High expression of HMGA2 independently predicts poor clinical outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), risk stratification based on cytogenetics and mutation profiling is essential but remains insufficient to select the optimal therapy. Accurate biomarkers are needed to improve prognostic assessment. We analyzed RNA sequencing and survival data of 430 AML patients and identified HMGA2 as a novel prognostic marker. We validated a quantitative PCR test to study the association of HMGA2 expression with clinical outcomes in 358 AML samples. In this training cohort, HMGA2 was highly expressed in 22.3% of AML, mostly in patients with intermediate or adverse cytogenetics. High expression levels of HMGA2 (H + ) were associated with a lower frequency of complete remission (58.8% vs 83.4%, P < 0.001), worse 3-year overall survival (OS, 13.2% vs 43.5%, P < 0.001) and relapse-free survival (RFS, 10.8% vs 44.2%, P < 0.001). A positive HMGA2 test also identified a subgroup of patients unresponsive to standard treatments. Multivariable analyses showed that H + was independently associated with significantly worse OS and RFS, including in the intermediate cytogenetic risk category. These associations were confirmed in a validation cohort of 260 patient samples from the UK NCRI AML17 trial. The HMGA2 test could be implemented in clinical trials developing novel therapeutic strategies for high-risk AML

Sorafenib plus intensive chemotherapy in newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD AML:a randomized, placebo-controlled study by the ALLG.

Sorafenib maintenance improves outcome after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) for patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although promising outcomes have been reported for sorafenib plus intensive chemotherapy, randomized data are limited. This placebo-controlled, phase 2 study (ACTRN12611001112954) randomized 102 patients 18-65 years (2:1) to sorafenib vs placebo (days 4-10) combined with intensive induction; idarubicin 12mg/m2 days 1-3 plus cytarabine 1.5g/m2 twice daily on days 1,3,5,7 (18-55 years) or 100mg/m2 days 1-7 (56-65 years), consolidation therapy, followed by maintenance treatment for 12 months (post-HCT excluded) in newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD AML. Four patients were excluded from modified intention-to-treat final analysis (3 not dosed and 1 later found to be FLT3-ITD negative). Rates of complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CR/CRi) were high in both arms (sorafenib 78%/9%, placebo 70%/24%). With 49.1 months median follow-up, the primary endpoint of event-free survival (EFS) was not improved by sorafenib (2-year EFS 47.9% vs 45.4%)(hazard ratio [HR] 0.87;95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-1.51, p=0.61). Two-year overall survival (OS) was 67% in the sorafenib arm and 58% in the placebo arm (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.42-1.39). For patients transplanted in first remission, 2-year OS was 84% and 67% in the sorafenib and placebo arms, respectively (HR 0.45;95% CI 0.18-1.12, p=0.08). In exploratory analyses, FLT3-ITD measurable residual disease negative status (<0.001%) post-induction was associated with improved 2-year OS (83% vs 60%) (HR 0.4;95% CI 0.17-0.93, p=0.028). In conclusion, routine use of pre-transplant sorafenib plus chemotherapy in unselected patients with FLT3-ITD AML is not supported by this study

Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): And randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study

