Outlook for Independent Plastic Surgery Training: A Survey of Plastic Surgery Program Directors

INTRODUCTIONTraditionally, plastic surgery training occurs through the independent model after completion of another surgical residency. Training is a minimum of 3 years in duration. Integrated training in contrast commences upon completion of medical school and is a minimum of 6 years. Independent programs have increasingly been converting positions to integrated positions. Our survey was designed to evaluate possible plans for further conversion of independent positions to integrated positions. METHODSAn electronic survey was prepared using the online survey platform Qualtrics. The survey questions were designed to solicit information regarding plans to convert independent positions to integrated positions. The survey was distributed by e-mail to program directors of the independent programs participating in the 2019 match. A reminder was sent 3.5 weeks after initial distribution, and results were collected for an additional 3 weeks. RESULTSSixteen program directors responded to our survey including 15 complete responses and 1 partial response representing a 40% response rate. Four respondents reported that they are considering decreasing their independent program by 1 position and converting the position to an integrated position. Three respondents reported that they are considering eliminating their independent program and converting to an integrated program. Each of these programs reported their independent program as having 1 position per year. With only a 40% response rate, 7 or more positions may be converted to integrated positions in the coming years. CONCLUSIONSIndependent programs have been converting some or all positions to integrated positions. Although most plastic surgery positions were previously through the independent model, in 2019, 172 positions were offered through the integrated match compared with 63 for the independent match. Results of our study indicate that independent positions will continue to be converted to integrated positions for the next few years

Comparison of Costs and Outcomes for In-Office and Operating Room Excision of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer

With increasing health care expenses and limited resources, it is important to evaluate potential means of reducing cost while maintaining efficacy and safety. The purpose of our study was to compare the cost and outcomes of surgical excision of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in the operating room versus an outpatient procedure clinic. A retrospective review of patients undergoing excision of biopsy-confirmed NMSC at the Miami Veterans Affairs Hospital between December 1, 2015, and December 1, 2016, was completed. Patients treated in the operating room and procedure clinic were included. Treatment outcomes were assessed for all identified patients. Patients undergoing excision and primary closure were included for cost comparison.Procedure costs were estimated using Current Procedural Terminology codes for treatments provided and the 2017 conversion factor of $35.7751. If a second operation for positive margins was necessary, cost to treat the lesion included costs from both procedures. If multiple lesions were treated, total cost was divided by the number of lesions to calculate cost per lesion treated. Costs per lesion managed in the operating room and clinic were compared using the Student t test. Sixty-five patients underwent excision of 94 NMSCs in the operating room. Nineteen patients underwent excision of 20 NMSCs in the procedure clinic. One patient treated in the clinic required re-excision in the operating room with frozen section for a positive margin.Thirty-three patients managed in the operating room and 19 patients managed in the procedure clinic were included for cost analysis. Average costs per lesion excised in the operating room and procedure clinic were calculated to be$1923.43 ± 616.27 and $674.88 ± 575.22, respectively (P < 0.001). Excellent oncologic outcomes were achieved for both operating room and procedure clinic excision. Excision in the operating room excision was significantly more expensive than in the procedure clinic. Excision in a procedure clinic offers an opportunity to reduce costs while maintaining quality care

Large Forehead Mass Resulting From Chronic Head Banging

Head banging is a commonly observed movement disorder which is typically self-limited. Complications secondary to this behavior are rare. In this report, the authors present the case of a 15-year-old patient who was treated for a forehead mass which developed secondary to chronic head banging. Surgical excision was performed for treatment of the lesion. Results from surgical pathology were notable for fibrosis consistent with history of chronic head banging. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and physical examination were also consistent with this diagnosis. This is a rare clinical entity that should be considered in patients presenting with a forehead mass and a history of head banging

Plastic Surgery Training and the Problematic Resident: A Survey of Plastic Surgery Program Directors

