8 research outputs found

    A Canine Model to Assess the Biochemical Stress Response to Laparoscopic and Open Surgery

    Full text link
    Purpose: To develop an animal model to assess the stress response to open and laparoscopic surgery. Such a model would allow objective physiologic assessment of the putative benefits of laparoscopy and provide a framework in which to compare modifications in operative and anesthetic technique that might decrease the stress of surgery. Materials and Methods: Mongrel dogs underwent laparoscopic (N = 12) or open surgical (N = 12) left nephrectomy. In 11 control animals, after induction of anesthesia and line placement, the animal underwent either no intervention (open surgery sham; N = 6) or pneumoperitoneum only (laparoscopic sham; N = 5). Serum glucose and cortisol were measured preoperatively, at skin closure, and at 4, 8, and 24 hours postoperatively. Values at each time point were compared in the laparoscopic and open surgical nephrectomy groups and in each of the two nephrectomy groups and their respective shams. Results: Compared with baseline, there was a sharp rise in serum cortisol at the time of skin closure, with a gradual decline to baseline values by 24 hours, in all experimental animals. Significantly lower serum cortisol concentrations were seen at 4 and 8 hours postoperatively in the laparoscopic group than in the open surgery group. Cortisol was significantly higher in the open group than in the sham-open group at all time points, whereas cortisol was greater in the laparoscopic group than in the pneumoperitoneum-only group only at the 4-hour time point. No differences were seen in serum glucose between groups. Conclusions: The serum cortisol concentration appears to be a good measure of surgical stress in the canine model. The rapid decline in serum cortisol after laparoscopy compared with open surgery may indicate a lesser degree, or quicker resolution, of surgical stress in the former. Furthermore, the similarity in cortisol curves between laparoscopy and pneumoperitoneum only suggests that surgical stress in laparoscopic surgery may be attributable mainly to the effects of pneumoperitoneum.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/63212/1/089277901317203100.pd

    Laparoscopic Nephron-Sparing Surgery for a Renal Mass: 1-Year Minimum Follow-Up

    Full text link
    Background and Purpose: Because of the explosion of laparoscopy in urology coinciding with the excellent results of open nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for small renal masses, laparoscopic NSS has become an alternative to an open surgical approach. We report our results with laparoscopic NSS in patients who have had a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Patients and Methods: All consecutive laparoscopic partial nephrectomies from November 1998 through February 2002 were assessed. The mean patient age, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiology score were 57.1 years, 28.5 cm/kg2, and 2.0, respectively. The procedures were performed using hand-assisted (N = 28) or standard (N = 12) laparoscopic techniques. Hospital records were reviewed in order to obtain operative, perioperative, and follow-up data. Results: The median operating room time, estimated blood loss, and hospital stay were 184 minutes, 300 mL, and 2.0 days, respectively. No patients were converted to an open surgical procedure. Four patients (10%) required a blood transfusion, and one (2.5%) had a postoperative urinoma. The mean tumor size was 2.3 cm. Twenty-nine lesions were renal-cell carcinoma, and 11 were benign. With a mean CT scan follow-up of 100.0 weeks, there has not been any recurrence of renal-cell carcinoma. Conclusion: Laparoscopic NSS can be performed with acceptable complication rates, which will continue to decrease as newer methods of controlling hemostasis are developed. Although follow-up is fairly short, no renal-cell carcinoma recurrences have appeared. At this point in time, the oncologic efficacy of a laparoscopic approach appears to mirror that of the open surgical technique.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/63359/1/end.2004.18.783.pd

    Partial nephrectomy should be classified as an inpatient procedure: Results from a statewide quality improvement collaborative

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES: To examine length of stay (LOS) and readmission rates for all minimally-invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) and MI radical nephrectomy (MIRN) performed for localized renal masses ≤7 cm in size (cT1RM) within 12 Michigan urology practices. Both RN and PN are commonly performed in treating cT1RM. Although technically more complex and associated with higher complication rates, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services considers MIPN an outpatient procedure and MIRN is inpatient. METHODS: We collected data for renal surgeries for cT1RM at MUSIC-KIDNEY practices between May 2017-February 2020. Data abstractors recorded clinical, radiographic, pathologic, surgical, and short-term follow-up data into the registry for cT1RM patients. RESULTS: Within MUSIC-KIDNEY, 807 patients underwent MI renal surgery at 12 practices. Median LOS for cT1RM patients after MIPN (n = 531, 66%) was 2 days and after MIRN (n = 276, 34%) was also 2 days. Among patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic PN, 171 (32%), 230 (43%), and 130 (24%) stayed ≤1, 2, ≥3 days. Among patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic RN, 81 (29%), 112 (41%), and 83 (30%) stayed ≤1, 2, ≥3 days. No significant difference was observed between MIPN and MIRN on LOS commensurate with outpatient surgery (≤1-day, OR = 0.97, P = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Less than one-third of patients had a LOS ≤1-day and LOS was comparable for MIPN and MIRN. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services should be advised that MIPN is a more complex surgery than MIRN, most patients receiving a MIPN will require a ≥2-day hospital stay and it would be more appropriate to classify MIPN an inpatient procedure with MIRN

    Age, sex, colour and disability discrimination in America

    No full text
    corecore