How Does Frailty Factor Into Mortality Risk Assessment of a Middle-Aged and Geriatric Trauma Population?

Introduction: Frailty in elderly trauma populations has been correlated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged (STTGMA) is a validated mortality risk score that evaluates 4 major physiologic criteria: age, comorbidities, vital signs, and anatomic injuries. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the addition of additional frailty variables to the STTGMA tool would improve risk stratification of a middle-aged and elderly trauma population. Methods: A total of 1486 patients aged 55 years and older who met the American College of Surgeons Tier 1 to 3 criteria and/or who had orthopedic or neurosurgical traumatic consultations in the emergency department between September 2014 and September 2016 were included. The STTGMA ORIGINAL and STTGMA FRAILTY scores were calculated. Additional “frailty variables” included preinjury assistive device use (disability), independent ambulatory status (functional independence), and albumin level (nutrition). The ability of the STTGMA ORIGINAL and the STTGMA FRAILTY models to predict inpatient mortality was compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs). Results: There were 23 high-energy inpatient mortalities (4.7%) and 20 low-energy inpatient mortalities (2.0%). When the STTGMA ORIGINAL model was used, the AUROC in the high-energy and low-energy cohorts was 0.926 and 0.896, respectively. The AUROC for STTGMA FRAILTY for the high-energy and low-energy cohorts was 0.905 and 0.937, respectively. There was no significant difference in predictive capacity for inpatient mortality between STTGMA ORIGINAL and STTGMA FRAILTY for both the high-energy and low-energy cohorts. Conclusion: The original STTGMA tool accounts for important frailty factors including cognition and general health status. These variables combined with other major physiologic variables such as age and anatomic injuries appear to be sufficient to adequately and accurately quantify inpatient mortality risk. The addition of other common frailty factors that account for does not enhance the STTGMA tool’s predictive capabilities

Development of a novel scoring tool to predict the need for early cricothyroidotomy in trauma patients

Background: The lack of a widely-used tool for predicting early cricothyroidotomy in trauma patients prompted us to develop the Cricothyroidotomy After Trauma (CAT) score. We aimed to predict the need for cricothyroidotomy within one hour of trauma patient arrival. Methods: Derivation and validation datasets were obtained from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database. Logistic modeling identified predictors, and weighted averages were used to create the CAT score. The score's performance was assessed using AUROC. Results: Among 1,373,823 derivation patients, <1 % (n = 339) underwent cricothyroidotomy within one hour. The CAT score, comprising nine predictors, achieved an AUROC of 0.88. Severe neck injury and gunshot wound were the strongest predictors. Cricothyroidotomy rates increased from 0.4 % to 9.3 % at scores of 5 and 8, respectively. In the validation set, the CAT tool yielded an AUROC of 0.9. Conclusion: The CAT score is a validated tool for predicting the need for early cricothyroidotomy in trauma patients. Further research is necessary to enhance its utility and assess its value in trauma care

Non-Surgical Management and Analgesia Strategies for Older Adults with Multiple Rib Fractures: a Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Practice Management Guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Chest wall injury in older adults is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Optimal nonsurgical management strategies for these patients have not been fully defined regarding level of care, incentive spirometry, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, and the use of ketamine, epidural and other locoregional approaches to analgesia. METHODS: Relevant questions regarding older patients with significant chest wall injury with patient Population(s), Intervention(s), Comparison(s), and appropriate selected Outcomes (PICO) were chosen. These focused on ICU admission, incentive spirometry, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, and analgesia including ketamine, epidural analgesia, and locoregional nerve blocks. A systematic literature search and review was conducted, and our data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively and the quality of evidence assessed per the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. No funding was utilized. RESULTS: Our literature review (PROSPERO 2020-CRD42020201241,MEDLINE,EMBASE, Cochrane,Web of Science,1/15/2020) resulted in 151 studies. ICU admission was qualitatively not superior for any defined cohort other than by clinical assessment. Poor incentive spirometry performance was associated with prolonged hospital length of stay, pulmonary complications, and unplanned ICU admission. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation was associated with 85% reduction in odds of pneumonia (p \u3c 0.0001) and 81% reduction in odds of mortality (p = 0.03) in suitable patients without risk of airway loss. Ketamine use demonstrated no significant reduction in pain score but a trend toward reduced opioid use. Epidural and other locoregional analgesia techniques did not affect pneumonia, length of mechanical ventilation, hospital length of stay or mortality. CONCLUSION: We do not recommend for or against routine ICU admission. We recommend use of incentive spirometry to inform ICU status and conditionally recommend use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in patients without risk of airway loss. We offer no recommendation for or against ketamine, epidural or other locoregional analgesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Guideline; systematic review/meta-analysis, level IV