components can be used as sources of resistance
in chickpea breeding programs to develop cultivars with durable resistance to H. armigera for sustainable crop production
Polyphagy and primary host plants: oviposition preference versus larval performance in the lepidopteran past Helicoverpa armigera
Oviposition preference and several measures of offspring performance of Helicoverpa armigera (HĂŒbner) were investigated on a subset of its host plants that were selected for their reputed importance in the field in Australia. They included cotton, pigeon pea, sweet corn, mungbean, bean and common sowthistle. Plants were at their flowering stage when presented to gravid female moths. Flowering pigeon pea evoked far more oviposition than did the other plant species and was the most preferred plant for neonate larval feeding. It also supported development of the most robust larvae and pupae, and these produced the most fecund moths. Common sowthistle and cotton were equally suitable to pigeon pea for larval development, but these two species received far fewer H. armigera eggs than did pigeon pea. Mungbean also received relatively few eggs, but it did support intermediate measures of larval growth and survival. Fewest eggs were laid on bean and it was also the least beneficial in terms of larval growth. Among the host plant species tested, only flowering pigeon pea supported a good relationship between oviposition preference of H. armigera and its subsequent offspring performance. Australian H. armigera moths are thus consistent with Indian H. armigera moths in their ovipositional behaviour and larval performance relative to pigeon pea. The results suggest that the host recognition and acceptance behaviour of this species is fixed across its geographical distribution and they support the theory that pigeon pea might be one of the primary host plants of this insect. These insights, together with published results on the sensory responses of the females to volatiles derived from the different host plant species tested here, help to explain why some plant species are primary targets for the ovipositing moths whereas others are only secondary targets of this polyphagous pest, which has a notoriously broad host range