3 research outputs found

    Type 1 diabetes incidence in Scotland between 2006 and 2019

    Get PDF
    Funding Information: We acknowledge with gratitude the contributions of people and organisations involved in providing data, setting up, maintaining and overseeing collation of data for people with diabetes in Scotland. The Scottish Diabetes Research Network is supported by National Health Service (NHS) Research Scotland, a partnership involving Scottish NHS Boards and the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government. We are grateful to Professor Paul McKeigue for advice on generation and interpretation of ageā€periodā€cohort models. Publisher Copyright: Ā© 2023 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

    Improving communication and recall of information in paediatric diabetes consultations: a qualitative study of parents' experiences and views

    Get PDF
    Background Parents of non-adolescent children with type 1 diabetes are responsible for most of their childā€™s diabetes management tasks. Consultations are used to provide diabetes education, review clinical progress and promote diabetes management tasks. This study explored parentsā€™ experiences of, and views about, their childā€™s diabetes consultations. The objective was to identify ways in which consultations could be improved to aid communication, understanding and knowledge retention. Methods In-depth interviews with 54 parents of children (aged ā‰¤12 years) with type 1 diabetes. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach. Results Parentsā€™ accounts revealed structural and contextual factors which could hinder effective communication and knowledge acquisition during consultations. Most reported feeling anxious going into consultations and worrying about being reprimanded by health professionals if their childā€™s glycaemic control had not improved. As a consequence, many parents highlighted problems concentrating and assimilating information during consultations. In extreme cases, worries about being reprimanded led parents to omit or fabricate information when discussing their childā€™s treatment or even to their cancelling appointments. Many parents described wanting opportunities to speak to health professionals alone because young children could be distracting and/or they did not want to raise distressing issues in front of their child. Parents described the benefits of receiving clinical advice from health professionals familiar with their family circumstances and disliking attending busy clinics and seeing different health professionals on each occasion. Parents also highlighted the benefits of receiving treatment recommendations in a written form after the consultation. Discussion and conclusions This study has highlighted unrecognised and undocumented aspects of the consultation which may result in parents leaving uncertain about the main issues discussed and with questions unanswered and support needs unaddressed. Structural and contextual changes to consultations are recommended to improve concentration, knowledge acquisition and retention. These include: sending letters/written summaries after consultations highlighting key decisions, providing opportunities for parents to consult health professionals without their child being present, encouraging parents to ask more questions during consultations, having procedures in place to promote continuity of care and providing parents with consistent and non-contradictory advice
    corecore