16 research outputs found

    Caffeine Regulates Alternative Splicing in a Subset of Cancer-Associated Genes: a Role for SC35▿

    No full text
    Alternative splicing of pre-mRNA contributes significantly to human proteomic complexity, playing a key role in development, gene expression and, when aberrant, human disease onset. Many of the factors involved in alternative splicing have been identified, but little is known about their regulation. Here we report that caffeine regulates alternative splicing of a subset of cancer-associated genes, including the tumor suppressor KLF6. This regulation is at the level of splice site selection, occurs rapidly and reversibly, and is concentration dependent. We have recapitulated caffeine-induced alternative splicing of KLF6 using a cell-based minigene assay and identified a “caffeine response element” within the KLF6 intronic sequence. Significantly, a chimeric minigene splicing assay demonstrated that this caffeine response element is functional in a heterologous context; similar elements exist within close proximity to caffeine-regulated exons of other genes in the subset. Furthermore, the SR splicing factor, SC35, was shown to be required for induction of the alternatively spliced KLF6 transcript. Importantly, SC35 is markedly induced by caffeine, and overexpression of SC35 is sufficient to mimic the effect of caffeine on KLF6 alternative splicing. Taken together, our data implicate SC35 as a key player in caffeine-mediated splicing regulation. This novel effect of caffeine provides a valuable tool for dissecting the regulation of alternative splicing of a large gene subset and may have implications with respect to splice variants associated with disease states

    Species-Specific Differences in Translational Regulation of Dihydrofolate Reductase

    No full text
    We have observed that rodent cell lines (mouse, hamster) contain approximately 10 times the levels of dihydrofolate reductase as human cell lines, yet the sensitivity to methotrexate (ED50), the folate antagonist that targets this enzyme, is similar. Our previous studies showed that dihydrofolate reductase protein levels increased after methotrexate exposure, and we proposed that this increase was due to the relief of feedback inhibition of translation as a consequence of methotrexate binding to dihydrofolate reductase. In the current report, we show that unlike what was observed in human cells, dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) levels do not increase in hamster cells after methotrexate exposure. We provide evidence to show that although there are differences in the putative mRNA structure between hamster and human mRNA in the dihydrofolate reductase binding region previously identified, “hamsterization” of this region in human dihydrofolate reductase mRNA did not change the level of the enzyme or its induction by methotrexate. Further experiments showed that human dihydrofolate reductase is a promiscuous enzyme and that it is the difference between the hamster and human dihydrofolate reductase protein, rather than the DHFR mRNA, that determines the response to methotrexate exposure. We also present evidence to suggest that the translational up-regulation of dihydrofolate reductase by methotrexate in tumor cells is an adaptive mechanism that decreases sensitivity to this drug
    corecore