10 research outputs found
Employees as judges in Europe's labour courts: a conflict of interest?
Labour courts in many European countries have a tripartite structure, with a professional judge sitting with employer and employee lay judges. This article focuses on employee judges, who face a potential conflict between their partisan role defending workers and their role as an impartial judge. Using cognitive dissonance as our theoretical framework and drawing on over a 100 interviews in three European countries, we found that many British and German interviewees said that they had not experienced any conflict of interests. Others, however, reported such conflict, especially initially, and demonstrated adaptation strategies that appeared consistent with cognitive dissonance theory. Moreover, there were national variations: conflict in France appeared more pervasive and enduring than in Britain or Germany
La mise en oeuvre par les assureurs de la procedure d'offre d'indemnisation des victimes d'accidents corporels de la circulation Note d'etape
SIGLEAvailable at INIST (FR), Document Supply Service, under shelf-number : RP 13661 / INIST-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et TechniqueFRFranc
Recommended from our members
The politics of in-work benefits: the case of the 'active income of solidarity' in France
In-work benefits have been introduced in a number of Bismarckian welfare regimes in a context of austerity despite being targeted at politically weak constituents and representing a deviation from prevailing welfare institutions. This article addresses this puzzle by looking at the introduction in 2008 of an in-work benefit scheme in France, the Active Income of Solidarity. The analysis reveals that this reform was the result of a crosscutting alliance between the conservative party and employers, as well as parts of the socialist party and the union movement. The alliance was possible thanks to actors' multiple interpretations of the reform. The reform was difficult to oppose given its support by experts and public opinion and because it entailed an increase in revenues for low-income workers