Background: Bortezomib with dexamethasone is a standard treatment option for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Carfilzomib with dexamethasone has shown promising activity in patients in this disease setting. The aim of this study was to compare the combination of carfilzomib and dexamethasone with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Methods: In this randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study, patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had one to three previous treatments were randomly assigned (1:1) using a blocked randomisation scheme (block size of four) to receive carfilzomib with dexamethasone (carfilzomib group) or bortezomib with dexamethasone (bortezomib group). Randomisation was stratified by previous proteasome inhibitor therapy, previous lines of treatment, International Staging System stage, and planned route of bortezomib administration if randomly assigned to bortezomib with dexamethasone. Patients received treatment until progression with carfilzomib (20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1; 56 mg/m2 thereafter; 30 min intravenous infusion) and dexamethasone (20 mg oral or intravenous infusion) or bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2; intravenous bolus or subcutaneous injection) and dexamethasone (20 mg oral or intravenous infusion). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. All participants who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analyses. The study is ongoing but not enrolling participants; results for the interim analysis of the primary endpoint are presented. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01568866. Findings: Between June 20, 2012, and June 30, 2014, 929 patients were randomly assigned (464 to the carfilzomib group; 465 to the bortezomib group). Median follow-up was 11·9 months (IQR 9·3-16·1) in the carfilzomib group and 11·1 months (8·2-14·3) in the bortezomib group. Median progression-free survival was 18·7 months (95% CI 15·6-not estimable) in the carfilzomib group versus 9·4 months (8·4-10·4) in the bortezomib group at a preplanned interim analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0·53 [95% CI 0·44-0·65]; p<0·0001). On-study death due to adverse events occurred in 18 (4%) of 464 patients in the carfilzomib group and in 16 (3%) of 465 patients in the bortezomib group. Serious adverse events were reported in 224 (48%) of 463 patients in the carfilzomib group and in 162 (36%) of 456 patients in the bortezomib group. The most frequent grade 3 or higher adverse events were anaemia (67 [14%] of 463 patients in the carfilzomib group vs 45 [10%] of 456 patients in the bortezomib group), hypertension (41 [9%] vs 12 [3%]), thrombocytopenia (39 [8%] vs 43 [9%]), and pneumonia (32 [7%] vs 36 [8%]). Interpretation: For patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, carfilzomib with dexamethasone could be considered in cases in which bortezomib with dexamethasone is a potential treatment option. Funding: Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., an Amgen subsidiary

Pretransplant helper T-lymphocyte determination in bone marrow donors: acute graft-versus-host disease prediction and relation with long-term survival

Helper T-lymphocyte precursor (HTLp) frequency from 19 allogeneic bone marrow donors was tested to detect weak antigenic differences with the recipient, and then compared to the outcome. HTLp frequency was estimated in limiting dilution cultures, and HLA-DR and CD 80 expression by stimulating cells was measured by flow cytometry. 12/19 patients experienced acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) grade II–IV. A good correlation was found between high pretransplant HTLp frequency and grade II–IV aGVHD (median: 1/55848 PBMNC for II–IV GVHD versus 1/ 184346 for 0–I GVHD; P¼0·008). Sensitivity was 82%, specificity 63%, negative predictive value 71% and positive predictive value 75%. Long-term survivors also had a lower HTLp median frequency (1/143354) when compared with patients who died as a result of the transplant procedure (1/22100, P < 0·001). No correlation was found between HTLp frequency and HLA-DR or CD80 expression by patient’s cells. We conclude that HTLp frequency estimation can predict, although poorly, acute GVHD risk and long-term survival

The role of stem cell mobilization regimen on lymphocyte collection yield in patients with multiple myeloma

Background The lymphocyte dose (LY-DO) infused during an autograft influences absolute lymphocyte (ALC) recovery and survival following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Factors influencing lymphocyte yield (LY-C) during leukapheresis have been poorly studied. Methods Factors that could influence survival, LY-C and CD34+ cell yield were analyzed in 122 MM patients. Three mobilization regimens were used, granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone (n=13), cyclophosphamide 1-2 g/m2 plus G-CSF (LD-CY, n=62) and cyclophosphamide 3-4 g/m2 and G-CSF (ID-CY, n=47). Results Using multivariate analysis, age, LY-C, ALC on day 30 (ALC-30) and International Staging System stage significantly influenced overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) following ASCT. PFS (56 versus 29 months, P=0.05) and OS (72 versus 49 months; P=0.07) were longer in the LY-C≥0.12109/kg group than the LY-C<0.12109/kg group. LY-C also influenced ALC on day 15 (ALC-15). Mobilization regimen, lymphocytes on the day of leukapheresis, prior radiotherapy and number of leukaphereses significantly influenced LY-C. Significantly higher LY-C was obtained with G-CSF alone compared with the LD-CY and ID-CY groups. CD34+ count on the day of leukapheresis, prior chemotherapy with prednisone, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and BCNU or melphalan, and stem cell mobilization regimen significantly influenced CD34+ cell yield. Discussion LY-C influenced ALC-15 and survival following ASCT. Factors that influenced CD34+ cell yield and LY-C during leukapheresis were different. Mobilization should be tailored to maximize the LY-C and CD34+ cell yield.D.K. Hiwase, S. Hiwase, M. Bailey, G. Bollard and A.P. Schware