Plastic surgery resident education is a significant commitment by both programs and residents. Unfortunately, problematic resident behavior may occur and be difficult to manage. This study was designed to survey plastic surgery program directors to elucidate their experience with problematic resident behavior. A electronic survey was prepared using the online platform, qualtrics. The survey was distributed by email to all plastic surgery program directors. Questions were designed to evaluate frequency of problematic behavior and methods to manage the behaviors. A reminder was sent 3 weeks after initial distribution. Responses were collected for an additional 3 weeks. Responses were pooled separately for integrated and independent program directors. Thirty-eight program directors responded including 10 independent and 28 integrated program directors. Integrated and independent program directors estimated prevalence of problematic behavior at 17.5 ± 14.4% and 11.8 ± 7.9%, respectively. Poor clinical skills/judgment and unprofessional behavior were the most commonly reported problematic behaviors by integrated program directors at 21% each. These were also the most commonly reported behaviors by independent program directors at 20.8% and 16.7%, respectively. Fourteen integrated program directors and 5 independent program directors reported having dismissed a resident. Only 5 integrated and 2 independent program directors reported warning signs in hindsight during the resident's initial application. Nine integrated program directors and 4 independent program directors reported at least sometimes reviewing applicant social media accounts. Prevalence of problematic behavior is estimated between 10% and 20% of plastic surgery residents. Type of problematic behavior are similar between integrated and independent residents. Warning signs on initial application are uncommon. As such, understanding problematic behaviors and methods to manage them are essential

Changes in Opioid Prescribing Patterns

With thousands of people in the United States dying of opioid overdose each month, the opioid epidemic has become a serious public health concern. Legislators have attempted to address this problem at various levels of the government. Evaluation of outcomes of these measures is a necessary part of resolving the epidemic. Our survey was designed to evaluate the impact of measures enacted in Florida State in 2018 upon prescribing practices of plastic surgeons. The survey was prepared electronically using the online Qualtrics platform. Survey questions were multiple choice and inquired regarding changes in prescribing practices after enactment of mandatory query of the prescription drug monitoring program database and prescribing limits in Florida. The survey was distributed by e-mail 1 year after these laws took effect. Two survey reminder e-mails were sent at 2-week intervals after the initial message. Results were collected for an additional 3 weeks after the final correspondence. Thirty-two survey responses were received after distribution to the 156 members of the Florida Society of Plastic Surgeons, for a response rate of 20.5%. Twenty-two respondents reported changing their prescribing practices. The most common change reported was decreased number of tablets prescribed. Most respondents reported they believe that mandatory prescription drug monitoring program query and prescribing limits will be effective. This included 17 (53.1%) and 18 (56.3%) respondents, respectively. Results from our survey indicate that Florida plastic surgeons have adjusted their prescribing practices in response to recently enacted legislation. Most plastic surgeons reported decreased number of tablets of opioids prescribed. Many also reported incorporating nonopioid analgesics. Further study will be necessary to determine the impact of these changes on rates of opioid overdose

The current format and ongoing advances of medical education in the United States

The objective of this study was to examine the current system of medical education along with the advances that are being made to support the demands of a changing health care system. American medical education must reform to anticipate the future needs of a changing health care system. Since the dramatic transformations to medical education that followed the publication of the Flexner report in 1910, medical education in the United States has largely remained unaltered. Today, the education of future physicians is undergoing modifications at all levels: premedical education, medical school, and residency training. Advances are being made with respect to curriculum design and content, standardized testing, and accreditation milestones. Fields such as plastic surgery are taking strides toward improving resident training as the next accreditation system is established. To promote more efficacious medical education, the American Medical Association has provided grants for innovations in education. Likewise, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education outlined 6 core competencies to standardize the educational goals of residency training. Such efforts are likely to improve the education of future physicians so that they are able to meet the future needs of American health care

Risk Factors for Capsular Contracture in Alloplastic Reconstructive and Augmentation Mammaplasty: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database

BACKGROUNDCapsular contracture is the most common complication of breast augmentation and reconstruction. It occurs in up to 45% of patients and is theorized to occur secondary to an immune reaction. It can lead to pain, dissatisfaction with aesthetic outcomes, and reoperation. The gold standard for management is capsulectomy. Prior similar studies are limited by narrow inclusion criteria, single-surgeon analysis, small sample size, or univariate analysis. The goal of the following study is to prospectively identify possible risk factors for capsular contracture using a national database. METHODSA retrospective review was conducted utilizing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database of prospectively collected data of patients undergoing periprosthetic and/or total capsulectomy for capsular contracture from 2013 to 2016. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for variables using a multivariable binary logistic regression model. RESULTSA total of 6547 patients underwent reconstructive or augmentation mammaplasty with a prosthetic implant, out of which 2543 (39%) underwent capsulectomy. Capsular contracture was more likely in older (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.09-1.10, p<.001), overweight (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.10-1.13, p<.001), and cancer patients (OR: 7.71, 95% CI: 2.22-28.8, p=0.001). Wound infection was associated with capsulectomy (OR: 6.69, 95% CI: 1.74-25.8, p<.001). CONCLUSIONThese identified risk factors should be comprehensively addressed with patients during the informed consent process before breast augmentation or reconstruction with implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IIIThis journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266