4 research outputs found
Post-mortem whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses: a comparison of 3-T vs. 1.5-T MR imaging with classical autopsy
Objective: To prospectively compare diagnostic accuracy of fetal post-mortem whole-body MRI at 3-T vs. 1.5-T. Methods: Between 2012 and 2015, post-mortem MRI at 1.5-T and 3-T was performed in fetuses after miscarriage/stillbirth or termination. Clinical MRI diagnoses were assessed using a confidence diagnostic score and compared with classical autopsy to derive a diagnostic error score. The relation of diagnostic error for each organ group with gestational age was calculated and 1.5-T with 3-T was compared with accuracy analysis. Results: 135 fetuses at 12–41 weeks underwent post-mortem MRI (followed by conventional autopsy in 92 fetuses). For all organ groups except the brain, and for both modalities, the diagnostic error decreased with gestation (P < 0.0001). 3-T MRI diagnostic error was significantly lower than that of 1.5-T for all anatomic structures and organ groups, except the orbits and brain. This difference was maintained for fetuses <20 weeks gestation. Moreover, 3-T was associated with fewer non-diagnostic scans and greater concordance with classical autopsy than 1.5-T MRI, especially for the thorax, heart and abdomen in fetuses <20 weeks. Conclusion: Post-mortem fetal 3-T MRI improves confidence scores and overall accuracy compared with 1.5-T, mainly for the thorax, heart and abdomen of fetuses <20 weeks of gestation. Key Points: • In PM-MRI, diagnostic error using 3-T is lower than that with 1.5-T. • In PM-MRI, diagnostic scan rate is higher using 3-T than 1.5-T. • In PM-MRI, concordance with classical autopsy increases with 3-T. • PM-MRI using 3-T is particularly interesting for thoracic and abdominal organs. • PM-MRI using 3-T is particularly interesting for fetuses < 20 weeks’ gestation.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe
Learning effect on perinatal post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging reporting: single reporter diagnostic accuracy of 200 cases
Objective: The objective of the study is to compare diagnostic accuracy of perinatal post-mortem magnetic resonance (PMMR) imaging against conventional autopsy, when reported by a single-blinded observer for all organ systems following a period of initial experience. Methods: We compared pre-autopsy PMMR with conventional autopsy for the detection of (1) major pathological abnormalities related to the cause of death and (2) all diagnostic findings in five different body organ systems. PMMR was reported blinded to autopsy findings. Results: In 201 cases, 123/146 (84.2%) of major abnormalities were identified by PMMR. Overall diagnostic accuracy of PMMR was 89.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 84.3, 93.2%] across all cases, with high concordance 91.8% (95% CI: 89.9, 93.4%) across most organ systems. Our study showed higher concordance than single reporter statistics previously reported in neurological [92.2% vs 73.8%; diff 18.4% (95% CI: 11.0, 25.4%) p < 0.01] and thoracic systems [93.7% vs 81.2%; diff 12.5% (95% CI: 6.3, 18.4%) p < 0.01] and slightly better overall [91.8% vs 87.1%; diff 4.7% (95% CI: 2.1, 7.3%) p < 0.01]. Conclusion: The PMMR examinations can be reliably reported by a single radiologist, following a period of experience and training with this specific modality, with high-diagnostic accuracy for all organ systems. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe
Postmortem microfocus computed tomography for early gestation fetuses: a validation study against conventional autopsy
Background: Perinatal autopsy provides useful clinical information in up to 40% of cases. However, there is a substantial unmet clinical need with regards to postmortem investigation of early gestation fetal loss for parents for whom standard autopsy is either not available or not acceptable. Parents dislike the invasive nature of autopsy, but current clinical imaging techniques do not provide high-enough imaging resolution in small fetuses. We hypothesized that microfocus computed tomography, which is a rapid high-resolution imaging technique, could give accurate diagnostic imaging after early gestation fetal loss. Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of microfocus computed tomography for noninvasive human fetal autopsy for early gestation fetuses, with the use of conventional autopsy as the reference standard. Study Design: We compared iodinated whole body microfocus computed tomography in 20 prospectively recruited fetuses (11–21 weeks gestation from 2 centers) with conventional autopsy in a double-blinded manner for a main diagnosis and findings in specific body organs. Fetuses were prepared with 10% formalin/potassium tri-iodide. Images were acquired with a microfocus computed tomography scanner with size-appropriate parameters. Images were evaluated independently by 2 pediatric radiologists, who were blinded to formal perinatal autopsy results, across 40 individual indices to reach consensus. The primary outcome was agreement between microfocus computed tomography and conventional autopsy for overall diagnosis. Results: Postmortem whole body fetal microfocus computed tomography gave noninvasive autopsy in minutes, at a mean resolution of 27μm, with high diagnostic accuracy in fetuses at 14 weeks gestation (agreement, 97.2% and 97.9%, respectively). Within first-trimester fetal loss cases (<14 weeks gestation), microfocus computed tomography analysis yielded significantly fewer nondiagnostic indices than autopsy examination (22/440 vs 48/348, respectively; P<.001). Conclusion: Postmortem whole-body fetal microfocus computed tomography gives noninvasive, detailed anatomic examinations that are achieved in minutes at high resolution. Microfocus computed tomography may be preferable to magnetic resonance imaging in early gestation fetuses and may offer an acceptable method of examination after fetal loss for parents who decline invasive autopsy. This will facilitate autopsy and subsequent discussions between medical professionals who are involved in patient care and counselling for future pregnancies.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe