27 research outputs found

    Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Self-Renew and Differentiate According to a Deterministic Hierarchy

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND:Mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs) have been isolated from a variety of connective tissues, and are commonly called "mesenchymal stem cells" (MSCs). A stem cell is defined as having robust clonal self-renewal and multilineage differentiation potential. Accordingly, the term "MSC" has been criticised, as there is little data demonstrating self-renewal of definitive single-cell-derived (SCD) clonal populations from a mesenchymal cell source. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:Here we show that a tractable MPC population, human umbilical cord perivascular cells (HUCPVCs), was capable of multilineage differentiation in vitro and, more importantly, contributed to rapid connective tissue healing in vivo by producing bone, cartilage and fibrous stroma. Furthermore, HUCPVCs exhibit a high clonogenic frequency, allowing us to isolate definitive SCD parent and daughter clones from mixed gender suspensions as determined by Y-chromosome fluorescent in situ hybridization. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:Analysis of the multilineage differentiation capacity of SCD parent clones and daughter clones enabled us to formulate a new hierarchical schema for MSC self-renewal and differentiation in which a self-renewing multipotent MSC gives rise to more restricted self-renewing progenitors that gradually lose differentiation potential until a state of complete restriction to the fibroblast is reached

    Analysis of routine intensive care unit admission following fronto-orbital advancement for craniosynostosis.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Intensive care unit admission following fronto-orbital advancement for craniosynostosis is routine at most institutions. The authors determined the frequency of postoperative events requiring intensive care unit care that justify this practice. METHODS: Infants with craniosynostosis who underwent primary fronto-orbital advancement at a single institution from 1997 to 2011 were included. Patient demographics, operative factors, and hemodynamic outcomes were recorded. Adverse postoperative events/interventions were graded as none (group I); minor (group II), easily managed on a surgical floor; or major (group III), requiring intensive care unit care. RESULTS: One hundred seven infants were included. Average length of hospitalization was 3.7 ± 1.6 days, with 1.3 ± 1.0 days in the intensive care unit and 2.4 ± 1.0 days on the floor. Seventy-eight patients (72.9 percent) were categorized into group I, 24 (22.4 percent) into group II, and five (4.7 percent) into group III. Major events/interventions included prolonged intubation (n = 2), reintubation (n = 2), and continuous positive airway pressure support (n = 1). Preexisting end-organ dysfunction was significantly associated with group III patients, who also had significantly higher intraoperative blood loss requiring greater resuscitation. Mean daily charges were 7652.33(10.9percentoftotalcharges)forintensivecareunitcareand7652.33 (10.9 percent of total charges) for intensive care unit care and 2470.62 (6.9 percent of total charges) for floor care. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 4.7 percent of patients had event/interventions requiring intensive care unit care after fronto-orbital advancement. Predictors included preexisting end-organ dysfunction and higher intraoperative blood loss requiring greater resuscitation. Financial savings from selective postoperative intensive care unit admission may not outweigh the potential cost of an emergent event on the surgical floor
    corecore