Variability in flowering, fruit set and yield in response to vineyard topography and pruning type in Pinot noir

Aim: This study investigates the effects of site aspect and pruning management on flowering, fruit set and yield in Pinot noir vines. Methods: Two rows of 19-year-old Pinot noir vines were selected within a commercial vineyard with south, hilltop, and north-facing aspects. Vines were either cane- or spur-pruned, retaining 20 nodes per vine. One monitoring vine was selected at each sub-plot (consisting of four vines) and used to assess days to 50% flowering, fruit set (%) and days to 50% veraison. Total soluble solids samples were taken from each sub-plot and vines were harvested separately for yield. Results/Findings: Days to 50% flowering was affected by the topographical position. Vines from south-facing plots reached 50% flowering three days earlier during 2018-19 and eight days earlier 2020-21 compared to other plots. Cane pruning advanced the flowering date by one day compared with spur pruned vines (2019-20). Fruit set (%) was affected by topography. Vines from the hilltop plots had less than 50% fruit set during 2018-19 and 2020-21 compared to south and north plots (>70% fruit set). The lower fruit set was reflected in reduced yields. Despite the delayed flowering, vines from the hilltop position reached 50% veraison four days earlier than vines from the south and north plots during 2020–21. While there were initial differences in total soluble solids (at 7 to 8 oBrix) at six topographical positions, these variations disappeared by the time the vines were ready for a commercial harvest (>20 oBrix). The type of pruning generally had little effect on fruit set, the date of véraison or soluble solids at harvest, although cane pruning resulted in a 40% increase in yield in 2019–20 when compared to spur pruning. Conclusions: Flowering, fruit set, veraison, and vine yield were affected by topography (site aspect) and pruning type had little to no effect. Vine yield was a reflection of the fruit set (%) with differences between topographical positions. Positions with delayed veraison showed delayed soluble solids accumulation but reached a similar harvest soluble solids and yield

The influence of site aspect and pruning types on Pinot noir phenology and shoot growth

Aim: Managing the influence that terroir in vineyards has on vine development depends on improving our understanding the effect of the interaction of within-site variability, within-vine variability, and management practices (such as pruning types) on phenology and vine development. This study evaluates the consequence of site aspect and pruning management on budburst, leaf appearance rate, and shoot growth in Pinot noir vines. Methods and results: Two rows of 19-year-old Pinot noir vines were selected within a commercial vineyard with south, hilltop, and north-facing aspects (note: the north-facing slope is sun-facing in the Southern Hemisphere). Vines were either cane- or spur-pruned, retaining 20 nodes per vine. Budburst, shoot development, and leaf appearance were assessed, and vine trunk circumference was measured to quantify the accumulated differences in vine vigour. Hilltop plots had smaller trunk circumferences when compared to the south- and north-facing plots. Irrespective of topographical positions, budburst was earlier in cane-pruned vines compared to spur-pruned vines, but no differences were observed by the time of 12-leaf stage. The rate of shoot growth reflected the variations in topographical positions and trunk circumference. Cane-pruning exhibited more significant within-vine variation in budburst, budburst duration, and shoot growth when compared with spur-pruning. Shoots from hilltop vines were shorter relative to the vines at other plots for both pruning systems. Conclusions: The rate of shoot growth and development was associated more with site and vine vigour as determined by trunk circumference than pruning type. Spur-pruned vines had a later but more uniform budburst when compared to cane-pruned vines. Significance and impact of the study: Pruning type and within-site variability may lead to differences in canopy density and vine vigour, which can ultimately impact subsequent growth and development of the grapevine. Determining the influence of terroir within the vineyard on budburst, leaf appearance, and shoot growth variability will enable the development of improved phenology and growth models to describe within vineyard variability