26 research outputs found

    Implantation of a poly-L-lactide GCSF-functionalized scaffold in a model of chronic myocardial infarction

    Get PDF
    A previously developed poly-l-lactide scaffold releasing granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PLLA/GCSF) was tested in a rabbit chronic model of myocardial infarction (MI) as a ventricular patch. Control groups were constituted by healthy, chronic MI and nonfunctionalized PLLA scaffold. PLLA-based electrospun scaffold efficiently integrated into a chronic infarcted myocardium. Functionalization of the biopolymer with GCSF led to increased fibroblast-like vimentin-positive cellular colonization and reduced inflammatory cell infiltration within the micrometric fiber mesh in comparison to nonfunctionalized scaffold; PLLA/GCSF polymer induced an angiogenetic process with a statistically significant increase in the number of neovessels compared to the nonfunctionalized scaffold; PLLA/GCSF implanted at the infarcted zone induced a reorganization of the ECM architecture leading to connective tissue deposition and scar remodeling. These findings were coupled with a reduction in end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes, indicating a preventive effect of the scaffold on ventricular dilation, and an improvement in cardiac performance

    Coronary computed tomography angiography in acute chest pain: a sustainable model with remote support

    Get PDF
    Purpose: To propose a sustainable model of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) use in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in emergency department (ED) using a partially based teleradiology reporting model. We also analyzed impact of the protocol on short- and long-term patient's outcome. Methods: During a 12-month period, 104 consecutive patients admitted to the ED for acute chest pain (ACP) with low-to-intermediate risk of ACS were selected and underwent CCTA. Medical reporting was based on a model combining on-site physician and a remote radiologist supported by a web client-based teleradiology system, covering a 24/7 service. CCTA findings were correlated with the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) over a 5-year follow-up. Results: CCTA ruled-out CAD in 76 patients (73.1%). Moderate (7.7%) to severe (19.2%) CAD was identified in 28 patients who were directly referred to functional tests or invasive angiography. The mean discharge time was 10.8 Â± 5.8 h; patients with absent to mild disease were safely and quickly discharged. Remote reporting using a teleradiology platform was performed in 82/104 cases (78.9%), with slight impact on patient's discharge time (10.4 Â± 5.6 vs. 12.1 Â± 6.1 h, p: 0.24). MACEs at 6-month and at 5-year follow-up were 0.96% (n = 1/104) and 15.5% (n = 14/90). Conclusion: CCTA assessment of patients with ACP enables to quickly rule-out ACS, avoiding waste of time and resources, to identify patients with obstructive CAD which should be referred to subsequent tests and to stratify the risk of MACEs at short and long time. A partial teleradiology based 24/7 CCTA service is feasible and sustainable, even in small ED

    ‘Hook-wire’ breast marker migrating to the heart

    No full text

    Anatomical variations of the trochlear notch angle: MRI analysis of 78 elbows

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Little is known about the anatomical variations of the trochlear notch angle, nor do we know whether the cartilaginous layer modifies the trochlear bony contour. Our aim was to assess the variability of the bony and cartilaginous trochlear notch angles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed 78 healthy elbows (39 patients, 19 females and 20 males) with a mean age of 28 years (range 21-32). High-definition MRI coronal scans at the level of the flexion-extension axis were performed. The cartilage thickness, the notch angle, and trochlear width were calculated at the level of the deepest point of the trochlear sulcus, the edge of the lateral and medial ridge. Patient height was used as indirect measurement of humerus length. Pearson correlation and Student's t tests were performed. RESULTS: Mean cartilage thickness was 1.00 mm (range 0.62-1.83), with significant differences between the medial trochlear ridge and the other landmarks. The notch angle ranged from 124° to 156° (mean 142°) with no differences between the bony and cartilage layers. Trochlear width ranged from 1.57 to 2.75 cm (mean 2.24) and correlated with humerus length. No correlation emerged between the trochlear notch angle, trochlear width, or humerus length. The only significant difference between sexes was the width value, with a wider trochlea in males. CONCLUSIONS: The trochlear notch angle varies considerably, determining anatomical variations in trochlear shape which ranges from less concave to more concave types. Moreover, the cartilaginous layer does not modify this angle at the level examined. These findings may be relevant to anatomical implant design for distal humerus hemiarthroplasty

    The ulnar greater sigmoid notch "coverage angle": Bone and cartilage contribution. Magnetic resonance imaging anatomic study on 78 elbows

    No full text
    Background: To study the degree of coverage provided by the greater sigmoid notch (GSN) to the humeral trochlea, as well as the contribution of the olecranon and coronoid process cartilage tips to this angle, and its variations. Methods: We recruited 39 healthy volunteers, comprising 19 women and 20 men, with a mean age of 28 years (range, 21-32 years). High-definition magnetic resonance images were obtained for the right and left elbows. Four angles were measured on the sagittal plane passing through the coronoid and olecranon tips: angle A, identified by 2 lines from the trochlea center to the olecranon bone-cartilage junction and olecranon cartilage tip; angle B, identified by 2 lines from the trochlea center to the olecranon and coronoid bone-cartilage junction; angle C, identified by 2 lines from the trochlea center to the coronoid bone-cartilage junction and coronoid cartilage tip; and GSN coverage angle (GSN-ca), defined as the sum of angles A, B, and C. Pearson correlation tests, t tests, and intraclass correlation coefficients were used for statistical analyses. Results: The mean angle A, angle B, and angle C values were 6° (range, 2°-12°), 182° (range, 153°-204°), and 9° (range, 2°-16°), respectively. No correlations were found between these 3 angles. The mean GSN-ca was 198° (range, 167°-222°), and the GSN-ca was less than 180° in 8% of the cases. No significant differences emerged for side or gender or for total length of the ulna. Conclusion: The GSN showed significantly different shapes on the sagittal plane that we defined as closed type when the GSN-ca was greater than 180° (92%) and as open type when the GSA-ca was less than 180° (8%). The cartilage tip contribution varied and was not correlated with that of bone

    Contribution of cartilage to size and shape of radial head circumference: magnetic resonance imaging analysis of 78 elbows

    No full text
    Background: The aims of our study were to quantify cartilage thickness at the minimum and maximum diameters of the radial head circumference and to investigate its influence on the size and shape of the proximal radius. Methods: We analyzed high-definition magnetic resonance imaging scans of 78 healthy elbows in 19 men and 20 women, with a mean age of 28 (21-32) years. All measurements were estimated in the axial plane just distal to the fovea radialis. Maximum and minimum bone diameters, maximum and minimum total diameters (including cartilage thickness), and cartilage thickness were calculated. Cartilage thickness was measured at 4 different points: (1) at the articular side of the maximum diameter (point A), (2) at the nonarticular side of the maximum diameter (point B), (3) at the medial side of the minimum diameter (point C), and (4) at the lateral side of the minimum diameter (point D). Pearson correlation and t test were used for the statistical analysis. Results: Mean maximum and minimum bone diameters and maximum and minimum total diameters were 22.2, 21.5, 24.0, and 23.2 mm, respectively. All differences between diameters were statistically significant. Mean cartilage thickness at points A, C, and D was 1.7, 0.8, and 0.8 mm, respectively. No measurable cartilage thickness was found at point B. No significant correlation was found between bone diameters and cartilage thickness. Conclusions: Cartilage surface significantly increases and modifies the size and shape of the radial head. The observation that cartilage thickness varies between subjects and does not correlate with bone parameters suggests that the diameters of the radial head cannot be inferred from indirect measurements of dry bones or radiographs
    corecore