Operative results and outcome of twenty-four totally laparoscopic vascular procedures for aortoiliac occlusive disease

AbstractPurpose: The study objective was to apply laparoscopic techniques to conventional bypass procedures for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Methods: From October 1995 to August 1997, we performed seven iliofemoral (IFB), five unilateral aortofemoral (UAFB), and 11 aortobifemoral (AFB) bypass procedures and one aortic endarterectomy (TEA) totally laparoscopic. A transabdominal approach with pneumoperitoneum was preferred, and only laparoscopic vascular instruments were used. Endoscopic intervention followed principles of vascular surgery. As in open surgery, we used Dacron grafts and polypropylene sutures. Results: Twenty procedures were carried out totally laparoscopic; four conversions to open surgery were necessary. Severe complications included one postoperative respiratory failure requiring ventilatory support for four days, and one iliac vein lesion with subsequent open surgery. Mean operating time was 258 ± 49 minutes for IFB, 218 ± 54 minutes for UAFB, 279 ± 69 minutes for AFB, and 290 minutes for aortic TEA. Mean blood loss was 92 ± 49 ml for IFB, 390 ± 316 ml for UAFB, 563 ± 516 ml for AFB, and 100 ml for aortic TEA. Mean postoperative stay was 7.4 days for IFB, 7.8 days for UAFB, and 10.1 days for AFB. After the aortic TEA, the patient was discharged on day 6. At control examination all grafts were patent; two patients had mild claudication because of one progressive disease and one distal suture stenosis. Conclusion: Laparoscopic vascular surgery for aortoiliac occlusive disease is feasible, safe, and effective. At the beginning, a cooperation between experienced laparoscopists and vascular surgeons is needed to overcome procedural challenge, because operating time and conversion rate decrease with growing experience. The advantages observed in the majority of our patients were minimal tissue trauma, decreased blood loss, and faster postoperative recovery when compared with patients who had open aortic surgery at our institution. Further evidence has to be gained by clinical trials to define the role of laparoscopic vascular surgery for aortoiliac occlusive disease. (J Vasc Surg 1998;28:136-42.

Risk factors for multimodal conservative approach failure before bariatric surgery

$\bf Background:$ A multimodal conservative approach (MCA) is internationally recommended prior to bariatric surgery for the majority of patients. This research aimed to identify risk factors for therapy failure within the MCA. $\bf Methods:$ This study was conducted in a German bariatric obesity centre. Patients who underwent a 3- to 6-month preoperative MCA from November 2019 to October 2020 were prospectively recorded and analysed. MCA included dietary and movement therapy, psychological and endocrinological referral and connection to a patient support group. The change in BMI was considered the main parameter for therapeutic success. Explanatory factors were evaluated for this outcome of interest and included physical and mental well-being (SF-36), perceived stress (DASS-21), social and economic situation and educational background (SOEP). $\bf Results:$ Out of 413 eligible patients, 209 were analysed. Overall, patients gained BMI (average gain 0.23 $kg/m^{2}$ (s.d. 1.44 $kg/m^{2}$)) during the preoperative MCA. Diverse social, demographic and economic and health properties did not influence the course of the therapy. There was a significant positive correlation between successful loss of BMI and physical well-being ($\beta$ = 0.03, 95% c.i. 0.01 to 0.04, $\it P$ < 0.0001) and a negative correlation between mental well-being ($\beta$ = −0.02, 95% c.i. −0.004 to −0.001, $\it P$ = 0.001) as well as self-perceived stress ($\beta$ = −0.05, 95% c.i. −0.09 to −0.01, $\it P$ = 0.019), although these effects were small and did not affect the overall trend of gaining BMI during MCA. $\bf Conclusion:$ The current therapeutic approach of preoperative conservative treatment within the multimodal concept of bariatric treatment fails to achieve its intended outcome. A different conservative weight loss programme from the pre-bariatric setting, which should focus on a surgical preparation, is therefore recommended

Review: sex-specific aspects in the bariatric treatment of severely obese women

This systematic literature review aims to point out sex-specific special features that are important in the bariatric treatment of women suffering from severe obesity. A systematic literature search was carried out according to Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. After the literature selection, the following categories were determined: sexuality and sexual function; contraception; fertility; sex hormones and polycystic ovary syndrome; menopause and osteoporosis; pregnancy and breastfeeding; pelvic floor disorders and urinary incontinence; female-specific cancer; and metabolism, outcome, and quality of life. For each category, the current status of research is illuminated and implications for bariatric treatment are determined. A summary that includes key messages is given for each subsection. An overall result of this paper is an understanding that sex-specific risks that follow or result from bariatric surgery should be considered more in aftercare. In order to increase the evidence, further research focusing on sex-specific differences in the outcome of bariatric surgery and promising treatment approaches to female-specific diseases is needed. Nevertheless, bariatric surgery shows good potential in the treatment of sex-specific aspects for severely obese women that goes far beyond mere weight loss and reduction of metabolic risks