Challenges in the Implementation of the NeoOBS Study, a Global Pragmatic Observational Cohort Study, to Investigate the Aetiology and Management of Neonatal Sepsis in the Hospital Setting

Neonatal sepsis is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in low- and middle-income countries. To deliver high-quality data studies and inform future trials, it is crucial to understand the challenges encountered when managing global multi-centre research studies and to identify solutions that can feasibly be implemented in these settings. This paper provides an overview of the complexities faced by diverse research teams in different countries and regions, together with actions implemented to achieve pragmatic study management of a large multi-centre observational study of neonatal sepsis. We discuss specific considerations for enrolling sites with different approval processes and varied research experience, structures, and training. Implementing a flexible recruitment strategy and providing ongoing training were necessary to overcome these challenges. We emphasize the attention that must be given to designing the database and monitoring plans. Extensive data collection tools, complex databases, tight timelines, and stringent monitoring arrangements can be problematic and might put the study at risk. Finally, we discuss the complexities added when collecting and shipping isolates and the importance of having a robust central management team and interdisciplinary collaborators able to adapt easily and make swift decisions to deliver the study on time and to target. With pragmatic approaches, appropriate training, and good communication, these challenges can be overcome to deliver high-quality data from a complex study in challenging settings through a collaborative research network

Challenges in the Implementation of the NeoOBS Study, a Global Pragmatic Observational Cohort Study, to Investigate the Aetiology and Management of Neonatal Sepsis in the Hospital Setting.

Neonatal sepsis is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in low- and middle-income countries. To deliver high-quality data studies and inform future trials, it is crucial to understand the challenges encountered when managing global multi-centre research studies and to identify solutions that can feasibly be implemented in these settings. This paper provides an overview of the complexities faced by diverse research teams in different countries and regions, together with actions implemented to achieve pragmatic study management of a large multi-centre observational study of neonatal sepsis. We discuss specific considerations for enrolling sites with different approval processes and varied research experience, structures, and training. Implementing a flexible recruitment strategy and providing ongoing training were necessary to overcome these challenges. We emphasize the attention that must be given to designing the database and monitoring plans. Extensive data collection tools, complex databases, tight timelines, and stringent monitoring arrangements can be problematic and might put the study at risk. Finally, we discuss the complexities added when collecting and shipping isolates and the importance of having a robust central management team and interdisciplinary collaborators able to adapt easily and make swift decisions to deliver the study on time and to target. With pragmatic approaches, appropriate training, and good communication, these challenges can be overcome to deliver high-quality data from a complex study in challenging settings through a collaborative research network

Population pharmacokinetics of unbound and total dolutegravir concentrations in children aged 12 years and older: a PK substudy of the SMILE trial

BACKGROUND SMILE, a multicentre randomized trial, compared the efficacy and safety of switching virologically suppressed children and adolescents with HIV to a once-daily dual regimen of dolutegravir plus ritonavir-boosted darunavir versus continuing standard ART. Within a nested pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy, we performed a population PK analysis to describe total and unbound dolutegravir plasma concentrations in children and adolescents receiving this dual therapy. METHODS Sparse blood samples were obtained during follow-up for dolutegravir quantification. A population PK model was developed to simultaneously describe total and unbound dolutegravir concentrations. Simulations were performed and were compared with the protein-adjusted 90% inhibitory concentration (IC90) and the in vitro IC50, respectively. Dolutegravir exposures in children aged ≥12 years were also compared with values in treatment-experienced adults. RESULTS Four hundred and fifty-five samples from 153 participants aged between 12 and 18 years were collected for this PK analysis. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best described unbound dolutegravir concentrations. The relationship between unbound and total dolutegravir concentrations was best characterized by a non-linear model. Unbound dolutegravir apparent clearance was significantly influenced by total bilirubin concentrations and by Asian ethnicity. All children and adolescents had trough concentrations well above the protein-adjusted IC90 and the in vitro IC50 values. Dolutegravir concentrations and exposures were also similar to those obtained in adults receiving dolutegravir 50 mg once daily. CONCLUSIONS A once-daily 50 mg dolutegravir dose for children and adolescents produces adequate total and unbound concentrations when used as part of dual therapy with ritonavir-boosted darunavir