Ruxolitinib Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Children with Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral ruxolitinib in children with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (age &lt;12 years) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (age ≤18 years) using our published pediatric dosing. PK sampling was performed before and 2 hours after ruxolitinib administration in patients with established cGVHD. More extensive PK analyses were performed in patients with newly diagnosed aGVHD or cGVHD before and .5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after ruxolitinib administration in patients weighing &gt;10 kg and before, 3+, and 6+ hours in children weighing &lt;10 kg. pSTAT1, pSTAT3, and pSTAT5 expression levels were measured on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells before and 2 hours after ruxolitinib administration as a pharmacodynamic marker of JAK/STAT inhibition. Thirteen patients were prospectively enrolled, including 8 with existing cGVHD (age 0 to ≤18 years), 4 with new-onset steroid-refractory aGVHD (age 0 to &lt;12 years) and 1 with newly diagnosed steroid-refractory cGVHD. Great variability in PK was seen. Mean oral clearance (CL/F) was 7.76 ± 4.09 L/h (range, 3.1 to 15.3 L/h). The average elimination half-life was 2.32 ± 1.0 hours. Mean ruxolitinib clearance was higher in children age &lt;2 years versus those age &gt;2 years (12.1 ± 3.0 L/h versus 5.7 ± 2.8 L/h; P = .005) and was reduced with concurrent treatment with azoles and azithromycin. We saw a variable reduction in pSTAT1/3/5 expression on T cells at time of peak ruxolitinib absorption (2 hours after dosing). Children &lt;10 kg had lower ruxolitinib exposure, possibly due to inherent increased drug clearance or variability in dosing methods, leading to decreased drug absorption.</p

Preventative treatment of tuberous sclerosis complex with sirolimus: Phase I safety and efficacy results

Objective Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) results from overactivity of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR). Sirolimus and everolimus are mTOR inhibitors that treat most facets of TSC but are understudied in infants. We sought to understand the safety and potential efficacy of preventative sirolimus in infants with TSC. Methods We conducted a phase 1 clinical trial of sirolimus, treating five patients until 12 months of age. Enrolled infants had to be younger than 6 months of age with no history of seizures and no clinical indication for sirolimus treatment. Adverse events (AEs), tolerability, and blood concentrations of sirolimus measured by tandem mass spectrometry were tracked through 12 months of age, and clinical outcomes (seizure characteristics and developmental profiles) were tracked through 24 months of age. Results There were 92 AEs, with 34 possibly, probably, or definitely related to treatment. Of those, only two were grade 3 (both elevated lipids) and all AEs were resolved by the age of 24 months. During the trial, 94% of blood sirolimus trough levels were in the target range (5–15 ng/mL). Treatment was well tolerated, with less than 8% of doses held because of an AE (241 of 2941). Of the five patients, three developed seizures (but were well controlled on medications) at 24 months of age. Of the five patients, four had normal cognitive development for age. One was diagnosed with possible autism spectrum disorder. Interpretation These results suggest that sirolimus is both safe and well tolerated by infants with TSC in the first year of life. Additionally, the preliminary work suggests a favorable efficacy profile compared with previous TSC cohorts not exposed to early sirolimus treatment. Results support sirolimus being studied as preventive treatment in TSC, which is now underway in a prospective phase 2 clinical trial (TSC‐STEPS)