26 research outputs found

    Verbal working memory modulates afferent circuits in motor cortex

    Full text link
    Verbal instruction and strategies informed by declarative memory are key to performance and acquisition of skilled actions. We previously demonstrated that anatomically distinct sensory–motor inputs converging on the corticospinal neurons of motor cortex are differentially sensitive to visual attention load. However, how loading of working memory shapes afferent input to motor cortex is unknown. This study used short‐latency afferent inhibition (SAI) to probe the effect of verbal working memory upon anatomically distinct afferent circuits converging on corticospinal neurons in the motor cortex. SAI was elicited by preceding a suprathreshold transcranial magnetic stimulus (TMS) with electrical stimulation of the median nerve at the wrist while participants mentally rehearsed a two‐ or six‐digit numeric memory set. To isolate different afferent intracortical circuits in motor cortex SAI was elicited, using TMS involving posterior–anterior (PA) or anterior–posterior (AP) monophasic current. Both PA and AP SAI were significantly reduced during maintenance of the six‐digit compared to two‐digit memory set. The generalized effect of working memory across anatomically distinct circuits converging upon corticospinal neurons in motor cortex is in contrast to the specific sensitivity of AP SAI to increased attention load. The common response across the PA and AP SAI circuits to increased working memory load may reflect an indiscriminate perisomatic mechanism involved in the voluntary facilitation of desired and/or suppression of unwanted actions during action selection or response conflict.Increasing the set size of digits to be maintained in working memory significantly reduced short‐latency afferent inhibition (SAI) in anatomically distinct circuits recruited by posterior–anterior (PA) and anterior–posterior (AP) transcranial magnetic stimulating (TMS) current. Loading of working memory decreases sensory afferent input across multiple intracortical circuits that converge upon corticospinal neurons in motor cortex.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146615/1/ejn14154.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146615/2/ejn14154_am.pd

    Modulation of sensory processing during simultaneous bimodal stimulation: Effects of sensorimotor integration

    Get PDF
    Illusions such as the McGurk (McGurk and MacDonald, 1976) and ventriloquist (Radeau and Bertelson, 1974) effects or visual capture sensorimotor deficits (Holmes et al., 2004) demonstrate that our perception of and interaction with our environment is shaped by our ability to extract and integrate relevant sensory inputs across multiple modalities. Physiologically extraction occurs through a mechanism that facilitates relevant sensory representations and/or suppresses irrelevant ones within secondary sensory cortices, areas traditionally viewed as “modality-specific” cortex. This mechanism is commonly called “attention”. The purpose of the current thesis is to investigate the influence of motor requirements upon attentional modulation of sensory processing. It was hypothesized that different task demands associated with sensory processing for continuous movement rather than perception would result in earlier loci and/or different mechanisms of attentional modulation. Two studies used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate intermodal influences between a vibrotactile and visuospatial stimulus during a continuous sensorimotor task. These studies revealed that attention to vibrotactile stimulation guiding a continuous movement resulted in decreased activation in primary somatosensory cortex (S1) relative to when the same stimulus was an irrelevant distracter. This was regardless of the spatial or temporal properties of the two modalities. In a third study, somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) demonstrated that somatosensory processing is influenced as early as arrival to S1 from thalamic-cortical projections, however, SEPs did not demonstrate decreased activation during vibrotactile tracking. A fourth study using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) confirmed differential excitability of S1 dependent upon whether the same sensory stimulus was used for perception or to guide a continuous sensorimotor transformation. Finally, a fifth study using behavioral measures demonstrated that the intramodal signal to noise ratio is an important factor in determining intermodal influence. This thesis provides insight into the influence of motor requirements upon sensory processing and demonstrates its importance in understanding how information is extracted from our environment. Understanding this has important implications for the interpretation/development of future work investigating intermodal influences upon sensory-processing

    The effects of verbal and spatial working memory on short- and long-latency sensorimotor circuits in the motor cortex.

    No full text
    Multiple sensorimotor loops converge in the motor cortex to create an adaptable system capable of context-specific sensorimotor control. Afferent inhibition provides a non-invasive tool to investigate the substrates by which procedural and cognitive control processes interact to shape motor corticospinal projections. Varying the transcranial magnetic stimulation properties during afferent inhibition can probe specific sensorimotor circuits that contribute to short- and long-latency periods of inhibition in response to the peripheral stimulation. The current study used short- (SAI) and long-latency (LAI) afferent inhibition to probe the influence of verbal and spatial working memory load on the specific sensorimotor circuits recruited by posterior-anterior (PA) and anterior-posterior (AP) TMS-induced current. Participants completed two sessions where SAI and LAI were assessed during the short-term maintenance of two- or six-item sets of letters (verbal) or stimulus locations (spatial). The only difference between the sessions was the direction of the induced current. PA SAI decreased as the verbal working memory load increased. In contrast, AP SAI was not modulated by verbal working memory load. Visuospatial working memory load did not affect PA or AP SAI. Neither PA LAI nor AP LAI were sensitive to verbal or spatial working memory load. The dissociation of short-latency PA and AP sensorimotor circuits and short- and long-latency PA sensorimotor circuits with increasing verbal working memory load support multiple convergent sensorimotor loops that provide distinct functional information to facilitate context-specific supraspinal control
    corecore