Findings of pilot study following the implementation of point of care intraoperative PTH assay using whole blood during surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism

Objective: To report findings of pilot study using a novel point of care (POC) intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) assay for parathyroid hormone (PTH) using whole blood during surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Methods: Patients undergoing surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism from March to November 2022 where intraoperative PTH assay was performed using the NBCL CONNECT IOPTH and the laboratory PTH assay were included (group 1). The biochemistry results were reviewed to determine concordance between NBCL and lab PTH values and diagnostic test parameters of the NBCL CONNECT assay. ‘In-theatre’ times were then compared with a historical cohort (group 2) where the lab-based IOPTH assay alone was used. Results: Of the 141 paired samples in group I, correlation between NBCL and the lab assay was high (rho=0.82; p50% of the basal or 0 min sample; whichever was lower – i.e. positive test) in 23 patients; giving a positive predictive value of 100%. Of the 9 patients that did not demonstrate a drop, two were true negative (negative predictive value of 22%) leading to cure after excision of another gland. Group 1 (150 mins) had a significantly shorter ‘in-theatre’ time compared to group 2 (167 mins) (p=0.007); despite much higher use of near infra-red autofluorescence (NIRAF) (72% vs 11.6% in group I and 2 respectively). Conclusion: The NBCL CONNECT POC IOPTH assay gives comparable results to lab based PTH assays and can be performed without need for a centrifuge or qualified technicians. Surgeons, however, need to be aware of the potential for false-negative results

General anaesthetic and airway management practice for obstetric surgery in England: a prospective, multi-centre observational study

There are no current descriptions of general anaesthesia characteristics for obstetric surgery, despite recent changes to patient baseline characteristics and airway management guidelines. This analysis of data from the direct reporting of awareness in maternity patients' (DREAMY) study of accidental awareness during obstetric anaesthesia aimed to describe practice for obstetric general anaesthesia in England and compare with earlier surveys and best-practice recommendations. Consenting patients who received general anaesthesia for obstetric surgery in 72 hospitals from May 2017 to August 2018 were included. Baseline characteristics, airway management, anaesthetic techniques and major complications were collected. Descriptive analysis, binary logistic regression modelling and comparisons with earlier data were conducted. Data were collected from 3117 procedures, including 2554 (81.9%) caesarean deliveries. Thiopental was the induction drug in 1649 (52.9%) patients, compared with propofol in 1419 (45.5%). Suxamethonium was the neuromuscular blocking drug for tracheal intubation in 2631 (86.1%), compared with rocuronium in 367 (11.8%). Difficult tracheal intubation was reported in 1 in 19 (95%CI 1 in 16-22) and failed intubation in 1 in 312 (95%CI 1 in 169-667). Obese patients were over-represented compared with national baselines and associated with difficult, but not failed intubation. There was more evidence of change in practice for induction drugs (increased use of propofol) than neuromuscular blocking drugs (suxamethonium remains the most popular). There was evidence of improvement in practice, with increased monitoring and reversal of neuromuscular blockade (although this remains suboptimal). Despite a high risk of difficult intubation in this population, videolaryngoscopy was rarely used (1.9%)